-
Something wrong with this record ?
Great Tit (Parus major) Uropygial Gland Microbiomes and Their Potential Defensive Roles
KH. Bodawatta, SK. Schierbech, NR. Petersen, K. Sam, N. Bos, KA. Jønsson, M. Poulsen,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The uropygial gland (preen gland) of birds plays an important role in maintaining feather integrity and hygiene. Although a few studies have demonstrated potential defensive roles of bacteria residing within these glands, the diversity and functions of the uropygial gland microbiota are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the microbiota of great tit (Parus major) uropygial glands through both isolation of bacteria (culture-dependent) and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (culture-independent). Co-culture experiments of selected bacterial isolates with four known feather-degrading bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis, Kocuria rhizophila, Pseudomonas monteilii, and Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis), two non-feather degrading feather bacteria, one common soil bacterial pathogen and two common fungal pathogens enabled us to evaluate the potential antimicrobial properties of these isolates. Our results show major differences between bacterial communities characterized using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. In the former, we were only able to isolate 12 bacterial genera (dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria), while amplicon sequencing identified 110 bacterial genera (dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria). Uropygial gland bacterial isolates belonging to the genera Bacillus and Kocuria were able to suppress the growth of four of the nine tested antagonists, attesting to potential defensive roles. However, these bacterial genera were infrequent in our MiSeq results suggesting that the isolated bacteria may not be obligate gland symbionts. Furthermore, bacterial functional predictions using 16S rRNA sequences also revealed the ability of uropygial gland bacteria to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties, such as terpenes. Our findings support that uropygial gland bacteria may play a role in feather health and that bacterial symbionts might act as defensive microbes. Future investigations of these bacterial communities, with targeted approaches (e.g., bacterial isolation and chemical analyses), are thus warranted to improve our understanding of the evolution and function of these host-microbe interactions.
Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Section for Ecology and Evolution Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20021922
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210309110220.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01735 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32849371
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Bodawatta, Kasun H $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 245 10
- $a Great Tit (Parus major) Uropygial Gland Microbiomes and Their Potential Defensive Roles / $c KH. Bodawatta, SK. Schierbech, NR. Petersen, K. Sam, N. Bos, KA. Jønsson, M. Poulsen,
- 520 9_
- $a The uropygial gland (preen gland) of birds plays an important role in maintaining feather integrity and hygiene. Although a few studies have demonstrated potential defensive roles of bacteria residing within these glands, the diversity and functions of the uropygial gland microbiota are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the microbiota of great tit (Parus major) uropygial glands through both isolation of bacteria (culture-dependent) and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (culture-independent). Co-culture experiments of selected bacterial isolates with four known feather-degrading bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis, Kocuria rhizophila, Pseudomonas monteilii, and Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis), two non-feather degrading feather bacteria, one common soil bacterial pathogen and two common fungal pathogens enabled us to evaluate the potential antimicrobial properties of these isolates. Our results show major differences between bacterial communities characterized using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. In the former, we were only able to isolate 12 bacterial genera (dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria), while amplicon sequencing identified 110 bacterial genera (dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria). Uropygial gland bacterial isolates belonging to the genera Bacillus and Kocuria were able to suppress the growth of four of the nine tested antagonists, attesting to potential defensive roles. However, these bacterial genera were infrequent in our MiSeq results suggesting that the isolated bacteria may not be obligate gland symbionts. Furthermore, bacterial functional predictions using 16S rRNA sequences also revealed the ability of uropygial gland bacteria to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties, such as terpenes. Our findings support that uropygial gland bacteria may play a role in feather health and that bacterial symbionts might act as defensive microbes. Future investigations of these bacterial communities, with targeted approaches (e.g., bacterial isolation and chemical analyses), are thus warranted to improve our understanding of the evolution and function of these host-microbe interactions.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Schierbech, Signe K $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Petersen, Nanna R $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Sam, Katerina $u Biology Centre of Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czechia. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Bos, Nick $u Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Jønsson, Knud A $u Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Poulsen, Michael $u Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181714 $t Frontiers in microbiology $x 1664-302X $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 1735
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32849371 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210309110215 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1591630 $s 1112594
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 1735 $e 20200728 $i 1664-302X $m Frontiers in microbiology $n Front Microbiol $x MED00181714
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125