• Something wrong with this record ?

Heterogeneity of Bile Duct Management in the Development of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Liver Transplantation: Results of a European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association Survey

N. Meurisse, D. Monbaliu, G. Berlakovich, P. Muiesan, M. Oliverius, R. Adam, J. Pirenne,

. 2019 ; 51 (6) : 1926-1933. [pub] 20190710

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Surgical factors and direct cytotoxicity of bile salts on cholangiocytes may play a role in the development of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after liver transplantation (LTx). There is no validated consensus on how to protect the bile ducts during procurement, static preservation, and LTx. Meanwhile, IC remains the most troublesome complication after LTx. AIM: To characterize bile duct management techniques during the LTx process among European transplant centers in cases of donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD). METHOD: An European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association-European Liver Transplant Registry web survey designed to conceal respondents' personal information was sent to surgeons procuring and/or transplanting livers in Europe. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of responses came from large transplant centers (>50 procurements/y). In 8% of DBDs and 14% of DCDs the bile duct is not rinsed. In 46% of DBDs and 52% of DCDs surgeons prefer to remove the gallbladder after graft reperfusion. Protocols concerning preservation solutions (nature, pressure, volume) are extremely heterogeneous. In 54% of DBDs and 61% of DCDs an arterial back table pressure perfusion is performed. Steroids (20%-10%), heparin (72%-60%), prostacyclin (3%-7%), and fibrinolytics (4%-11%) are used as donor-protective interventions in DBD and DCD cases, respectively. In 2% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases a hepatic artery reperfusion is performed first. In 4% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases, fibrinolytics are administered through the hepatic artery during the bench and/or implantation. CONCLUSION: This European web survey shows for the first time the heterogeneity in the management of bile ducts during procurement, preservation, and transplantation in Europe. In the context of sharing more marginal liver grafts, an expert meeting must be organized to formulate guidelines to be applied to protect liver grafts against IC.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044666
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200120103542.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.018 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31301856
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Meurisse, Nicolas $u Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University of Liege Academic Hospital, ULg CHU, Liege, Belgium; Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
245    10
$a Heterogeneity of Bile Duct Management in the Development of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Liver Transplantation: Results of a European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association Survey / $c N. Meurisse, D. Monbaliu, G. Berlakovich, P. Muiesan, M. Oliverius, R. Adam, J. Pirenne,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Surgical factors and direct cytotoxicity of bile salts on cholangiocytes may play a role in the development of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after liver transplantation (LTx). There is no validated consensus on how to protect the bile ducts during procurement, static preservation, and LTx. Meanwhile, IC remains the most troublesome complication after LTx. AIM: To characterize bile duct management techniques during the LTx process among European transplant centers in cases of donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD). METHOD: An European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association-European Liver Transplant Registry web survey designed to conceal respondents' personal information was sent to surgeons procuring and/or transplanting livers in Europe. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of responses came from large transplant centers (>50 procurements/y). In 8% of DBDs and 14% of DCDs the bile duct is not rinsed. In 46% of DBDs and 52% of DCDs surgeons prefer to remove the gallbladder after graft reperfusion. Protocols concerning preservation solutions (nature, pressure, volume) are extremely heterogeneous. In 54% of DBDs and 61% of DCDs an arterial back table pressure perfusion is performed. Steroids (20%-10%), heparin (72%-60%), prostacyclin (3%-7%), and fibrinolytics (4%-11%) are used as donor-protective interventions in DBD and DCD cases, respectively. In 2% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases a hepatic artery reperfusion is performed first. In 4% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases, fibrinolytics are administered through the hepatic artery during the bench and/or implantation. CONCLUSION: This European web survey shows for the first time the heterogeneity in the management of bile ducts during procurement, preservation, and transplantation in Europe. In the context of sharing more marginal liver grafts, an expert meeting must be organized to formulate guidelines to be applied to protect liver grafts against IC.
650    _2
$a žlučové cesty $x krevní zásobení $x transplantace $7 D001652
650    _2
$a cholangitida $x etiologie $7 D002761
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a přežívání štěpu $7 D006085
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ischemie $x etiologie $7 D007511
650    _2
$a transplantace jater $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016031
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a uchovávání orgánů $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D009926
650    _2
$a perfuze $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D010477
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a reperfuze $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D015424
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a odběr tkání a orgánů $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D020858
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Monbaliu, Diethard $u Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Berlakovich, Gabriela $u Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Muiesan, Paolo $u Liver Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Oliverius, Martin $u Department of Surgery of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Adam, René $u APHP Hospital Paul Brousse, Inserm U985, University Paris Sud, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Pirenne, Jacques $u Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: jacques.pirenne@uzleuven.be.
773    0_
$w MED00004556 $t Transplantation proceedings $x 1873-2623 $g Roč. 51, č. 6 (2019), s. 1926-1933
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31301856 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200120103918 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1482935 $s 1083339
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 51 $c 6 $d 1926-1933 $e 20190710 $i 1873-2623 $m Transplantation proceedings $n Transplant Proc $x MED00004556
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...