• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Clinical value of different QRS-T angle expressions

K. Hnatkova, J. Seegers, P. Barthel, T. Novotny, P. Smetana, M. Zabel, G. Schmidt, M. Malik,

. 2018 ; 20 (8) : 1352-1361. [pub] 20180801

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028727

Aims: Increased spatial angle between QRS complex and T wave loop orientations has repeatedly been shown to predict cardiac risk. However, there is no consensus on the methods for the calculation of the angle. This study compared the reproducibility and predictive power of three most common ways of QRS-T angle assessment. Methods and results: Electrocardiograms of 352 healthy subjects, 941 survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI), and 605 patients recorded prior to the implantation of automatic defibrillator [implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)] were used to obtain QRS-T angle measurements by the maximum R to T (MRT), area R to T (ART), and total cosine R to T (TCRT) methods. The results were compared in terms of physiologic reproducibility and power to predict mortality in the cardiac patients during 5-year follow-up. Maximum R to T results were significantly less reproducible compared to the other two methods. Among both survivors of acute MI and ICD recipients, TCRT method was statistically significantly more powerful in predicting mortality during follow-up. Among the acute MI survivors, increased spatial QRS-T angle (TCRT assessment) was particularly powerful in predicting sudden cardiac death with the area under the receiver operator characteristic of 78% (90% confidence interval 63-90%). Among the ICD recipients, TCRT also predicted mortality significantly among patients with prolonged QRS complex duration when the spatial orientation of the QRS complex is poorly defined. Conclusion: The TCRT method for the assessment of spatial QRS-T angle appears to offer important advantages in comparison to other methods of measurement. This approach should be included in future clinical studies of the QRS-T angle. The TCRT method might also be a reasonable candidate for the standardization of the QRS-T angle assessment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028727
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190815105322.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/europace/eux246 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29016907
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hnatkova, Katerina $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Dovehouse Street, London, UK.
245    10
$a Clinical value of different QRS-T angle expressions / $c K. Hnatkova, J. Seegers, P. Barthel, T. Novotny, P. Smetana, M. Zabel, G. Schmidt, M. Malik,
520    9_
$a Aims: Increased spatial angle between QRS complex and T wave loop orientations has repeatedly been shown to predict cardiac risk. However, there is no consensus on the methods for the calculation of the angle. This study compared the reproducibility and predictive power of three most common ways of QRS-T angle assessment. Methods and results: Electrocardiograms of 352 healthy subjects, 941 survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI), and 605 patients recorded prior to the implantation of automatic defibrillator [implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)] were used to obtain QRS-T angle measurements by the maximum R to T (MRT), area R to T (ART), and total cosine R to T (TCRT) methods. The results were compared in terms of physiologic reproducibility and power to predict mortality in the cardiac patients during 5-year follow-up. Maximum R to T results were significantly less reproducible compared to the other two methods. Among both survivors of acute MI and ICD recipients, TCRT method was statistically significantly more powerful in predicting mortality during follow-up. Among the acute MI survivors, increased spatial QRS-T angle (TCRT assessment) was particularly powerful in predicting sudden cardiac death with the area under the receiver operator characteristic of 78% (90% confidence interval 63-90%). Among the ICD recipients, TCRT also predicted mortality significantly among patients with prolonged QRS complex duration when the spatial orientation of the QRS complex is poorly defined. Conclusion: The TCRT method for the assessment of spatial QRS-T angle appears to offer important advantages in comparison to other methods of measurement. This approach should be included in future clinical studies of the QRS-T angle. The TCRT method might also be a reasonable candidate for the standardization of the QRS-T angle assessment.
650    12
$a akční potenciály $7 D000200
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a srdeční arytmie $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001145
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a náhlá srdeční smrt $x epidemiologie $7 D016757
650    _2
$a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
650    _2
$a elektrická defibrilace $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D004554
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $x normy $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a srdeční frekvence $7 D006339
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $7 D009203
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Seegers, Joachim $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Barthel, Petra $u Innere Medizin I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Novotny, Tomas $u Department of internal medicine and cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Jihlavska 20, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Smetana, Peter $u Medizinische Abteilung mit Kardiologie, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Montleartstraße 37, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Zabel, Markus $u Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, Göttingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Georg $u Innere Medizin I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Malik, Marek $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Dovehouse Street, London, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00149837 $t Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 20, č. 8 (2018), s. 1352-1361
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29016907 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190815105550 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433876 $s 1067187
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 20 $c 8 $d 1352-1361 $e 20180801 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

    Možnosti archivace