-
Something wrong with this record ?
Cryopreservation and transplantation of common carp spermatogonia
R. Franěk, Z. Marinović, J. Lujić, B. Urbányi, M. Fučíková, V. Kašpar, M. Pšenička, Á. Horváth,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Dimethyl Sulfoxide pharmacology MeSH
- Carps * MeSH
- Cryopreservation * MeSH
- Spermatogonia * cytology transplantation MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) is one of the most cultured fish species over the world with many different breeds and plenty of published protocols for sperm cryopreservation. However, data regarding preservation of gonadal tissue and surrogate production is still missing. A protocol for freezing common carp spermatogonia was developed through varying different factors along a set of serial subsequent experiments. Among the six cryoprotectants tested, the best survival was achieved with dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). In the next experiment, a wide range of cooling rates (0.5-10°C/min) and different concentrations of Me2SO were tested resulting in the highest survival achieved using 2 M Me2SO and cooling rate of -1°C/min. When testing different tissue sizes and incubation times in the cryomedia, the highest viability was observed when incubating 100 mg tissue fragments for 30 min. Finally, sugar supplementation did not yield significant differences. When testing different equilibration (ES) and vitrification solutions (VS) used for needle-immersed vitrification, no significant differences were observed between the tested groups. Additionally, varied exposure time to VS did not improve the vitrification outcome where the viability was 4-fold lower than that of freezing. The functionality of cryopreserved cells was tested by interspecific transplantation into sterilized goldfish recipients. The exogenous origin of the germ cells in gonads of goldfish recipient was confirmed by molecular markers and incorporation rate was over 40% at 3 months post-transplantation. Results of this study can serve for long-term preservation of germplasm in carp which can be recovered in a surrogate recipient.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19044875
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113081419.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0205481 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30998742
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Franěk, Roman $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Cryopreservation and transplantation of common carp spermatogonia / $c R. Franěk, Z. Marinović, J. Lujić, B. Urbányi, M. Fučíková, V. Kašpar, M. Pšenička, Á. Horváth,
- 520 9_
- $a Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) is one of the most cultured fish species over the world with many different breeds and plenty of published protocols for sperm cryopreservation. However, data regarding preservation of gonadal tissue and surrogate production is still missing. A protocol for freezing common carp spermatogonia was developed through varying different factors along a set of serial subsequent experiments. Among the six cryoprotectants tested, the best survival was achieved with dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). In the next experiment, a wide range of cooling rates (0.5-10°C/min) and different concentrations of Me2SO were tested resulting in the highest survival achieved using 2 M Me2SO and cooling rate of -1°C/min. When testing different tissue sizes and incubation times in the cryomedia, the highest viability was observed when incubating 100 mg tissue fragments for 30 min. Finally, sugar supplementation did not yield significant differences. When testing different equilibration (ES) and vitrification solutions (VS) used for needle-immersed vitrification, no significant differences were observed between the tested groups. Additionally, varied exposure time to VS did not improve the vitrification outcome where the viability was 4-fold lower than that of freezing. The functionality of cryopreserved cells was tested by interspecific transplantation into sterilized goldfish recipients. The exogenous origin of the germ cells in gonads of goldfish recipient was confirmed by molecular markers and incorporation rate was over 40% at 3 months post-transplantation. Results of this study can serve for long-term preservation of germplasm in carp which can be recovered in a surrogate recipient.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a kapři $7 D002347
- 650 12
- $a kryoprezervace $7 D015925
- 650 _2
- $a dimethylsulfoxid $x farmakologie $7 D004121
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a spermatogonie $x cytologie $x transplantace $7 D013093
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Marinović, Zoran $u Department of Aquaculture, Szent István University, Gödöllö, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Lujić, Jelena $u Department of Aquaculture, Szent István University, Gödöllö, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Urbányi, Béla $u Department of Aquaculture, Szent István University, Gödöllö, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Fučíková, Michaela $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kašpar, Vojtěch $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pšenička, Martin $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Horváth, Ákos $u Department of Aquaculture, Szent István University, Gödöllö, Hungary.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 4 (2019), s. e0205481
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30998742 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113081751 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483144 $s 1083548
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 14 $c 4 $d e0205481 $e 20190418 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109