• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges

M. Widschwendter, A. Jones, I. Evans, D. Reisel, J. Dillner, K. Sundström, EW. Steyerberg, Y. Vergouwe, O. Wegwarth, FG. Rebitschek, U. Siebert, G. Sroczynski, ID. de Beaufort, I. Bolt, D. Cibula, M. Zikan, L. Bjørge, N. Colombo, N. Harbeck, F....

. 2018 ; 15 (5) : 292-309. [pub] 20180227

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028544

The incidence of cancer is continuing to rise and risk-tailored early diagnostic and/or primary prevention strategies are urgently required. The ideal risk-predictive test should: integrate the effects of both genetic and nongenetic factors and aim to capture these effects using an approach that is both biologically stable and technically reproducible; derive a score from easily accessible biological samples that acts as a surrogate for the organ in question; and enable the effectiveness of risk-reducing measures to be monitored. Substantial evidence has accumulated suggesting that the epigenome and, in particular, DNA methylation-based tests meet all of these requirements. However, the development and implementation of DNA methylation-based risk-prediction tests poses considerable challenges. In particular, the cell type specificity of DNA methylation and the extensive cellular heterogeneity of the easily accessible surrogate cells that might contain information relevant to less accessible tissues necessitates the use of novel methods in order to account for these confounding issues. Furthermore, the engagement of the scientific community with health-care professionals, policymakers and the public is required in order to identify and address the organizational, ethical, legal, social and economic challenges associated with the routine use of epigenetic testing.

Breast Center Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics University of Munich Munich Germany

Center for Medical Decision Sciences Department of Public Health Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands

Center for Medical Decision Sciences Department of Public Health Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands Department of Biomedical Data Sciences LUMC Leiden Netherlands

Centre of Genomics and Policy McGill University Montreal Canada

Department of Applied Health Research Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare University College London UK

Department of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden Karolinska University Laboratory Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Netherlands

Department of Non communicable Disease Epidemiology London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1st Medical Faculty of the Charles University and General Faculty Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Haukeland University Hospital and Centre for Cancer Biomarkers Department of Clinical Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Department of Women's Cancer Institute for Women's Health University College London London UK

European Institute of Oncology and University Milan Bicocca Milan Italy

Institute of Public Health Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment Department of Public Health Health Services Research and HTA UMIT University for Health Sciences Medical Informatics and Technology Hall in Tirol Austria

Institute of Public Health Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment Department of Public Health Health Services Research and HTA UMIT University for Health Sciences Medical Informatics and Technology Hall in Tirol Austria Harvard T C Chan School of Public Health Center for Health Decision Science Department of Health Policy and Management Boston MA USA Oncotyrol Center for Personalized Medicine Innsbruck Austria

Max Planck Institute for Human Development Harding Center for Risk Literacy Berlin Germany

Max Planck Institute for Human Development Harding Center for Risk Literacy Berlin Germany Max Planck Institute for Human Development Center for Adaptive Rationality Berlin Germany

Public Population Project in Genomics and Society McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre Montreal Canada

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028544
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190823112326.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.30 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29485132
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Widschwendter, Martin $u Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
245    10
$a Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges / $c M. Widschwendter, A. Jones, I. Evans, D. Reisel, J. Dillner, K. Sundström, EW. Steyerberg, Y. Vergouwe, O. Wegwarth, FG. Rebitschek, U. Siebert, G. Sroczynski, ID. de Beaufort, I. Bolt, D. Cibula, M. Zikan, L. Bjørge, N. Colombo, N. Harbeck, F. Dudbridge, AM. Tasse, BM. Knoppers, Y. Joly, AE. Teschendorff, N. Pashayan, FORECEE (4C) Consortium,
520    9_
$a The incidence of cancer is continuing to rise and risk-tailored early diagnostic and/or primary prevention strategies are urgently required. The ideal risk-predictive test should: integrate the effects of both genetic and nongenetic factors and aim to capture these effects using an approach that is both biologically stable and technically reproducible; derive a score from easily accessible biological samples that acts as a surrogate for the organ in question; and enable the effectiveness of risk-reducing measures to be monitored. Substantial evidence has accumulated suggesting that the epigenome and, in particular, DNA methylation-based tests meet all of these requirements. However, the development and implementation of DNA methylation-based risk-prediction tests poses considerable challenges. In particular, the cell type specificity of DNA methylation and the extensive cellular heterogeneity of the easily accessible surrogate cells that might contain information relevant to less accessible tissues necessitates the use of novel methods in order to account for these confounding issues. Furthermore, the engagement of the scientific community with health-care professionals, policymakers and the public is required in order to identify and address the organizational, ethical, legal, social and economic challenges associated with the routine use of epigenetic testing.
650    _2
$a metylace DNA $x genetika $7 D019175
650    _2
$a epigenomika $x trendy $7 D057890
650    _2
$a genom lidský $x genetika $7 D015894
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nádory $x epidemiologie $x genetika $7 D009369
650    12
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Jones, Allison $u Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Evans, Iona $u Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Reisel, Daniel $u Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Dillner, Joakim $u Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Sundström, Karin $u Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Steyerberg, Ewout W $u Center for Medical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Vergouwe, Yvonne $u Center for Medical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Wegwarth, Odette $u Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rebitschek, Felix G $u Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Siebert, Uwe $u Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research, and HTA, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria. Harvard T. C. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston, MA, USA. Oncotyrol: Center for Personalized Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Sroczynski, Gaby $u Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research, and HTA, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
700    1_
$a de Beaufort, Inez D $u Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Bolt, Ineke $u Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Medical Faculty of the Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zikan, Michal $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Medical Faculty of the Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bjørge, Line $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, and Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Colombo, Nicoletta $u European Institute of Oncology and University Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Harbeck, Nadia $u Breast Center, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Dudbridge, Frank $u Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
700    1_
$a Tasse, Anne-Marie $u Public Population Project in Genomics and Society, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Canada.
700    1_
$a Knoppers, Bartha M $u Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
700    1_
$a Joly, Yann $u Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
700    1_
$a Teschendorff, Andrew E $u Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Pashayan, Nora $u Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, UK.
710    2_
$a FORECEE (4C) Consortium
773    0_
$w MED00163571 $t Nature reviews. Clinical oncology $x 1759-4782 $g Roč. 15, č. 5 (2018), s. 292-309
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29485132 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190823112540 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433693 $s 1067004
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 15 $c 5 $d 292-309 $e 20180227 $i 1759-4782 $m Nature reviews. Clinical oncology $n Nat. rev., Clin. oncol. $x MED00163571
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...