• Something wrong with this record ?

Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)

N. Engel, Z. Végvári, R. Rice, V. Kubelka, T. Székely,

. 2020 ; 15 (7) : e0236489. [pub] 20200729

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Ground-nesting birds face many challenges to reproduce successfully, with nest predation being the main cause of reproductive failure. Visual predators such as corvids and egg-eating raptors, are among the most common causes of nest failure; thus, parental strategies that reduce the risk of visual nest predation should be favored by selection. To date, most research has focused on egg crypsis without considering adult crypsis, although in natural circumstances the eggs are covered by an incubating parent most of the time. Here we use a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) as model species to experimentally test whether decoy parents influence nest predation. Using artificial nests with a male decoy, a female decoy or no decoy, we found that the presence of a decoy increased nest predation (N = 107 nests, p < 0.001). However, no difference was found in predation rates between nests with a male versus female decoy (p > 0.05). Additionally, we found that nests in densely vegetated habitats experienced higher survival compared to nests placed in sparsely vegetated habitats. Nest camera images, predator tracks and marks left on eggs identified the brown-necked raven (Corvus ruficollis) as the main visual nest predator. Our study suggests that the presence of incubating parents may enhance nest detectability to visual predators. However, parents may reduce the predation risk by placing a nest in sites where they are covered by vegetation. Our findings highlight the importance of nest site selection not only regarding egg crypsis but also considering incubating adult camouflage.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20024869
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222154929.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0236489 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32726365
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Engel, Noémie $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
245    10
$a Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) / $c N. Engel, Z. Végvári, R. Rice, V. Kubelka, T. Székely,
520    9_
$a Ground-nesting birds face many challenges to reproduce successfully, with nest predation being the main cause of reproductive failure. Visual predators such as corvids and egg-eating raptors, are among the most common causes of nest failure; thus, parental strategies that reduce the risk of visual nest predation should be favored by selection. To date, most research has focused on egg crypsis without considering adult crypsis, although in natural circumstances the eggs are covered by an incubating parent most of the time. Here we use a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) as model species to experimentally test whether decoy parents influence nest predation. Using artificial nests with a male decoy, a female decoy or no decoy, we found that the presence of a decoy increased nest predation (N = 107 nests, p < 0.001). However, no difference was found in predation rates between nests with a male versus female decoy (p > 0.05). Additionally, we found that nests in densely vegetated habitats experienced higher survival compared to nests placed in sparsely vegetated habitats. Nest camera images, predator tracks and marks left on eggs identified the brown-necked raven (Corvus ruficollis) as the main visual nest predator. Our study suggests that the presence of incubating parents may enhance nest detectability to visual predators. However, parents may reduce the predation risk by placing a nest in sites where they are covered by vegetation. Our findings highlight the importance of nest site selection not only regarding egg crypsis but also considering incubating adult camouflage.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a ptáci $x fyziologie $7 D001717
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hnízdění $x fyziologie $7 D009425
650    _2
$a ovum $x fyziologie $7 D010063
650    _2
$a hustota populace $7 D011156
650    _2
$a predátorské chování $x fyziologie $7 D011235
650    _2
$a rozmnožování $x fyziologie $7 D012098
650    _2
$a pryskyřičné cementy $x chemie $7 D019279
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Végvári, Zsolt $u Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary. Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, Müncheberg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rice, Romy $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Kubelka, Vojtěch $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. Department of Biodiversity Research, Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Székely, Tamás $u Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. Maio Biodiversity Foundation, Maio, Republic of Cape Verde.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 7 (2020), s. e0236489
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726365 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222154925 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599014 $s 1115555
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 15 $c 7 $d e0236489 $e 20200729 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...