• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults

RW. Bohannon, M. Steffl, SS. Glenney, M. Green, L. Cashwell, K. Prajerova, J. Bunn,

. 2018 ; 22 (2) : 385-389. [pub] 20170725

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012627

Grantová podpora
NV16-29182A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

INTRODUCTION: The prone bridge maneuver, or plank, has been viewed as a potential alternative to curl-ups for assessing trunk muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to assess prone bridge test performance, validity, and reliability among younger and older adults. METHOD: Sixty younger (20-35 years old) and 60 older (60-79 years old) participants completed this study. Groups were evenly divided by sex. Participants completed surveys regarding physical activity and abdominal exercise participation. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured. On two occasions, 5-9 days apart, participants held a prone bridge until volitional exhaustion or until repeated technique failure. Validity was examined using data from the first session: convergent validity by calculating correlations between survey responses, anthropometrics, and prone bridge time, known groups validity by using an ANOVA comparing bridge times of younger and older adults and of men and women. Test-retest reliability was examined by using a paired t-test to compare prone bridge times for Session1 and Session 2. Furthermore, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to characterize relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) was used to describe absolute reliability. RESULTS: The mean prone bridge time was 145.3 ± 71.5 s, and was positively correlated with physical activity participation (p ≤ 0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI and waist circumference (p ≤ 0.003). Younger participants had significantly longer plank times than older participants (p = 0.003). The ICC between testing sessions was 0.915. CONCLUSION: The prone bridge test is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating abdominal performance in both younger and older adults.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012627
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221012150126.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.07.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29861239
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Bohannon, Richard W $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
245    14
$a The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults / $c RW. Bohannon, M. Steffl, SS. Glenney, M. Green, L. Cashwell, K. Prajerova, J. Bunn,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The prone bridge maneuver, or plank, has been viewed as a potential alternative to curl-ups for assessing trunk muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to assess prone bridge test performance, validity, and reliability among younger and older adults. METHOD: Sixty younger (20-35 years old) and 60 older (60-79 years old) participants completed this study. Groups were evenly divided by sex. Participants completed surveys regarding physical activity and abdominal exercise participation. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured. On two occasions, 5-9 days apart, participants held a prone bridge until volitional exhaustion or until repeated technique failure. Validity was examined using data from the first session: convergent validity by calculating correlations between survey responses, anthropometrics, and prone bridge time, known groups validity by using an ANOVA comparing bridge times of younger and older adults and of men and women. Test-retest reliability was examined by using a paired t-test to compare prone bridge times for Session1 and Session 2. Furthermore, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to characterize relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) was used to describe absolute reliability. RESULTS: The mean prone bridge time was 145.3 ± 71.5 s, and was positively correlated with physical activity participation (p ≤ 0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI and waist circumference (p ≤ 0.003). Younger participants had significantly longer plank times than older participants (p = 0.003). The ICC between testing sessions was 0.915. CONCLUSION: The prone bridge test is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating abdominal performance in both younger and older adults.
650    _2
$a břišní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D000009
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a stárnutí $x fyziologie $7 D000375
650    _2
$a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
650    _2
$a tělesné váhy a míry $7 D001837
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a svalová únava $x fyziologie $7 D018763
650    _2
$a svalová síla $x fyziologie $7 D053580
650    _2
$a fyzioterapie (techniky) $x normy $7 D026741
650    _2
$a pronační poloha $x fyziologie $7 D016684
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Steffl, Michal $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Glenney, Susan S $u Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, School of Agriculture and Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
700    1_
$a Green, Michelle $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
700    1_
$a Cashwell, Leah $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
700    1_
$a Prajerová, Květa, $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. $d 1956- $7 xx0276930
700    1_
$a Bunn, Jennifer $u Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA. Electronic address: bunnj@campbell.edu.
773    0_
$w MED00166920 $t Journal of bodywork and movement therapies $x 1532-9283 $g Roč. 22, č. 2 (2018), s. 385-389
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29861239 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221012150121 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391937 $s 1050932
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 22 $c 2 $d 385-389 $e 20170725 $i 1532-9283 $m Journal of bodywork and movement therapies $n J Bodyw Mov Ther $x MED00166920
GRA    __
$a NV16-29182A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...