-
Something wrong with this record ?
A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial
T. Vetrovsky, J. Cupka, M. Dudek, B. Kuthanova, K. Vetrovska, V. Capek, V. Bunc,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
Grant support
Progres Q41
Univerzita Karlova v Praze - International
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
Europe PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Actigraphy instrumentation MeSH
- Walking physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electronic Mail statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Program Evaluation MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Health Promotion methods MeSH
- Counseling statistics & numerical data MeSH
- General Practice * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a fundamental role in combatting the current epidemic of physical inactivity, and pedometer-based walking interventions are able to increase physical activity levels of their patients. Supplementing these interventions with email counseling driven by feedback from the pedometer has the potential to further improve their effectiveness but it has to be yet confirmed in clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of our pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of future trials designed to assess the additional benefit of email counseling added to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting. METHODS: Physically inactive patients were opportunistically recruited from four general practices and randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with or without email counseling. To explore the feasibility of future trials, we assessed the speed and efficiency of recruitment, adherence to wearing the pedometer, and engagement with email counseling. To evaluate the potential efficacy, daily step-count was the primary outcome and blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, and body mass were the secondary outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of structured interviews with the participating general practitioners. RESULTS: The opportunistic recruitment has been shown to be feasible and acceptable, but relatively slow and inefficient; moreover, general practitioners selectively recruited overweight and obese patients. Patients manifested high adherence, wearing the pedometer on 83% (± 20) of days. All patients from the counseling group actively participated in email communication and responded to 46% (± 22) of the emails they received. Both groups significantly increased their daily step-count (pedometer-plus-email, + 2119, p = 0.002; pedometer-alone, + 1336, p = 0.03), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.18). When analyzing both groups combined, there was a significant decrease in body mass (- 0.68 kg, p = 0.04), waist circumference (- 1.73 cm, p = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure (- 3.48 mmHg, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that adding email counseling to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting is feasible and might have the potential to increase the efficacy of such an intervention in increasing physical activity levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03135561 , date: April 26, 2017).
2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 5 Uvalu 84 150 06 Prague 5 Czech Republic
Humilitas s r o Na Veselou 698 2 266 01 Beroun Czech Republic
Laureus s r o Palackeho 541 252 29 Dobrichovice Czech Republic
Mediciman s r o Maxovska 1019 6 155 00 Prague 5 Czech Republic
Praktici Praha 6 s r o Vitezne namesti 817 9 160 00 Prague 6 Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028426
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240321102555.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12889-018-5520-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29769107
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic. tomas.vetrovsky@gmail.com.
- 245 12
- $a A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial / $c T. Vetrovsky, J. Cupka, M. Dudek, B. Kuthanova, K. Vetrovska, V. Capek, V. Bunc,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a fundamental role in combatting the current epidemic of physical inactivity, and pedometer-based walking interventions are able to increase physical activity levels of their patients. Supplementing these interventions with email counseling driven by feedback from the pedometer has the potential to further improve their effectiveness but it has to be yet confirmed in clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of our pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of future trials designed to assess the additional benefit of email counseling added to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting. METHODS: Physically inactive patients were opportunistically recruited from four general practices and randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with or without email counseling. To explore the feasibility of future trials, we assessed the speed and efficiency of recruitment, adherence to wearing the pedometer, and engagement with email counseling. To evaluate the potential efficacy, daily step-count was the primary outcome and blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, and body mass were the secondary outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of structured interviews with the participating general practitioners. RESULTS: The opportunistic recruitment has been shown to be feasible and acceptable, but relatively slow and inefficient; moreover, general practitioners selectively recruited overweight and obese patients. Patients manifested high adherence, wearing the pedometer on 83% (± 20) of days. All patients from the counseling group actively participated in email communication and responded to 46% (± 22) of the emails they received. Both groups significantly increased their daily step-count (pedometer-plus-email, + 2119, p = 0.002; pedometer-alone, + 1336, p = 0.03), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.18). When analyzing both groups combined, there was a significant decrease in body mass (- 0.68 kg, p = 0.04), waist circumference (- 1.73 cm, p = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure (- 3.48 mmHg, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that adding email counseling to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting is feasible and might have the potential to increase the efficacy of such an intervention in increasing physical activity levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03135561 , date: April 26, 2017).
- 650 _2
- $a aktigrafie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D056044
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a poradenství $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003376
- 650 _2
- $a elektronická pošta $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D034742
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a praktické lékařství $7 D058006
- 650 _2
- $a podpora zdraví $x metody $7 D006293
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení programu $7 D015397
- 650 _2
- $a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Cupka, Jozef $u Mediciman s.r.o, Maxovska 1019/6, 155 00, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dudek, Martin $u Laureus s.r.o, Palackeho 541, 252 29, Dobrichovice, Czech Republic. $7 xx0315273
- 700 1_
- $a Kuthanova, Blanka $u Praktici Praha 6, s.r.o, Vitezne namesti 817/9, 160 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vetrovska, Klaudia $u Humilitas s.r.o, Na Veselou 698/2, 266 01, Beroun, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Capek, Vaclav $u Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bunc, Vaclav $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008205 $t BMC public health $x 1471-2458 $g Roč. 18, č. 1 (2018), s. 635
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29769107 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240321102548 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433575 $s 1066886
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 18 $c 1 $d 635 $e 20180516 $i 1471-2458 $m BMC public health $n BMC Public Health $x MED00008205
- GRA __
- $a Progres Q41 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze $2 International
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813