Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial

T. Vetrovsky, J. Cupka, M. Dudek, B. Kuthanova, K. Vetrovska, V. Capek, V. Bunc,

. 2018 ; 18 (1) : 635. [pub] 20180516

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028426

Grantová podpora
Progres Q41 Univerzita Karlova v Praze - International

BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a fundamental role in combatting the current epidemic of physical inactivity, and pedometer-based walking interventions are able to increase physical activity levels of their patients. Supplementing these interventions with email counseling driven by feedback from the pedometer has the potential to further improve their effectiveness but it has to be yet confirmed in clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of our pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of future trials designed to assess the additional benefit of email counseling added to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting. METHODS: Physically inactive patients were opportunistically recruited from four general practices and randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with or without email counseling. To explore the feasibility of future trials, we assessed the speed and efficiency of recruitment, adherence to wearing the pedometer, and engagement with email counseling. To evaluate the potential efficacy, daily step-count was the primary outcome and blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, and body mass were the secondary outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of structured interviews with the participating general practitioners. RESULTS: The opportunistic recruitment has been shown to be feasible and acceptable, but relatively slow and inefficient; moreover, general practitioners selectively recruited overweight and obese patients. Patients manifested high adherence, wearing the pedometer on 83% (± 20) of days. All patients from the counseling group actively participated in email communication and responded to 46% (± 22) of the emails they received. Both groups significantly increased their daily step-count (pedometer-plus-email, + 2119, p = 0.002; pedometer-alone, + 1336, p = 0.03), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.18). When analyzing both groups combined, there was a significant decrease in body mass (- 0.68 kg, p = 0.04), waist circumference (- 1.73 cm, p = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure (- 3.48 mmHg, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that adding email counseling to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting is feasible and might have the potential to increase the efficacy of such an intervention in increasing physical activity levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03135561 , date: April 26, 2017).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028426
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240321102555.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12889-018-5520-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29769107
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic. tomas.vetrovsky@gmail.com.
245    12
$a A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial / $c T. Vetrovsky, J. Cupka, M. Dudek, B. Kuthanova, K. Vetrovska, V. Capek, V. Bunc,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a fundamental role in combatting the current epidemic of physical inactivity, and pedometer-based walking interventions are able to increase physical activity levels of their patients. Supplementing these interventions with email counseling driven by feedback from the pedometer has the potential to further improve their effectiveness but it has to be yet confirmed in clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of our pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of future trials designed to assess the additional benefit of email counseling added to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting. METHODS: Physically inactive patients were opportunistically recruited from four general practices and randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with or without email counseling. To explore the feasibility of future trials, we assessed the speed and efficiency of recruitment, adherence to wearing the pedometer, and engagement with email counseling. To evaluate the potential efficacy, daily step-count was the primary outcome and blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, and body mass were the secondary outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of structured interviews with the participating general practitioners. RESULTS: The opportunistic recruitment has been shown to be feasible and acceptable, but relatively slow and inefficient; moreover, general practitioners selectively recruited overweight and obese patients. Patients manifested high adherence, wearing the pedometer on 83% (± 20) of days. All patients from the counseling group actively participated in email communication and responded to 46% (± 22) of the emails they received. Both groups significantly increased their daily step-count (pedometer-plus-email, + 2119, p = 0.002; pedometer-alone, + 1336, p = 0.03), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.18). When analyzing both groups combined, there was a significant decrease in body mass (- 0.68 kg, p = 0.04), waist circumference (- 1.73 cm, p = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure (- 3.48 mmHg, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that adding email counseling to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting is feasible and might have the potential to increase the efficacy of such an intervention in increasing physical activity levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03135561 , date: April 26, 2017).
650    _2
$a aktigrafie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D056044
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a poradenství $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003376
650    _2
$a elektronická pošta $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D034742
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a praktické lékařství $7 D058006
650    _2
$a podpora zdraví $x metody $7 D006293
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a hodnocení programu $7 D015397
650    _2
$a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Cupka, Jozef $u Mediciman s.r.o, Maxovska 1019/6, 155 00, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dudek, Martin $u Laureus s.r.o, Palackeho 541, 252 29, Dobrichovice, Czech Republic. $7 xx0315273
700    1_
$a Kuthanova, Blanka $u Praktici Praha 6, s.r.o, Vitezne namesti 817/9, 160 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vetrovska, Klaudia $u Humilitas s.r.o, Na Veselou 698/2, 266 01, Beroun, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Capek, Vaclav $u Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bunc, Vaclav $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00008205 $t BMC public health $x 1471-2458 $g Roč. 18, č. 1 (2018), s. 635
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29769107 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240321102548 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433575 $s 1066886
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 18 $c 1 $d 635 $e 20180516 $i 1471-2458 $m BMC public health $n BMC Public Health $x MED00008205
GRA    __
$a Progres Q41 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...