-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity
J. Hatina, M. Boesch, S. Sopper, M. Kripnerova, D. Wolf, D. Reimer, C. Marth, AG. Zeimet,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
- MeSH
- epitelové buňky cytologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- membránové proteiny MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
- nádorové kmenové buňky cytologie MeSH
- nádory vaječníků patologie MeSH
- vejcovody cytologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Ovarian carcinoma features pronounced clinical, histopathological, and molecular heterogeneity. There is good reason to believe that parts of this heterogeneity can be explained by differences in the respective cell of origin, with a self-renewing fallopian tube secretory cell being likely responsible for initiation of an overwhelming majority of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (i.e., type II tumors according to the recent dualistic classification), whereas there are several mutually non-exclusive possibilities for the initiation of type I tumors, including ovarian surface epithelium stem cells, endometrial cells, or even cells of extra-Müllerian origin. Interestingly, both fallopian tube self-renewing secretory cells and ovarian surface epithelium stem cells seem to be characterized by an overlapping array of stemness signaling pathways, especially Wnt/β-catenin. Apart from this variability in the respective cell of origin, the particular clinical behavior of ovarian carcinoma strongly suggests an underlying stem cell component with a crucial impact. This becomes especially evident in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with classical chemotherapy, which entails a gradual evolution of chemoresistant disease without any apparent selection of clones carrying obvious chemoresistance-associated mutations. Several cell surface markers (e.g., CD24, CD44, CD117, CD133, and ROR1) as well as functional approaches (ALDEFLUOR™ and side population assays) have been used to identify and characterize putative ovarian carcinoma stem cells. We have recently shown that side population cells exhibit marked heterogeneity on their own, which can hamper their straightforward therapeutic targeting. An alternative strategy for stemness-depleting interventions is to target the stem cell niche, i.e., the specific microanatomical structure that secures stem cell maintenance and survival through provision of a set of stem cell-promoting and differentiation-antagonizing factors. Besides identifying direct or indirect therapeutic targets, profiling of side population cells and other ovarian carcinoma stem cell subpopulations can reveal relevant prognostic markers, as exemplified by our recent discovery of the Vav3.1 transcript variant, which filters out a fraction of prognostically unfavorable ovarian carcinoma cases.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Institute of Biology Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Internal Medicine 5 Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034539
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191010094816.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/978-3-030-14366-4_12 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31134503
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Hatina, Jiri $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity / $c J. Hatina, M. Boesch, S. Sopper, M. Kripnerova, D. Wolf, D. Reimer, C. Marth, AG. Zeimet,
- 520 9_
- $a Ovarian carcinoma features pronounced clinical, histopathological, and molecular heterogeneity. There is good reason to believe that parts of this heterogeneity can be explained by differences in the respective cell of origin, with a self-renewing fallopian tube secretory cell being likely responsible for initiation of an overwhelming majority of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (i.e., type II tumors according to the recent dualistic classification), whereas there are several mutually non-exclusive possibilities for the initiation of type I tumors, including ovarian surface epithelium stem cells, endometrial cells, or even cells of extra-Müllerian origin. Interestingly, both fallopian tube self-renewing secretory cells and ovarian surface epithelium stem cells seem to be characterized by an overlapping array of stemness signaling pathways, especially Wnt/β-catenin. Apart from this variability in the respective cell of origin, the particular clinical behavior of ovarian carcinoma strongly suggests an underlying stem cell component with a crucial impact. This becomes especially evident in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with classical chemotherapy, which entails a gradual evolution of chemoresistant disease without any apparent selection of clones carrying obvious chemoresistance-associated mutations. Several cell surface markers (e.g., CD24, CD44, CD117, CD133, and ROR1) as well as functional approaches (ALDEFLUOR™ and side population assays) have been used to identify and characterize putative ovarian carcinoma stem cells. We have recently shown that side population cells exhibit marked heterogeneity on their own, which can hamper their straightforward therapeutic targeting. An alternative strategy for stemness-depleting interventions is to target the stem cell niche, i.e., the specific microanatomical structure that secures stem cell maintenance and survival through provision of a set of stem cell-promoting and differentiation-antagonizing factors. Besides identifying direct or indirect therapeutic targets, profiling of side population cells and other ovarian carcinoma stem cell subpopulations can reveal relevant prognostic markers, as exemplified by our recent discovery of the Vav3.1 transcript variant, which filters out a fraction of prognostically unfavorable ovarian carcinoma cases.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a epitelové buňky $x cytologie $7 D004847
- 650 _2
- $a vejcovody $x cytologie $7 D005187
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a membránové proteiny $7 D008565
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové kmenové buňky $x cytologie $7 D014411
- 650 _2
- $a nádory vaječníků $x patologie $7 D010051
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Boesch, Maximilian $u Lungenzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Sopper, Sieghart $u Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Innsbruck, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Kripnerova, Michaela $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wolf, Dominik $u Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Reimer, Daniel $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Marth, Christian $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Zeimet, Alain G $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Alain.Zeimet@i-med.ac.at.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008501 $t Advances in experimental medicine and biology $x 0065-2598 $g Roč. 1139, č. - (2019), s. 201-221
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31134503 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191010095235 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451199 $s 1073089
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 1139 $c - $d 201-221 $e - $i 0065-2598 $m Advances in experimental medicine and biology $n Adv Exp Med Biol $x MED00008501
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007