-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults
RW. Bohannon, M. Steffl, SS. Glenney, M. Green, L. Cashwell, K. Prajerova, J. Bunn,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NV16-29182A
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
- MeSH
- břišní svaly fyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fyzioterapie (techniky) normy MeSH
- index tělesné hmotnosti MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pronační poloha fyziologie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stárnutí fyziologie MeSH
- svalová síla fyziologie MeSH
- svalová únava fyziologie MeSH
- tělesné váhy a míry MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The prone bridge maneuver, or plank, has been viewed as a potential alternative to curl-ups for assessing trunk muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to assess prone bridge test performance, validity, and reliability among younger and older adults. METHOD: Sixty younger (20-35 years old) and 60 older (60-79 years old) participants completed this study. Groups were evenly divided by sex. Participants completed surveys regarding physical activity and abdominal exercise participation. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured. On two occasions, 5-9 days apart, participants held a prone bridge until volitional exhaustion or until repeated technique failure. Validity was examined using data from the first session: convergent validity by calculating correlations between survey responses, anthropometrics, and prone bridge time, known groups validity by using an ANOVA comparing bridge times of younger and older adults and of men and women. Test-retest reliability was examined by using a paired t-test to compare prone bridge times for Session1 and Session 2. Furthermore, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to characterize relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) was used to describe absolute reliability. RESULTS: The mean prone bridge time was 145.3 ± 71.5 s, and was positively correlated with physical activity participation (p ≤ 0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI and waist circumference (p ≤ 0.003). Younger participants had significantly longer plank times than older participants (p = 0.003). The ICC between testing sessions was 0.915. CONCLUSION: The prone bridge test is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating abdominal performance in both younger and older adults.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012627
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221012150126.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.07.005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29861239
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bohannon, Richard W $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
- 245 14
- $a The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults / $c RW. Bohannon, M. Steffl, SS. Glenney, M. Green, L. Cashwell, K. Prajerova, J. Bunn,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: The prone bridge maneuver, or plank, has been viewed as a potential alternative to curl-ups for assessing trunk muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to assess prone bridge test performance, validity, and reliability among younger and older adults. METHOD: Sixty younger (20-35 years old) and 60 older (60-79 years old) participants completed this study. Groups were evenly divided by sex. Participants completed surveys regarding physical activity and abdominal exercise participation. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured. On two occasions, 5-9 days apart, participants held a prone bridge until volitional exhaustion or until repeated technique failure. Validity was examined using data from the first session: convergent validity by calculating correlations between survey responses, anthropometrics, and prone bridge time, known groups validity by using an ANOVA comparing bridge times of younger and older adults and of men and women. Test-retest reliability was examined by using a paired t-test to compare prone bridge times for Session1 and Session 2. Furthermore, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to characterize relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) was used to describe absolute reliability. RESULTS: The mean prone bridge time was 145.3 ± 71.5 s, and was positively correlated with physical activity participation (p ≤ 0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI and waist circumference (p ≤ 0.003). Younger participants had significantly longer plank times than older participants (p = 0.003). The ICC between testing sessions was 0.915. CONCLUSION: The prone bridge test is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating abdominal performance in both younger and older adults.
- 650 _2
- $a břišní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D000009
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a stárnutí $x fyziologie $7 D000375
- 650 _2
- $a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
- 650 _2
- $a tělesné váhy a míry $7 D001837
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a svalová únava $x fyziologie $7 D018763
- 650 _2
- $a svalová síla $x fyziologie $7 D053580
- 650 _2
- $a fyzioterapie (techniky) $x normy $7 D026741
- 650 _2
- $a pronační poloha $x fyziologie $7 D016684
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Steffl, Michal $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Glenney, Susan S $u Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, School of Agriculture and Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Green, Michelle $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Cashwell, Leah $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Prajerová, Květa, $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. $d 1956- $7 xx0276930
- 700 1_
- $a Bunn, Jennifer $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA. Electronic address: bunnj@campbell.edu.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166920 $t Journal of bodywork and movement therapies $x 1532-9283 $g Roč. 22, č. 2 (2018), s. 385-389
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29861239 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221012150121 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391937 $s 1050932
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 22 $c 2 $d 385-389 $e 20170725 $i 1532-9283 $m Journal of bodywork and movement therapies $n J Bodyw Mov Ther $x MED00166920
- GRA __
- $a NV16-29182A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405