• Something wrong with this record ?

Detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in wild small mammals and sensitivity of PCR and cultivation

HL. Kučerová, A. Žákovská, J. Marková, E. Bártová,

. 2019 ; 230 (-) : 241-243. [pub] 20190204

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to B. burgdorferi s.l. in wild small mammals in the Czech Republic and compare sensitivity of PCR and cultivaton. Wild small mammals (n = 691) were trapped in years 2010-2014 in three localities of the Czech Republic. Heart rinses (n = 340) and sera (n = 351) were examined by modified indirect ELISA. Seventy animals were randomly selected for comparison of results of cultivation and PCR. Mean annual antiborelian positivity was 12% with statistical difference (p < 0.05) between Bank Vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and other six animal species, while there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between rodentia and insectivora, gender and localities. The cultivation revealed one positive sample (1.4%), negative in both PCR and ELISA. Method PCR revealed seven positive samples (10%); two of them were simultaneously dubious in ELISA. Eleven animals, negative in cultivation and PCR, had antibodies in ELISA. Method of PCR compared to cultivation seems to be more sensitive for detection of Borrelia.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027759
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190816122232.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.02.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30827395
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kučerová, Hana Lya $u Department of Comparative Animal Physiology and General Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in wild small mammals and sensitivity of PCR and cultivation / $c HL. Kučerová, A. Žákovská, J. Marková, E. Bártová,
520    9_
$a The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to B. burgdorferi s.l. in wild small mammals in the Czech Republic and compare sensitivity of PCR and cultivaton. Wild small mammals (n = 691) were trapped in years 2010-2014 in three localities of the Czech Republic. Heart rinses (n = 340) and sera (n = 351) were examined by modified indirect ELISA. Seventy animals were randomly selected for comparison of results of cultivation and PCR. Mean annual antiborelian positivity was 12% with statistical difference (p < 0.05) between Bank Vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and other six animal species, while there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between rodentia and insectivora, gender and localities. The cultivation revealed one positive sample (1.4%), negative in both PCR and ELISA. Method PCR revealed seven positive samples (10%); two of them were simultaneously dubious in ELISA. Eleven animals, negative in cultivation and PCR, had antibodies in ELISA. Method of PCR compared to cultivation seems to be more sensitive for detection of Borrelia.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a divoká zvířata $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D000835
650    _2
$a protilátky bakteriální $x krev $7 D000907
650    _2
$a Arvicolinae $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D003411
650    _2
$a Borrelia burgdorferi $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $x imunologie $7 D025065
650    _2
$a ELISA $7 D004797
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin G $x krev $7 D007074
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin M $x krev $7 D007075
650    _2
$a lymeská nemoc $x epidemiologie $x imunologie $x veterinární $7 D008193
650    _2
$a savci $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D008322
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
650    _2
$a hlodavci $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D012377
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a séroepidemiologické studie $7 D016036
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Žákovská, Alena $u Department of Comparative Animal Physiology and General Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Marková, Jiřina $u Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého tř. 1946/1, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bártová, Eva $u Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého tř. 1946/1, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: bartovae@vfu.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00005709 $t Veterinary microbiology $x 1873-2542 $g Roč. 230, č. - (2019), s. 241-243
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30827395 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190816122501 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1432908 $s 1066219
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 230 $c - $d 241-243 $e 20190204 $i 1873-2542 $m Veterinary microbiology $n Vet Microbiol $x MED00005709
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...