-
Something wrong with this record ?
Prevention of esophageal strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection
J. Martínek, S. Juhas, R. Dolezel, B. Walterová, J. Juhasova, J. Klima, Z. Rabekova, Z. Vacková,
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article, Review
Grant support
NV16-27653A
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection * methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Postoperative Complications etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Esophageal Stenosis etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Endoscopic submucosal dissection or widespread endoscopic resection allow the radical removal of circumferential or near-circumferential neoplastic esophageal lesions. The advantage of these endoscopic methods is mini-invasivity and low risk of major adverse events compared to traditional esophagectomy. The major drawback of these extensive resections is the development of stricture - the risk is 70-80% if more than 75% of the circumference is removed and almost 100% if the whole circumference is removed. Thus, an effective method to prevent post-ER/ESD esophageal stricture would be of major benefit, because treatment of strictures requires multiple sessions of endoscopic dilatation and may carry a risk of perforation. Moreover, not all strictures are easy to treat and some patients may develop refractory strictures. There are several techniques and methods, which have been tested in both experimental and/or clinical studies but no one has received general acceptance based on results of high-quality evidence. The studies are usually small with a limited number of patients, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials and some techniques have been described only in experimental studies. Thus, prevention of post-ESD strictures remains an unresolved issue. On the other hand, because of the high risk of stricture and partially proven effectiveness of some preventive techniques, a preventive strategy should be considered in patients undergoing extensive ER/ESD in the esophagus. There is, however, no evidence about the superiority or inferiority of a particular preventive strategy compared to other techniques, moreover, there is paucity of data assessing the effectiveness of the combination of different preventive methods. The best preventive strategies known so far include 1) oral or local administration of corticosteroids; and 2) preventive stenting. Other strategies (preventive sessions of endoscopic dilatation or tissue engineering methods) have unproven efficacy or are too demanding for practical use. Nevertheless, the use of (any) preventive strategy after extensive ER/ESD of the esophagus probably reduces the risk of stricture and the number of endoscopic dilatations, therefore, it should be considered in these patients. However, there is a need for high quality evidence as well as for new ideas and approaches to resolve this important clinical problem.
Department of Hepatogastroenterology IKEM Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR v v i Libechov Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19035224
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191011122627.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2018 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07751-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29795068
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Martínek, Jan $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic - jan.martinek@volny.cz. Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic - jan.martinek@volny.cz. Institute of Physiology - jan.martinek@volny.cz. st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - jan.martinek@volny.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Prevention of esophageal strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection / $c J. Martínek, S. Juhas, R. Dolezel, B. Walterová, J. Juhasova, J. Klima, Z. Rabekova, Z. Vacková,
- 520 9_
- $a Endoscopic submucosal dissection or widespread endoscopic resection allow the radical removal of circumferential or near-circumferential neoplastic esophageal lesions. The advantage of these endoscopic methods is mini-invasivity and low risk of major adverse events compared to traditional esophagectomy. The major drawback of these extensive resections is the development of stricture - the risk is 70-80% if more than 75% of the circumference is removed and almost 100% if the whole circumference is removed. Thus, an effective method to prevent post-ER/ESD esophageal stricture would be of major benefit, because treatment of strictures requires multiple sessions of endoscopic dilatation and may carry a risk of perforation. Moreover, not all strictures are easy to treat and some patients may develop refractory strictures. There are several techniques and methods, which have been tested in both experimental and/or clinical studies but no one has received general acceptance based on results of high-quality evidence. The studies are usually small with a limited number of patients, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials and some techniques have been described only in experimental studies. Thus, prevention of post-ESD strictures remains an unresolved issue. On the other hand, because of the high risk of stricture and partially proven effectiveness of some preventive techniques, a preventive strategy should be considered in patients undergoing extensive ER/ESD in the esophagus. There is, however, no evidence about the superiority or inferiority of a particular preventive strategy compared to other techniques, moreover, there is paucity of data assessing the effectiveness of the combination of different preventive methods. The best preventive strategies known so far include 1) oral or local administration of corticosteroids; and 2) preventive stenting. Other strategies (preventive sessions of endoscopic dilatation or tissue engineering methods) have unproven efficacy or are too demanding for practical use. Nevertheless, the use of (any) preventive strategy after extensive ER/ESD of the esophagus probably reduces the risk of stricture and the number of endoscopic dilatations, therefore, it should be considered in these patients. However, there is a need for high quality evidence as well as for new ideas and approaches to resolve this important clinical problem.
- 650 12
- $a endoskopická mukózní resekce $x metody $7 D000069916
- 650 _2
- $a stenóza jícnu $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D004940
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Juhas, Stefan $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dolezel, Radek $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic. Ostrava University, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Walterová, Barbora $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Juhasova, Jana $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Klima, Jiri $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR, v.v.i, Libechov, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rabekova, Zuzana $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vacková, Zuzana $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003366 $t Minerva chirurgica $x 1827-1626 $g Roč. 73, č. 4 (2018), s. 394-409
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29795068 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191011123047 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451884 $s 1073774
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 73 $c 4 $d 394-409 $e 20180524 $i 1827-1626 $m Minerva chirurgica $n Minerva Chir $x MED00003366
- GRA __
- $a NV16-27653A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007