Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Great Tit (Parus major) Uropygial Gland Microbiomes and Their Potential Defensive Roles

KH. Bodawatta, SK. Schierbech, NR. Petersen, K. Sam, N. Bos, KA. Jønsson, M. Poulsen,

. 2020 ; 11 (-) : 1735. [pub] 20200728

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

The uropygial gland (preen gland) of birds plays an important role in maintaining feather integrity and hygiene. Although a few studies have demonstrated potential defensive roles of bacteria residing within these glands, the diversity and functions of the uropygial gland microbiota are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the microbiota of great tit (Parus major) uropygial glands through both isolation of bacteria (culture-dependent) and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (culture-independent). Co-culture experiments of selected bacterial isolates with four known feather-degrading bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis, Kocuria rhizophila, Pseudomonas monteilii, and Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis), two non-feather degrading feather bacteria, one common soil bacterial pathogen and two common fungal pathogens enabled us to evaluate the potential antimicrobial properties of these isolates. Our results show major differences between bacterial communities characterized using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. In the former, we were only able to isolate 12 bacterial genera (dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria), while amplicon sequencing identified 110 bacterial genera (dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria). Uropygial gland bacterial isolates belonging to the genera Bacillus and Kocuria were able to suppress the growth of four of the nine tested antagonists, attesting to potential defensive roles. However, these bacterial genera were infrequent in our MiSeq results suggesting that the isolated bacteria may not be obligate gland symbionts. Furthermore, bacterial functional predictions using 16S rRNA sequences also revealed the ability of uropygial gland bacteria to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties, such as terpenes. Our findings support that uropygial gland bacteria may play a role in feather health and that bacterial symbionts might act as defensive microbes. Future investigations of these bacterial communities, with targeted approaches (e.g., bacterial isolation and chemical analyses), are thus warranted to improve our understanding of the evolution and function of these host-microbe interactions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20021922
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210309110220.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01735 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32849371
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Bodawatta, Kasun H $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
245    10
$a Great Tit (Parus major) Uropygial Gland Microbiomes and Their Potential Defensive Roles / $c KH. Bodawatta, SK. Schierbech, NR. Petersen, K. Sam, N. Bos, KA. Jønsson, M. Poulsen,
520    9_
$a The uropygial gland (preen gland) of birds plays an important role in maintaining feather integrity and hygiene. Although a few studies have demonstrated potential defensive roles of bacteria residing within these glands, the diversity and functions of the uropygial gland microbiota are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the microbiota of great tit (Parus major) uropygial glands through both isolation of bacteria (culture-dependent) and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (culture-independent). Co-culture experiments of selected bacterial isolates with four known feather-degrading bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis, Kocuria rhizophila, Pseudomonas monteilii, and Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis), two non-feather degrading feather bacteria, one common soil bacterial pathogen and two common fungal pathogens enabled us to evaluate the potential antimicrobial properties of these isolates. Our results show major differences between bacterial communities characterized using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. In the former, we were only able to isolate 12 bacterial genera (dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria), while amplicon sequencing identified 110 bacterial genera (dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria). Uropygial gland bacterial isolates belonging to the genera Bacillus and Kocuria were able to suppress the growth of four of the nine tested antagonists, attesting to potential defensive roles. However, these bacterial genera were infrequent in our MiSeq results suggesting that the isolated bacteria may not be obligate gland symbionts. Furthermore, bacterial functional predictions using 16S rRNA sequences also revealed the ability of uropygial gland bacteria to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties, such as terpenes. Our findings support that uropygial gland bacteria may play a role in feather health and that bacterial symbionts might act as defensive microbes. Future investigations of these bacterial communities, with targeted approaches (e.g., bacterial isolation and chemical analyses), are thus warranted to improve our understanding of the evolution and function of these host-microbe interactions.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Schierbech, Signe K $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Petersen, Nanna R $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Sam, Katerina $u Biology Centre of Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czechia. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Bos, Nick $u Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Jønsson, Knud A $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Poulsen, Michael $u Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
773    0_
$w MED00181714 $t Frontiers in microbiology $x 1664-302X $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 1735
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32849371 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210309110215 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1591630 $s 1112594
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 1735 $e 20200728 $i 1664-302X $m Frontiers in microbiology $n Front Microbiol $x MED00181714
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...