Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Cinnarizine 20 mg and Dimenhydrinate 40 mg vs Betahistine Dihydrochloride 16 mg in Patients with Peripheral Vestibular Vertigo: A Prospective, Multinational, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

AW. Scholtz, A. Hahn, B. Stefflova, D. Medzhidieva, SV. Ryazantsev, A. Paschinin, N. Kunelskaya, K. Schumacher, G. Weisshaar,

. 2019 ; 39 (11) : 1045-1056. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20005841
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2008-06-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2008-06-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vertigo derived from peripheral vestibular disorders is quite frequently encountered in daily clinical practice and can be a severely disabling symptom associated with substantial impairment of health-related quality of life for the affected patients. Betahistine, a structural analogue of histamine and presumably the most widely prescribed anti-vertigo drug worldwide, has previously been shown to be an effective and safe treatment for these patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether the fixed combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate (Arlevert®) is non-inferior and thus a potentially useful alternative to betahistine dihydrochloride in the treatment of patients suffering from peripheral vestibular vertigo. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial, outpatients from 8 ENT clinics in Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Russia were randomly assigned to receive three times daily one tablet of either the fixed combination cinnarizine 20 mg/dimenhydrinate 40 mg or betahistine dihydrochloride 16 mg for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was the reduction of the mean vertigo score (MVS), a validated 12-item composite score defined as the mean of 6 vertigo symptoms (dystasia and walking unsteadiness, staggering, rotary sensation, tendency to fall, lift sensation, blackout) and 6 trigger factors for vertigo (change of position, bowing, getting up, driving by car/train, head movements, eye movement), after 4 weeks of therapy, as judged by the patient on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS). The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.3. Secondary outcomes included the patient's and investigator's judgment of global efficacy, the patient's rating of impairment of daily activities, and safety/tolerability of the treatments. RESULTS: Three hundred and six patients (mean age 53.5 years, approximately 60% female) were enrolled and randomized to the fixed combination cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate (n = 152) or betahistine (n = 154) groups; 297 patients completed the study and 294 (146 and 148, respectively) were valid for the per-protocol analysis, which was used for the non-inferiority analysis. Treatment with cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate led to a stronger reduction of the MVS [least squares mean (LSM)] after 4-week therapy (primary endpoint) in comparison to betahistine (0.395 vs 0.488; difference: - 0.093, 95% CI - 0.180; - 0.007, p = 0.035); since the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was not only below the non-inferiority margin of 0.3, but also entirely below 0, superiority of the fixed combination could be demonstrated. The combination preparation was also more effective after 1 week of therapy and received more favorable patient's ratings on overall efficacy and impairment of daily activities. Both treatments were very well tolerated. Only 12 patients (3.92%) reported 13 non-serious adverse events; 2 cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate-treated patients discontinued the study prematurely due to adverse events as compared to 5 betahistine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg was found to be not only non-inferior, but superior to betahistine 16 mg in the improvement of peripheral vestibular vertigo. Furthermore, taking into account a good and slightly favorable safety profile, the present study provides evidence that the fixed-combination preparation is a potent and even superior alternative to betahistine in the treatment of vertigo related to peripheral vestibular disorders. STUDY REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2011-004025-27.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20005841
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200521092027.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 nz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s40261-019-00858-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31571128
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a nz
100    1_
$a Scholtz, Arne W $u ENT Clinic, Medical University of Innsbruck, and ENT Center for Vertigo, Innsbruck, Austria.
