Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Association between the cervicovaginal microbiome, BRCA1 mutation status, and risk of ovarian cancer: a case-control study

NR. Nené, D. Reisel, A. Leimbach, D. Franchi, A. Jones, I. Evans, S. Knapp, A. Ryan, S. Ghazali, JF. Timms, T. Paprotka, L. Bjørge, M. Zikan, D. Cibula, N. Colombo, M. Widschwendter,

. 2019 ; 20 (8) : 1171-1182. [pub] 20190709

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2000-09-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2000-09-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2000-09-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2000-09-01 to 2 months ago

BACKGROUND: Various factors-including age, family history, inflammation, reproductive factors, and tubal ligation-modulate the risk of ovarian cancer. In this study, our aim was to establish whether women with, or at risk of developing, ovarian cancer have an imbalanced cervicovaginal microbiome. METHODS: We did a case-control study in two sets of women aged 18-87 years in the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Norway, and the UK. The ovarian cancer set comprised women with epithelial ovarian cancer and controls (both healthy controls and those diagnosed with benign gynaecological conditions). The BRCA set comprised women with a BRCA1 mutation but without ovarian cancer and controls who were wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (both healthy controls and those with benign gynaecological conditions). Cervicovaginal samples were gathered from all participants with the ThinPrep system and then underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing. For each sample, we calculated the proportion of lactobacilli species (ie, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus jensenii), which are essential for the generation of a protective low vaginal pH, in the cervicovaginal microbiota. We grouped samples into those in which lactobacilli accounted for at least 50% of the species present (community type L) and those in which lactobacilli accounted for less than 50% of the species present (community type O). We assessed the adjusted association between BRCA1 status and ovarian cancer status and cervicovaginal microbiota community type, using a logistic regression model with a bias reduction method. FINDINGS: Participants were recruited between Jan 2, 2016, and July 21, 2018. The ovarian cancer set (n=360) comprised 176 women with epithelial ovarian cancer, 115 healthy controls and 69 controls with benign gynaecological conditions. The BRCA set (n=220) included 109 women with BRCA1 mutations, 97 healthy controls wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and 14 controls with a benign gynaecological condition wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2. On the basis of two-dimensional density plots, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and age thresholds used previously, we divided the cohort into those younger than 50 years and those aged 50 years or older. In the ovarian cancer set, women aged 50 years or older had a higher prevalence of community type O microbiota (81 [61%] of 133 ovarian cancer cases and 84 [59%] of 142 healthy controls) than those younger than 50 years (23 [53%] of 43 cases and 12 [29%] of 42 controls). In the ovarian cancer set, women younger than 50 years with ovarian cancer had a significantly higher prevalence of community type O microbiota than did age-matched controls under a logistic regression model with bias correction (odds ratio [OR] 2·80 [95% CI 1·17-6·94]; p=0·020). In the BRCA set, women with BRCA1 mutations younger than 50 years were also more likely to have community type O microbiota than age-matched controls (OR 2·79 [95% CI 1·25-6·68]; p=0·012), after adjustment for pregnancy (ever). This risk was increased further if more than one first-degree family member was affected by any cancer (OR 5·26 [95% CI 1·83-15·30]; p=0·0022). In both sets, we noted that the younger the participants, the stronger the association between community type O microbiota and ovarian cancer or BRCA1 mutation status (eg, OR for community type O for cases aged <40 years in the ovarian cancer set 7·00 [95% CI 1·27-51·44], p=0·025; OR for community type O for BRCA1 mutation carriers aged <35 years in the BRCA set 4·40 [1·14-24·36], p=0·031). INTERPRETATION: The presence of ovarian cancer, or factors known to affect risk for the disease (ie, age and BRCA1 germline mutations), were significantly associated with having a community type O cervicovaginal microbiota. Whether re-instatement of a community type L microbiome by using, for example, vaginal suppositories containing live lactobacilli, would alter the microbiomial composition higher up in the female genital tract and in the fallopian tubes (the site of origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer), and whether such changes could translate into a reduced incidence of ovarian cancer, needs to be investigated. FUNDING: EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, EU Horizon 2020 European Research Council Programme, and The Eve Appeal.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023788
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214131207.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30340-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31300207
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Nené, Nuno R $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
245    10
