-
Something wrong with this record ?
Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)
N. Engel, Z. Végvári, R. Rice, V. Kubelka, T. Székely,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Ecosystem MeSH
- Nesting Behavior physiology MeSH
- Population Density MeSH
- Ovum physiology MeSH
- Predatory Behavior physiology MeSH
- Resin Cements chemistry MeSH
- Birds physiology MeSH
- Reproduction physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Ground-nesting birds face many challenges to reproduce successfully, with nest predation being the main cause of reproductive failure. Visual predators such as corvids and egg-eating raptors, are among the most common causes of nest failure; thus, parental strategies that reduce the risk of visual nest predation should be favored by selection. To date, most research has focused on egg crypsis without considering adult crypsis, although in natural circumstances the eggs are covered by an incubating parent most of the time. Here we use a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) as model species to experimentally test whether decoy parents influence nest predation. Using artificial nests with a male decoy, a female decoy or no decoy, we found that the presence of a decoy increased nest predation (N = 107 nests, p < 0.001). However, no difference was found in predation rates between nests with a male versus female decoy (p > 0.05). Additionally, we found that nests in densely vegetated habitats experienced higher survival compared to nests placed in sparsely vegetated habitats. Nest camera images, predator tracks and marks left on eggs identified the brown-necked raven (Corvus ruficollis) as the main visual nest predator. Our study suggests that the presence of incubating parents may enhance nest detectability to visual predators. However, parents may reduce the predation risk by placing a nest in sites where they are covered by vegetation. Our findings highlight the importance of nest site selection not only regarding egg crypsis but also considering incubating adult camouflage.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20024869
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222154929.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0236489 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32726365
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Engel, Noémie $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
- 245 10
- $a Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) / $c N. Engel, Z. Végvári, R. Rice, V. Kubelka, T. Székely,
- 520 9_
- $a Ground-nesting birds face many challenges to reproduce successfully, with nest predation being the main cause of reproductive failure. Visual predators such as corvids and egg-eating raptors, are among the most common causes of nest failure; thus, parental strategies that reduce the risk of visual nest predation should be favored by selection. To date, most research has focused on egg crypsis without considering adult crypsis, although in natural circumstances the eggs are covered by an incubating parent most of the time. Here we use a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) as model species to experimentally test whether decoy parents influence nest predation. Using artificial nests with a male decoy, a female decoy or no decoy, we found that the presence of a decoy increased nest predation (N = 107 nests, p < 0.001). However, no difference was found in predation rates between nests with a male versus female decoy (p > 0.05). Additionally, we found that nests in densely vegetated habitats experienced higher survival compared to nests placed in sparsely vegetated habitats. Nest camera images, predator tracks and marks left on eggs identified the brown-necked raven (Corvus ruficollis) as the main visual nest predator. Our study suggests that the presence of incubating parents may enhance nest detectability to visual predators. However, parents may reduce the predation risk by placing a nest in sites where they are covered by vegetation. Our findings highlight the importance of nest site selection not only regarding egg crypsis but also considering incubating adult camouflage.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ptáci $x fyziologie $7 D001717
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a hnízdění $x fyziologie $7 D009425
- 650 _2
- $a ovum $x fyziologie $7 D010063
- 650 _2
- $a hustota populace $7 D011156
- 650 _2
- $a predátorské chování $x fyziologie $7 D011235
- 650 _2
- $a rozmnožování $x fyziologie $7 D012098
- 650 _2
- $a pryskyřičné cementy $x chemie $7 D019279
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Végvári, Zsolt $u Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary. Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, Müncheberg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Rice, Romy $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Kubelka, Vojtěch $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. Department of Biodiversity Research, Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Székely, Tamás $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. Maio Biodiversity Foundation, Maio, Republic of Cape Verde.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 7 (2020), s. e0236489
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726365 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222154925 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599014 $s 1115555
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 15 $c 7 $d e0236489 $e 20200729 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125