-
Something wrong with this record ?
In vitro comparison of efficacy of catheter locks in the treatment of catheter related blood stream infection
J. Visek, L. Ryskova, R. Safranek, M. Lasticova, V. Blaha,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Bacteremia prevention & control MeSH
- Candida drug effects MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Gentamicins pharmacology MeSH
- Catheter-Related Infections prevention & control MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus drug effects MeSH
- Parenteral Nutrition, Total instrumentation MeSH
- Colony Count, Microbial MeSH
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa drug effects MeSH
- Taurine analogs & derivatives drug effects MeSH
- Thiadiazines MeSH
- Vancomycin pharmacology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Venous access used for parenteral nutrition (PN) application is extremely important for patients with intestinal failure. Potential loss of venous access might be a catastrophy for the patient. Catheter infections are a serious complication of PN application. Systemic administration of antibiotics as well as local antibiotic locks into the catheter to sterilize the catheter are used to treat catheter infections. However, there is no clear recommendation applying use of antibiotic locks, that would specify the type and concentration of antimicrobial medication. Our objective were to compare the efficacy of different types of antimicrobial lock therapy (especially taurolidine) and their concentrations to eradicate infectious agents. METHODS: Bacterial strains of microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, Candida albicans) were used. Subsequently, the catheter was exposed to the microbes and then was incubated with a specific lock for 2 or 24 h at 37 °C. We used these locks: ethanol 70%, taurolidine, gentamicine in concentrations 0,5, 1 and 10 mg/ml and vancomycine in concentrations 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml. The number of remaining CFU (colony forming units) was compared after incubation. RESULTS: 70% ethanol and taurolidine were most effective for all studied microorganisms. Gentamicine was more effective than vancomycine. CONCLUSIONS: The most effective antimicrobial lock solutions to eradicate selected pathogenic agents were ethanol and taurolidine. Use of antibiotics is often effective after many hours of treatment and there is a risk of inadequate therapy.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20022800
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214124825.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.01.010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30904209
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Visek, Jakub $u 3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Metabolic Care and Gerontology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: visekjak@fnhk.cz.
- 245 10
- $a In vitro comparison of efficacy of catheter locks in the treatment of catheter related blood stream infection / $c J. Visek, L. Ryskova, R. Safranek, M. Lasticova, V. Blaha,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND & AIMS: Venous access used for parenteral nutrition (PN) application is extremely important for patients with intestinal failure. Potential loss of venous access might be a catastrophy for the patient. Catheter infections are a serious complication of PN application. Systemic administration of antibiotics as well as local antibiotic locks into the catheter to sterilize the catheter are used to treat catheter infections. However, there is no clear recommendation applying use of antibiotic locks, that would specify the type and concentration of antimicrobial medication. Our objective were to compare the efficacy of different types of antimicrobial lock therapy (especially taurolidine) and their concentrations to eradicate infectious agents. METHODS: Bacterial strains of microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, Candida albicans) were used. Subsequently, the catheter was exposed to the microbes and then was incubated with a specific lock for 2 or 24 h at 37 °C. We used these locks: ethanol 70%, taurolidine, gentamicine in concentrations 0,5, 1 and 10 mg/ml and vancomycine in concentrations 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml. The number of remaining CFU (colony forming units) was compared after incubation. RESULTS: 70% ethanol and taurolidine were most effective for all studied microorganisms. Gentamicine was more effective than vancomycine. CONCLUSIONS: The most effective antimicrobial lock solutions to eradicate selected pathogenic agents were ethanol and taurolidine. Use of antibiotics is often effective after many hours of treatment and there is a risk of inadequate therapy.
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriemie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D016470
- 650 _2
- $a Candida $x účinky léků $7 D002175
- 650 _2
- $a katétrové infekce $x prevence a kontrola $7 D055499
- 650 _2
- $a počet mikrobiálních kolonií $7 D015169
- 650 _2
- $a design vybavení $7 D004867
- 650 _2
- $a gentamiciny $x farmakologie $7 D005839
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a methicilin rezistentní Staphylococcus aureus $x účinky léků $7 D055624
- 650 _2
- $a parenterální výživa úplná $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D010289
- 650 _2
- $a Pseudomonas aeruginosa $x účinky léků $7 D011550
- 650 _2
- $a taurin $x analogy a deriváty $x účinky léků $7 D013654
- 650 _2
- $a thiadiaziny $7 D013829
- 650 _2
- $a vankomycin $x farmakologie $7 D014640
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ryskova, Lenka $u Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Faculty in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ryskoval@lfhk.cuni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Safranek, Roman $u Nephrology and Dialysis Department, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Faculty in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: roman.safranek@fnhk.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Lasticova, Martina $u 3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Metabolic Care and Gerontology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: martina.lasticova@fnhk.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Blaha, Vladimír $u 3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Metabolic Care and Gerontology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Electronic address: blaha@lfhk.cuni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00205669 $t Clinical nutrition ESPEN $x 2405-4577 $g Roč. 30, č. - (2019), s. 107-112
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30904209 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214124825 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595119 $s 1113476
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 30 $c - $d 107-112 $e 20190223 $i 2405-4577 $m Clinical nutrition ESPEN $n Clin Nutr ESPEN $x MED00205669
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125