• Something wrong with this record ?

Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy

E. Kuthanová Trsková, E. Belgio, AM. Yeates, R. Sobotka, AV. Ruban, R. Kana,

. 2018 ; 69 (18) : 4483-4493. [pub] 20180814

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pKa for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are 'natural quenchers' ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045392
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113082137.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/jxb/ery240 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29955883
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
245    10
$a Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy / $c E. Kuthanová Trsková, E. Belgio, AM. Yeates, R. Sobotka, AV. Ruban, R. Kana,
520    9_
$a Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pKa for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are 'natural quenchers' ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.
650    _2
$a bílkoviny řas $x metabolismus $7 D020418
650    _2
$a Alveolata $x fyziologie $7 D056893
650    _2
$a světlosběrné proteinové komplexy $x metabolismus $7 D045342
650    12
$a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
650    _2
$a rostlinné proteiny $x metabolismus $7 D010940
650    12
$a protony $7 D011522
650    _2
$a protozoální proteiny $x metabolismus $7 D015800
650    _2
$a Spinacia oleracea $x fyziologie $7 D018724
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Belgio, Erica $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Trebon, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Yeates, Anna M $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Trebon, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sobotka, Roman $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
700    1_
$a Ruban, Alexander V $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Kana, Radek $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
773    0_
$w MED00006559 $t Journal of experimental botany $x 1460-2431 $g Roč. 69, č. 18 (2018), s. 4483-4493
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29955883 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113082509 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483661 $s 1084065
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 69 $c 18 $d 4483-4493 $e 20180814 $i 1460-2431 $m Journal of Experimental Botany $n J Exp Bot $x MED00006559
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...