• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity

J. Hatina, M. Boesch, S. Sopper, M. Kripnerova, D. Wolf, D. Reimer, C. Marth, AG. Zeimet,

. 2019 ; 1139 (-) : 201-221. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034539

Ovarian carcinoma features pronounced clinical, histopathological, and molecular heterogeneity. There is good reason to believe that parts of this heterogeneity can be explained by differences in the respective cell of origin, with a self-renewing fallopian tube secretory cell being likely responsible for initiation of an overwhelming majority of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (i.e., type II tumors according to the recent dualistic classification), whereas there are several mutually non-exclusive possibilities for the initiation of type I tumors, including ovarian surface epithelium stem cells, endometrial cells, or even cells of extra-Müllerian origin. Interestingly, both fallopian tube self-renewing secretory cells and ovarian surface epithelium stem cells seem to be characterized by an overlapping array of stemness signaling pathways, especially Wnt/β-catenin. Apart from this variability in the respective cell of origin, the particular clinical behavior of ovarian carcinoma strongly suggests an underlying stem cell component with a crucial impact. This becomes especially evident in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with classical chemotherapy, which entails a gradual evolution of chemoresistant disease without any apparent selection of clones carrying obvious chemoresistance-associated mutations. Several cell surface markers (e.g., CD24, CD44, CD117, CD133, and ROR1) as well as functional approaches (ALDEFLUOR™ and side population assays) have been used to identify and characterize putative ovarian carcinoma stem cells. We have recently shown that side population cells exhibit marked heterogeneity on their own, which can hamper their straightforward therapeutic targeting. An alternative strategy for stemness-depleting interventions is to target the stem cell niche, i.e., the specific microanatomical structure that secures stem cell maintenance and survival through provision of a set of stem cell-promoting and differentiation-antagonizing factors. Besides identifying direct or indirect therapeutic targets, profiling of side population cells and other ovarian carcinoma stem cell subpopulations can reveal relevant prognostic markers, as exemplified by our recent discovery of the Vav3.1 transcript variant, which filters out a fraction of prognostically unfavorable ovarian carcinoma cases.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034539
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191010094816.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/978-3-030-14366-4_12 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31134503
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hatina, Jiri $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity / $c J. Hatina, M. Boesch, S. Sopper, M. Kripnerova, D. Wolf, D. Reimer, C. Marth, AG. Zeimet,
520    9_
$a Ovarian carcinoma features pronounced clinical, histopathological, and molecular heterogeneity. There is good reason to believe that parts of this heterogeneity can be explained by differences in the respective cell of origin, with a self-renewing fallopian tube secretory cell being likely responsible for initiation of an overwhelming majority of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (i.e., type II tumors according to the recent dualistic classification), whereas there are several mutually non-exclusive possibilities for the initiation of type I tumors, including ovarian surface epithelium stem cells, endometrial cells, or even cells of extra-Müllerian origin. Interestingly, both fallopian tube self-renewing secretory cells and ovarian surface epithelium stem cells seem to be characterized by an overlapping array of stemness signaling pathways, especially Wnt/β-catenin. Apart from this variability in the respective cell of origin, the particular clinical behavior of ovarian carcinoma strongly suggests an underlying stem cell component with a crucial impact. This becomes especially evident in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with classical chemotherapy, which entails a gradual evolution of chemoresistant disease without any apparent selection of clones carrying obvious chemoresistance-associated mutations. Several cell surface markers (e.g., CD24, CD44, CD117, CD133, and ROR1) as well as functional approaches (ALDEFLUOR™ and side population assays) have been used to identify and characterize putative ovarian carcinoma stem cells. We have recently shown that side population cells exhibit marked heterogeneity on their own, which can hamper their straightforward therapeutic targeting. An alternative strategy for stemness-depleting interventions is to target the stem cell niche, i.e., the specific microanatomical structure that secures stem cell maintenance and survival through provision of a set of stem cell-promoting and differentiation-antagonizing factors. Besides identifying direct or indirect therapeutic targets, profiling of side population cells and other ovarian carcinoma stem cell subpopulations can reveal relevant prognostic markers, as exemplified by our recent discovery of the Vav3.1 transcript variant, which filters out a fraction of prognostically unfavorable ovarian carcinoma cases.
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $7 D014408
650    _2
$a epitelové buňky $x cytologie $7 D004847
650    _2
$a vejcovody $x cytologie $7 D005187
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a membránové proteiny $7 D008565
650    _2
$a nádorové kmenové buňky $x cytologie $7 D014411
650    _2
$a nádory vaječníků $x patologie $7 D010051
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Boesch, Maximilian $u Lungenzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Sopper, Sieghart $u Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Kripnerova, Michaela $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wolf, Dominik $u Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Reimer, Daniel $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Marth, Christian $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Zeimet, Alain G $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Alain.Zeimet@i-med.ac.at.
773    0_
$w MED00008501 $t Advances in experimental medicine and biology $x 0065-2598 $g Roč. 1139, č. - (2019), s. 201-221
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31134503 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191010095235 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451199 $s 1073089
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 1139 $c - $d 201-221 $e - $i 0065-2598 $m Advances in experimental medicine and biology $n Adv Exp Med Biol $x MED00008501
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...