• Something wrong with this record ?

Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty

E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, S. Lejeune, A. Berrebi, P. Zacek, M. Debauchez,

. 2017 ; 153 (5) : 1033-1042. [pub] 20170111

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study, Video-Audio Media

OBJECTIVE: Although the remodeling technique provides the most dynamic valve-sparing root replacement, a dilated annulus (>25 mm) is a risk factor for failure. Aortic annuloplasty aims to reduce the annulus diameter, thus increasing coaptation height to protect the repair. The results of 177 patients with remodeling and external aortic ring annuloplasty were studied. METHODS: Data were collected from the Aortic Valve repair InternATiOnal Registry. Preoperative aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater was present in 79 patients (44.7%). The valve was bicuspid in 59 patients (33.3%). External annuloplasty was performed through a homemade Dacron ring (56) or a dedicated expansible aortic ring (121). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 2.9% (5). Mean follow-up was 41.1 ± 36.4 months. For the whole series, freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events were 89.5%, 90.5%, 77.4%, and 86.6% at 7 years, respectively, with similar results for tricuspid and bicuspid valves. Since 2007, systematic use of calibrated expansible ring annuloplasty, followed 1 year later by systematic cusp effective height assessment, significantly increased 7-year freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events up to 99.1% ± 0.9% (P = .017), 100% (P = .026), and 96.3% ± 1.8% (P = .035), respectively, whereas freedom from aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater remained unaffected (78.1% ± 7.6%). Calibrated annuloplasty and effective height assessment were identified as protective factors from reoperation: hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.06; P = .057 and hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.95; P = .044, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The standardization of remodeling root repair with calibrated expansible aortic ring annuloplasty and cusp effective height assessment improves valve repair outcomes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035626
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191014122406.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.031 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28187973
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lansac, Emmanuel $u Department of Cardiac Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France. Electronic address: emmanuel.lansac@imm.fr.
245    10
$a Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty / $c E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, S. Lejeune, A. Berrebi, P. Zacek, M. Debauchez,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Although the remodeling technique provides the most dynamic valve-sparing root replacement, a dilated annulus (>25 mm) is a risk factor for failure. Aortic annuloplasty aims to reduce the annulus diameter, thus increasing coaptation height to protect the repair. The results of 177 patients with remodeling and external aortic ring annuloplasty were studied. METHODS: Data were collected from the Aortic Valve repair InternATiOnal Registry. Preoperative aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater was present in 79 patients (44.7%). The valve was bicuspid in 59 patients (33.3%). External annuloplasty was performed through a homemade Dacron ring (56) or a dedicated expansible aortic ring (121). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 2.9% (5). Mean follow-up was 41.1 ± 36.4 months. For the whole series, freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events were 89.5%, 90.5%, 77.4%, and 86.6% at 7 years, respectively, with similar results for tricuspid and bicuspid valves. Since 2007, systematic use of calibrated expansible ring annuloplasty, followed 1 year later by systematic cusp effective height assessment, significantly increased 7-year freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events up to 99.1% ± 0.9% (P = .017), 100% (P = .026), and 96.3% ± 1.8% (P = .035), respectively, whereas freedom from aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater remained unaffected (78.1% ± 7.6%). Calibrated annuloplasty and effective height assessment were identified as protective factors from reoperation: hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.06; P = .057 and hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.95; P = .044, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The standardization of remodeling root repair with calibrated expansible aortic ring annuloplasty and cusp effective height assessment improves valve repair outcomes.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a aorta $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001011
650    _2
$a aortální aneurysma $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001014
650    _2
$a aortální chlopeň $x abnormality $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001021
650    _2
$a aortální insuficience $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001022
650    12
$a cévní protézy $7 D001807
650    _2
$a cévy - implantace protéz $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x mortalita $7 D019917
650    _2
$a anuloplastika srdeční chlopně $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x mortalita $7 D058385
650    _2
$a barevná dopplerovská echokardiografie $7 D018618
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a nemoci srdečních chlopní $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D006349
650    12
$a srdeční chlopně umělé $7 D006350
650    _2
$a chirurgická náhrada chlopně $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x mortalita $7 D019918
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a polyethylentereftaláty $7 D011093
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a doba přežití bez progrese choroby $7 D000077982
650    _2
$a protézy - design $7 D011474
650    _2
$a obnova funkce $7 D020127
650    _2
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Francie $7 D005602
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a audiovizuální média $7 D059040
700    1_
$a Di Centa, Isabelle $u Vascular Surgery Unit, Hopital Foch, Suresnes, France.
700    1_
$a Sleilaty, Ghassan $u Department of Cardiac Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Lejeune, Stephanie $u Department of Cardiac Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Berrebi, Alain $u Department of Cardiac Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Zacek, Pavel $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Debauchez, Mathieu $u Department of Cardiac Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
773    0_
$w MED00003020 $t The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery $x 1097-685X $g Roč. 153, č. 5 (2017), s. 1033-1042
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28187973 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191014122830 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452286 $s 1074176
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 153 $c 5 $d 1033-1042 $e 20170111 $i 1097-685X $m Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery $n J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg $x MED00003020
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...