-
Something wrong with this record ?
Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
E. Kuthanová Trsková, E. Belgio, AM. Yeates, R. Sobotka, AV. Ruban, R. Kana,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1996 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1996-01-01
PubMed
29955883
DOI
10.1093/jxb/ery240
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Alveolata physiology MeSH
- Algal Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Photosynthesis * MeSH
- Protons * MeSH
- Protozoan Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Plant Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Spinacia oleracea physiology MeSH
- Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pKa for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are 'natural quenchers' ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19045392
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113082137.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/jxb/ery240 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29955883
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
- 245 10
- $a Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy / $c E. Kuthanová Trsková, E. Belgio, AM. Yeates, R. Sobotka, AV. Ruban, R. Kana,
- 520 9_
- $a Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pKa for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are 'natural quenchers' ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.
- 650 _2
- $a bílkoviny řas $x metabolismus $7 D020418
- 650 _2
- $a Alveolata $x fyziologie $7 D056893
- 650 _2
- $a světlosběrné proteinové komplexy $x metabolismus $7 D045342
- 650 12
- $a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné proteiny $x metabolismus $7 D010940
- 650 12
- $a protony $7 D011522
- 650 _2
- $a protozoální proteiny $x metabolismus $7 D015800
- 650 _2
- $a Spinacia oleracea $x fyziologie $7 D018724
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Belgio, Erica $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Trebon, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Yeates, Anna M $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Trebon, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sobotka, Roman $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ruban, Alexander V $u School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Kana, Radek $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Science, Branišovská, České Budějovice, Czech republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006559 $t Journal of experimental botany $x 1460-2431 $g Roč. 69, č. 18 (2018), s. 4483-4493
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29955883 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113082509 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483661 $s 1084065
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 69 $c 18 $d 4483-4493 $e 20180814 $i 1460-2431 $m Journal of Experimental Botany $n J Exp Bot $x MED00006559
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109