Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory

J. Gehrig, G. Michalareas, MT. Forster, J. Lei, P. Hok, H. Laufs, C. Senft, V. Seifert, JM. Schoffelen, S. Hanslmayr, CA. Kell,

. 2019 ; 39 (33) : 6498-6512. [pub] 20190613

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The way the human brain represents speech in memory is still unknown. An obvious characteristic of speech is its evolvement over time. During speech processing, neural oscillations are modulated by the temporal properties of the acoustic speech signal, but also acquired knowledge on the temporal structure of language influences speech perception-related brain activity. This suggests that speech could be represented in the temporal domain, a form of representation that the brain also uses to encode autobiographic memories. Empirical evidence for such a memory code is lacking. We investigated the nature of speech memory representations using direct cortical recordings in the left perisylvian cortex during delayed sentence reproduction in female and male patients undergoing awake tumor surgery. Our results reveal that the brain endogenously represents speech in the temporal domain. Temporal pattern similarity analyses revealed that the phase of frontotemporal low-frequency oscillations, primarily in the beta range, represents sentence identity in working memory. The positive relationship between beta power during working memory and task performance suggests that working memory representations benefit from increased phase separation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Memory is an endogenous source of information based on experience. While neural oscillations encode autobiographic memories in the temporal domain, little is known on their contribution to memory representations of human speech. Our electrocortical recordings in participants who maintain sentences in memory identify the phase of left frontotemporal beta oscillations as the most prominent information carrier of sentence identity. These observations provide evidence for a theoretical model on speech memory representations and explain why interfering with beta oscillations in the left inferior frontal cortex diminishes verbal working memory capacity. The lack of sentence identity coding at the syllabic rate suggests that sentences are represented in memory in a more abstract form compared with speech coding during speech perception and production.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023743
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214131028.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0018-19.2019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31196933
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Gehrig, Johannes $u Department of Neurology, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
245    10
$a Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory / $c J. Gehrig, G. Michalareas, MT. Forster, J. Lei, P. Hok, H. Laufs, C. Senft, V. Seifert, JM. Schoffelen, S. Hanslmayr, CA. Kell,
520    9_
$a The way the human brain represents speech in memory is still unknown. An obvious characteristic of speech is its evolvement over time. During speech processing, neural oscillations are modulated by the temporal properties of the acoustic speech signal, but also acquired knowledge on the temporal structure of language influences speech perception-related brain activity. This suggests that speech could be represented in the temporal domain, a form of representation that the brain also uses to encode autobiographic memories. Empirical evidence for such a memory code is lacking. We investigated the nature of speech memory representations using direct cortical recordings in the left perisylvian cortex during delayed sentence reproduction in female and male patients undergoing awake tumor surgery. Our results reveal that the brain endogenously represents speech in the temporal domain. Temporal pattern similarity analyses revealed that the phase of frontotemporal low-frequency oscillations, primarily in the beta range, represents sentence identity in working memory. The positive relationship between beta power during working memory and task performance suggests that working memory representations benefit from increased phase separation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Memory is an endogenous source of information based on experience. While neural oscillations encode autobiographic memories in the temporal domain, little is known on their contribution to memory representations of human speech. Our electrocortical recordings in participants who maintain sentences in memory identify the phase of left frontotemporal beta oscillations as the most prominent information carrier of sentence identity. These observations provide evidence for a theoretical model on speech memory representations and explain why interfering with beta oscillations in the left inferior frontal cortex diminishes verbal working memory capacity. The lack of sentence identity coding at the syllabic rate suggests that sentences are represented in memory in a more abstract form compared with speech coding during speech perception and production.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a mozek $x fyziologie $7 D001921
650    _2
$a elektrokortikografie $7 D000069280
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a krátkodobá paměť $x fyziologie $7 D008570
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a řeč $x fyziologie $7 D013060
650    _2
$a percepce řeči $x fyziologie $7 D013067
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Michalareas, Georgios $u Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Forster, Marie-Therese $u Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Lei, Juan $u Department of Neurology, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany. Institute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Hok, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany. Department of Neurology, Palacky University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77147 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Laufs, Helmut $u Department of Neurology, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany. Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
700    1_
$a Senft, Christian $u Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Seifert, Volker $u Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs $u Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and.
700    1_
$a Hanslmayr, Simon $u School of Psychology at University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Kell, Christian A $u Department of Neurology, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany, c.kell@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
773    0_
$w MED00002840 $t The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience $x 1529-2401 $g Roč. 39, č. 33 (2019), s. 6498-6512
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31196933 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214131026 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596062 $s 1114419
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 39 $c 33 $d 6498-6512 $e 20190613 $i 1529-2401 $m The Journal of neuroscience $n J Neurosci $x MED00002840
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...