-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Nailing osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures
Jan Polášek, Radek Veselý, Radim Suchomel
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie
- Klíčová slova
- hřebová osteosyntéza,
- MeSH
- fraktury humeru * chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování terapie MeSH
- humerus chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- intramedulární fixace fraktury * metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- kostní hřeby škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- osteonekróza etiologie komplikace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- hodnotící studie MeSH
Introduction: One of the surgical methods to manage proximal humeral fractures is the nailing osteosynthesis, which reports good results for certain spectre of fractures. At the Trauma Hospital in Brno is has therefore become the method of choice for type A fractures and a part of type B fractures according to the AO. Objective: The objective of our work was to evaluate clinical results of osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures managed by nailing osteosynthesis. Method: 95 patients operated for proximal humeral fracture by antegrade nailing at the Trauma Hospital in Brno in 2014-2018 were enrolled in the retrospective study. Healing time, resulting mobility range, and number of complications were evaluated. Results: The nailing osteosynthesis was used in 34 % of all 391patients operated due to proximal humeral fracture. The average age was 61 years. 95 patients were included in the study. Complete extraction of metal was performed in 7 patients and partial extraction was performed in 7 patients. Pseudoarthrosis formed in 2 patients; necrosis of the head occurred in 4 patients. No significant differences in results were found in two most frequently used nails. Conclusion: Nailing osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures is a reliable method for the indicated fractures, with results comparable to those of plating osteosynthesis, particularly in respect of type AO A2 and B fractures.
Překlad
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20010373
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201202130547.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200709s2020 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Polášek, Jan $7 xx0248727 $u Nemocnice Ivančice
- 245 10
- $a Nailing osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures / $c Jan Polášek, Radek Veselý, Radim Suchomel
- 500 __
- $a Překlad
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: One of the surgical methods to manage proximal humeral fractures is the nailing osteosynthesis, which reports good results for certain spectre of fractures. At the Trauma Hospital in Brno is has therefore become the method of choice for type A fractures and a part of type B fractures according to the AO. Objective: The objective of our work was to evaluate clinical results of osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures managed by nailing osteosynthesis. Method: 95 patients operated for proximal humeral fracture by antegrade nailing at the Trauma Hospital in Brno in 2014-2018 were enrolled in the retrospective study. Healing time, resulting mobility range, and number of complications were evaluated. Results: The nailing osteosynthesis was used in 34 % of all 391patients operated due to proximal humeral fracture. The average age was 61 years. 95 patients were included in the study. Complete extraction of metal was performed in 7 patients and partial extraction was performed in 7 patients. Pseudoarthrosis formed in 2 patients; necrosis of the head occurred in 4 patients. No significant differences in results were found in two most frequently used nails. Conclusion: Nailing osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures is a reliable method for the indicated fractures, with results comparable to those of plating osteosynthesis, particularly in respect of type AO A2 and B fractures.
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D005593
- 650 12
- $a fraktury humeru $x chirurgie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D006810
- 650 12
- $a intramedulární fixace fraktury $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D005594
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a kostní hřeby $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001858
- 650 _2
- $a osteonekróza $x etiologie $x komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D010020
- 650 _2
- $a humerus $x chirurgie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006811
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 653 00
- $a hřebová osteosyntéza
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 700 1_
- $a Veselý, Radek, $d 1972- $7 mzk2011673138 $u Úrazová nemocnice, Brno; Klinika traumatologie LF MU, Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Suchomel, Radomír $7 xx0144616 $u Úrazová nemocnice, Brno; Klinika traumatologie LF MU, Brno
- 773 0_
- $t Úrazová chirurgie $x 1211-7080 $g Roč. 27, č. 1 (2020), s. 215-219 $w MED00011238
- 856 41
- $y plný text volně přístupný $u https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/urazova-chirurgie/2020-1-25/hrebova-osteosynteza-zlomenin-proximalniho-humeru-122596?hl=en
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1869 $c 471 a $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200607131856 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201202130542 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1542576 $s 1100466
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 27 $c 1 $d 215-219 $i 1211-7080 $m Úrazová chirurgie $x MED00011238
- LZP __
- $c NLK193 $d 20201202 $a NLK 2020-24/dk