Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Unfavourable birth outcomes of the Roma women in the Czech Republic and the potential explanations: a population-based study

M. Bobak, J. Dejmek, I. Solansky, RJ. Sram,

. 2005 ; 5 (-) : 106. [pub] 20051010

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Data on the health status of the Roma people in Central and Eastern Europe are sparse and the reasons for their poor health are not clear. The objective of this study was to quantify the differences in birth outcomes between Roma and non-Roma mothers in the Czech Republic and to investigate the potential causes of such differences. METHOD: A population-based study recruited 8938 non-Roma and 1388 Roma hospitalised singleton births that occurred in two Czech districts (Teplice and Prachatice) between 1995 and 2004. During their stay in hospital, mothers completed a questionnaire on their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and maternal smoking and alcohol consumption. Data on maternal height and weight and on infants' birth weight and gestational age were taken from hospital records. RESULTS: Birth weight and gestational age of Roma infants was 373 (SE 15) g and 0.92 (0.05) weeks, respectively, lower than in non-Roma infants. Controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and behavioural factors reduced these differences to 133 (18) g and 0.57 (0.06) weeks, respectively (all p-values < 0.001). In terms of binary outcomes, the Roma vs. non-Roma odds ratios were 4.5 (95% CI 3.7-5.4) for low birth weight (< 2500 g), 2.8 (2.2-3.4) for preterm birth (< 37 weeks of gestation), and 2.9 (2.5-3.4) for intrauterine grown retardation (<10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age); controlling for all covariates reduced these odds ratios to 1.7 (1.3-2.2), 1.5 (1.1-2.0) and 1.3 (1.0-1.6), respectively. Maternal education made the largest contribution to the ethnic differences; the role of health behaviours was relatively modest. CONCLUSION: There are striking differences in birth outcomes between Roma and non-Roma mothers. The causes of these differences are complex but largely socioeconomic.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20013808
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200915104331.0
007      
ta
008      
200911s2005 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/1471-2458-5-106 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)16216117
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Bobak, Martin $u International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. m.bobak@ucl.ac.uk
245    10
$a Unfavourable birth outcomes of the Roma women in the Czech Republic and the potential explanations: a population-based study / $c M. Bobak, J. Dejmek, I. Solansky, RJ. Sram,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Data on the health status of the Roma people in Central and Eastern Europe are sparse and the reasons for their poor health are not clear. The objective of this study was to quantify the differences in birth outcomes between Roma and non-Roma mothers in the Czech Republic and to investigate the potential causes of such differences. METHOD: A population-based study recruited 8938 non-Roma and 1388 Roma hospitalised singleton births that occurred in two Czech districts (Teplice and Prachatice) between 1995 and 2004. During their stay in hospital, mothers completed a questionnaire on their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and maternal smoking and alcohol consumption. Data on maternal height and weight and on infants' birth weight and gestational age were taken from hospital records. RESULTS: Birth weight and gestational age of Roma infants was 373 (SE 15) g and 0.92 (0.05) weeks, respectively, lower than in non-Roma infants. Controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and behavioural factors reduced these differences to 133 (18) g and 0.57 (0.06) weeks, respectively (all p-values < 0.001). In terms of binary outcomes, the Roma vs. non-Roma odds ratios were 4.5 (95% CI 3.7-5.4) for low birth weight (< 2500 g), 2.8 (2.2-3.4) for preterm birth (< 37 weeks of gestation), and 2.9 (2.5-3.4) for intrauterine grown retardation (<10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age); controlling for all covariates reduced these odds ratios to 1.7 (1.3-2.2), 1.5 (1.1-2.0) and 1.3 (1.0-1.6), respectively. Maternal education made the largest contribution to the ethnic differences; the role of health behaviours was relatively modest. CONCLUSION: There are striking differences in birth outcomes between Roma and non-Roma mothers. The causes of these differences are complex but largely socioeconomic.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a porodní hmotnost $7 D001724
650    _2
$a stupeň vzdělání $7 D004522
650    _2
$a běloši $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D044465
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gestační stáří $7 D005865
650    _2
$a hospitalizace $7 D006760
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a věk matky $7 D008423
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    _2
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a výsledek těhotenství $x etnologie $7 D011256
650    _2
$a regresní analýza $7 D012044
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a Romové $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D006178
650    _2
$a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dejmek, Jan
700    1_
$a Solansky, Ivo
700    1_
$a Sram, Radim J
773    0_
$w MED00008205 $t BMC public health $x 1471-2458 $g Roč. 5, č. - (2005), s. 106
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16216117 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200911 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200915104327 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1563254 $s 1103965
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2005 $b 5 $c - $d 106 $e 20051010 $i 1471-2458 $m BMC public health $n BMC Public Health $x MED00008205
GRA    __
$p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200911

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...