$a Association between the cervicovaginal microbiome, BRCA1 mutation status, and risk of ovarian cancer: a case-control study / $c NR. Nené, D. Reisel, A. Leimbach, D. Franchi, A. Jones, I. Evans, S. Knapp, A. Ryan, S. Ghazali, JF. Timms, T. Paprotka, L. Bjørge, M. Zikan, D. Cibula, N. Colombo, M. Widschwendter,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Various factors-including age, family history, inflammation, reproductive factors, and tubal ligation-modulate the risk of ovarian cancer. In this study, our aim was to establish whether women with, or at risk of developing, ovarian cancer have an imbalanced cervicovaginal microbiome. METHODS: We did a case-control study in two sets of women aged 18-87 years in the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Norway, and the UK. The ovarian cancer set comprised women with epithelial ovarian cancer and controls (both healthy controls and those diagnosed with benign gynaecological conditions). The BRCA set comprised women with a BRCA1 mutation but without ovarian cancer and controls who were wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (both healthy controls and those with benign gynaecological conditions). Cervicovaginal samples were gathered from all participants with the ThinPrep system and then underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing. For each sample, we calculated the proportion of lactobacilli species (ie, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus jensenii), which are essential for the generation of a protective low vaginal pH, in the cervicovaginal microbiota. We grouped samples into those in which lactobacilli accounted for at least 50% of the species present (community type L) and those in which lactobacilli accounted for less than 50% of the species present (community type O). We assessed the adjusted association between BRCA1 status and ovarian cancer status and cervicovaginal microbiota community type, using a logistic regression model with a bias reduction method. FINDINGS: Participants were recruited between Jan 2, 2016, and July 21, 2018. The ovarian cancer set (n=360) comprised 176 women with epithelial ovarian cancer, 115 healthy controls and 69 controls with benign gynaecological conditions. The BRCA set (n=220) included 109 women with BRCA1 mutations, 97 healthy controls wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and 14 controls with a benign gynaecological condition wild type for BRCA1 and BRCA2. On the basis of two-dimensional density plots, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and age thresholds used previously, we divided the cohort into those younger than 50 years and those aged 50 years or older. In the ovarian cancer set, women aged 50 years or older had a higher prevalence of community type O microbiota (81 [61%] of 133 ovarian cancer cases and 84 [59%] of 142 healthy controls) than those younger than 50 years (23 [53%] of 43 cases and 12 [29%] of 42 controls). In the ovarian cancer set, women younger than 50 years with ovarian cancer had a significantly higher prevalence of community type O microbiota than did age-matched controls under a logistic regression model with bias correction (odds ratio [OR] 2·80 [95% CI 1·17-6·94]; p=0·020). In the BRCA set, women with BRCA1 mutations younger than 50 years were also more likely to have community type O microbiota than age-matched controls (OR 2·79 [95% CI 1·25-6·68]; p=0·012), after adjustment for pregnancy (ever). This risk was increased further if more than one first-degree family member was affected by any cancer (OR 5·26 [95% CI 1·83-15·30]; p=0·0022). In both sets, we noted that the younger the participants, the stronger the association between community type O microbiota and ovarian cancer or BRCA1 mutation status (eg, OR for community type O for cases aged <40 years in the ovarian cancer set 7·00 [95% CI 1·27-51·44], p=0·025; OR for community type O for BRCA1 mutation carriers aged <35 years in the BRCA set 4·40 [1·14-24·36], p=0·031). INTERPRETATION: The presence of ovarian cancer, or factors known to affect risk for the disease (ie, age and BRCA1 germline mutations), were significantly associated with having a community type O cervicovaginal microbiota. Whether re-instatement of a community type L microbiome by using, for example, vaginal suppositories containing live lactobacilli, would alter the microbiomial composition higher up in the female genital tract and in the fallopian tubes (the site of origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer), and whether such changes could translate into a reduced incidence of ovarian cancer, needs to be investigated. FUNDING: EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, EU Horizon 2020 European Research Council Programme, and The Eve Appeal.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a protein BRCA1 $x genetika $7 D019313
650    _2
$a epiteliální ovariální karcinom $x genetika $x mikrobiologie $7 D000077216
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a cervix uteri $x mikrobiologie $7 D002584
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a genetická predispozice k nemoci $7 D020022
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a nádory vaječníků $x genetika $x mikrobiologie $7 D010051
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a vagina $x mikrobiologie $7 D014621
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Reisel, Daniel $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Leimbach, Andreas $u Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing, Constance, Germany.
700    1_
$a Franchi, Dorella $u Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Jones, Allison $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Evans, Iona $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Knapp, Susanne $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Ryan, Andy $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Ghazali, Shohreh $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Timms, John F $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Paprotka, Tobias $u Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing, Constance, Germany.
700    1_
$a Bjørge, Line $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
700    1_
$a Zikan, Michal $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Gynaecologic Oncology Center, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Colombo, Nicoletta $u Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Widschwendter, Martin $u Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: m.widschwendter@ucl.ac.uk.
773    0_
$w MED00011558 $t The Lancet. Oncology $x 1474-5488 $g Roč. 20, č. 8 (2019), s. 1171-1182
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31300207 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214131205 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596107 $s 1114464
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 20 $c 8 $d 1171-1182 $e 20190709 $i 1474-5488 $m Lancet oncology $n Lancet Oncol. $x MED00011558
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...