• Something wrong with this record ?

Diagnostic Reliability, Accuracy and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Biopsy and Ascites Puncture in Primarily Inoperable Ovarian Tumours

P. Vlasak, J. Bouda, J. Kostun, D. Berezovskiy, M. Zikan, V. Weinberger, O. Ondic, Z. Rusavy, R. Kucera, O. Topolcan, Z. Novotny, J. Presl,

. 2020 ; 40 (6) : 3527-3534. [pub] -

Language English Country Greece

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the diagnostic reliability, accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided biopsy (Tru-Cut biopsy) and ascites puncture in patients with a primarily inoperable malignant ovarian tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the studied methods in consecutively examined patients and a prospective validation of these methods. 79 women with a suspected primarily inoperable ovarian tumor underwent Tru-Cut biopsies and were included in the ultrasound-guided biopsy group. In addition, 55 patients after ascites puncture were enrolled in the comparison group. Both procedures were performed in 48 patients for the prospective validation. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of ultrasound-guided biopsy were found in all studied variables (malignancy confirmation 72.9% vs. 95.8%, tumor origin 52.1% vs. 89.6%, histologic subtype 43.8% vs. 85.4% and accuracy, i.e. agreement of preoperative and definitive diagnosis 43.7% vs. 95.4%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate, reliable, safe and minimally invasive method. Owing to the high reliability and accuracy, it has the capacity to replace ascites puncture with cytologic examination or a more invasive method (laparoscopy, laparotomy) for adequate tumor sampling.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023006
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214125114.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 gr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21873/anticanres.14341 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32487654
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gr
100    1_
$a Vlasak, Pavel $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Diagnostic Reliability, Accuracy and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Biopsy and Ascites Puncture in Primarily Inoperable Ovarian Tumours / $c P. Vlasak, J. Bouda, J. Kostun, D. Berezovskiy, M. Zikan, V. Weinberger, O. Ondic, Z. Rusavy, R. Kucera, O. Topolcan, Z. Novotny, J. Presl,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the diagnostic reliability, accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided biopsy (Tru-Cut biopsy) and ascites puncture in patients with a primarily inoperable malignant ovarian tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the studied methods in consecutively examined patients and a prospective validation of these methods. 79 women with a suspected primarily inoperable ovarian tumor underwent Tru-Cut biopsies and were included in the ultrasound-guided biopsy group. In addition, 55 patients after ascites puncture were enrolled in the comparison group. Both procedures were performed in 48 patients for the prospective validation. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of ultrasound-guided biopsy were found in all studied variables (malignancy confirmation 72.9% vs. 95.8%, tumor origin 52.1% vs. 89.6%, histologic subtype 43.8% vs. 85.4% and accuracy, i.e. agreement of preoperative and definitive diagnosis 43.7% vs. 95.4%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate, reliable, safe and minimally invasive method. Owing to the high reliability and accuracy, it has the capacity to replace ascites puncture with cytologic examination or a more invasive method (laparoscopy, laparotomy) for adequate tumor sampling.
650    _2
$a ascites $x patologie $7 D001201
650    _2
$a cytodiagnostika $7 D003581
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a histocytochemie $7 D006651
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ultrazvukem navigovaná biopsie $x metody $x normy $7 D061705
650    _2
$a nádory vaječníků $x diagnóza $7 D010051
650    12
$a punkce $x metody $7 D011677
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bouda, Jiri $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kostun, Jan $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Berezovskiy, Denis $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zikan, Michal $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Na Bulovce, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Weinberger, Vit $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ondic, Ondrej $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rusavy, Zdenek $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kucera, Radek $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Topolcan, Ondrej $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Novotny, Zdenek $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Presl, Jiri $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic jiri.presl77@gmail.com.
773    0_
$w MED00000478 $t Anticancer research $x 1791-7530 $g Roč. 40, č. 6 (2020), s. 3527-3534
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32487654 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214125113 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595325 $s 1113682
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 40 $c 6 $d 3527-3534 $e - $i 1791-7530 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...