245    10
$a Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Cinnarizine 20 mg and Dimenhydrinate 40 mg vs Betahistine Dihydrochloride 16 mg in Patients with Peripheral Vestibular Vertigo: A Prospective, Multinational, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial / $c AW. Scholtz, A. Hahn, B. Stefflova, D. Medzhidieva, SV. Ryazantsev, A. Paschinin, N. Kunelskaya, K. Schumacher, G. Weisshaar,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vertigo derived from peripheral vestibular disorders is quite frequently encountered in daily clinical practice and can be a severely disabling symptom associated with substantial impairment of health-related quality of life for the affected patients. Betahistine, a structural analogue of histamine and presumably the most widely prescribed anti-vertigo drug worldwide, has previously been shown to be an effective and safe treatment for these patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether the fixed combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate (Arlevert®) is non-inferior and thus a potentially useful alternative to betahistine dihydrochloride in the treatment of patients suffering from peripheral vestibular vertigo. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial, outpatients from 8 ENT clinics in Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Russia were randomly assigned to receive three times daily one tablet of either the fixed combination cinnarizine 20 mg/dimenhydrinate 40 mg or betahistine dihydrochloride 16 mg for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was the reduction of the mean vertigo score (MVS), a validated 12-item composite score defined as the mean of 6 vertigo symptoms (dystasia and walking unsteadiness, staggering, rotary sensation, tendency to fall, lift sensation, blackout) and 6 trigger factors for vertigo (change of position, bowing, getting up, driving by car/train, head movements, eye movement), after 4 weeks of therapy, as judged by the patient on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS). The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.3. Secondary outcomes included the patient's and investigator's judgment of global efficacy, the patient's rating of impairment of daily activities, and safety/tolerability of the treatments. RESULTS: Three hundred and six patients (mean age 53.5 years, approximately 60% female) were enrolled and randomized to the fixed combination cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate (n = 152) or betahistine (n = 154) groups; 297 patients completed the study and 294 (146 and 148, respectively) were valid for the per-protocol analysis, which was used for the non-inferiority analysis. Treatment with cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate led to a stronger reduction of the MVS [least squares mean (LSM)] after 4-week therapy (primary endpoint) in comparison to betahistine (0.395 vs 0.488; difference: - 0.093, 95% CI - 0.180; - 0.007, p = 0.035); since the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was not only below the non-inferiority margin of 0.3, but also entirely below 0, superiority of the fixed combination could be demonstrated. The combination preparation was also more effective after 1 week of therapy and received more favorable patient's ratings on overall efficacy and impairment of daily activities. Both treatments were very well tolerated. Only 12 patients (3.92%) reported 13 non-serious adverse events; 2 cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate-treated patients discontinued the study prematurely due to adverse events as compared to 5 betahistine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg was found to be not only non-inferior, but superior to betahistine 16 mg in the improvement of peripheral vestibular vertigo. Furthermore, taking into account a good and slightly favorable safety profile, the present study provides evidence that the fixed-combination preparation is a potent and even superior alternative to betahistine in the treatment of vertigo related to peripheral vestibular disorders. STUDY REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2011-004025-27.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a betahistin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D001621
650    _2
$a cinarizin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D002936
650    _2
$a dimenhydrinát $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D004111
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a fixní kombinace léků $7 D004338
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a vertigo $x farmakoterapie $7 D014717
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Hahn, Ales $u ENT Clinic, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stefflova, Bohdana $u ENT Clinic, Regional Hospital Budweis, Budweis, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Medzhidieva, Daniela $u ENT Clinic, Medical University of Sofia-St. Ivan Rilski Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
700    1_
$a Ryazantsev, Sergey V $u Federal State Institution St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia.
700    1_
$a Paschinin, Alexander $u North West State Medical University n. a. I.I. Mechnikov of Ministry of Health and Social Development, St. Petersburg, Russia.
700    1_
$a Kunelskaya, Natalia $u Moscow Research-Practical Center of Otolaryngology n. a. L. I. Sverzhevsky, Moscow, Russia.
700    1_
$a Schumacher, Kai $u Berlin-Chemie AG/Menarini, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Weisshaar, Gerhard $u Hennig Arzneimittel, Flörsheim am Main, Germany. gerhard.weisshaar@hennig-am.de.
773    0_
$w MED00001123 $t Clinical drug investigation $x 1179-1918 $g Roč. 39, č. 11 (2019), s. 1045-1056
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31571128 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200521092024 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1524699 $s 1095897
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 39 $c 11 $d 1045-1056 $e - $i 1179-1918 $m Clinical drug investigation $n Clin. drug invest. $x MED00001123
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...