-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Which Factors Are Associated with Local Control and Survival of Patients with Localized Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma? A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Euro-EWING99 Trial
D. Andreou, A. Ranft, G. Gosheger, B. Timmermann, R. Ladenstein, W. Hartmann, S. Bauer, D. Baumhoer, H. van den Berg, PDS. Dijkstra, HR. Dürr, H. Gelderblom, J. Hardes, L. Hjorth, J. Kreyer, J. Kruseova, A. Leithner, S. Scobioala, A....
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2008 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed Central
od 2008 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 2008 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
- adjuvantní radioterapie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Ewingův sarkom diagnostické zobrazování mortalita patologie terapie MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- nádory kostí diagnostické zobrazování mortalita patologie terapie MeSH
- nádory pánve diagnostické zobrazování mortalita patologie terapie MeSH
- neoadjuvantní terapie MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- osteotomie * škodlivé účinky mortalita MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Local treatment of pelvic Ewing's sarcoma may be challenging, and intergroup studies have focused on improving systemic treatments rather than prospectively evaluating aspects of local tumor control. The Euro-EWING99 trial provided a substantial number of patients with localized pelvic tumors treated with the same chemotherapy protocol. Because local control included surgical resection, radiation therapy, or a combination of both, we wanted to investigate local control and survival with respect to the local modality in this study cohort. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with localized sacral tumors have a lower risk of local recurrence and higher survival compared with patients with localized tumors of the innominate bones? (2) Is the local treatment modality associated with local control and survival in patients with sacral and nonsacral tumors? (3) Which local tumor- and treatment-related factors, such as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, institution where the biopsy was performed, and surgical complications, are associated with local recurrence and patient survival in nonsacral tumors? (4) Which factors, such as persistent extraosseous tumor growth after chemotherapy or extent of bony resection, are independently associated with overall survival in patients with bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment? METHODS: Between 1998 and 2009, 1411 patients with previously untreated, histologically confirmed Ewing's sarcoma were registered in the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Ewing's sarcoma database and treated in the Euro-EWING99 trial. In all, 24% (339 of 1411) of these patients presented with a pelvic primary sarcoma, 47% (159 of 339) of which had macroscopic metastases at diagnosis and were excluded from this analysis. The data from the remaining 180 patients were reviewed retrospectively, based on follow-up data as of July 2016. The median (range) follow-up was 54 months (5 to 191) for all patients and 84 months (11 to 191) for surviving patients. The study endpoints were overall survival, local recurrence and event-free survival probability, which were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their respective 95% CIs were estimated in a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: Sacral tumors were associated with a reduced probability of local recurrence (12% [95% CI 1 to 22] versus 28% [95% CI 20 to 36] at 5 years, p = 0.032), a higher event-free survival probability (66% [95% CI 51 to 81] versus 50% [95% CI 41 to 58] at 5 years, p = 0.026) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 57 to 87] versus 56% [95% CI 47 to 64] at 5 years, p = 0.025) compared with nonsacral tumors. With the numbers available, we found no differences between patients with sacral tumors who underwent definitive radiotherapy and those who underwent combined surgery and radiotherapy in terms of local recurrence (17% [95% CI 0 to 34] versus 0% [95% CI 0 to 20] at 5 years, p = 0.125) and overall survival probability (73% [95% CI 52 to 94] versus 78% [95% CI 56 to 99] at 5 years, p = 0.764). In nonsacral tumors, combined local treatment was associated with a lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 5 to 23] versus 33% [95% CI 19 to 47] at 5 years, p = 0.015) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 61 to 83] versus 47% [95% CI 33 to 62] at 5 years, p = 0.024) compared with surgery alone. Even in a subgroup of patients with wide surgical margins and a good histologic response to induction treatment, the combined local treatment was associated with a higher overall survival probability (87% [95% CI 74 to 100] versus 51% [95% CI 33 to 69] at 5 years, p = 0.009), compared with surgery alone.A poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy in nonsacral tumors (39% [95% CI 19 to 59] versus 64% [95% CI 52 to 76] at 5 years, p = 0.014) and the development of surgical complications after tumor resection (35% [95% CI 11 to 59] versus 68% [95% CI 58 to 78] at 5 years, p = 0.004) were associated with a lower overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors, while a tumor biopsy performed at the same institution where the tumor resection was performed was associated with lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 4 to 24] versus 32% [95% CI 16 to 48] at 5 years, p = 0.035), respectively.In patients with bone tumors who underwent surgical treatment, we found that after controlling for tumor localization in the pelvis, tumor volume, and surgical margin status, patients who did not undergo complete (defined as a Type I/II resection for iliac bone tumors, a Type II/III resection for pubic bone and ischium tumors and a Type I/II/III resection for tumors involving the acetabulum, according to the Enneking classification) removal of the affected bone (HR 5.04 [95% CI 2.07 to 12.24]; p < 0.001), patients with a poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy (HR 3.72 [95% CI 1.51 to 9.21]; p = 0.004), and patients who did not receive additional radiotherapy (HR 4.34 [95% CI 1.71 to 11.05]; p = 0.002) had a higher risk of death. The analysis suggested that the same might be the case in patients with a persistent extraosseous tumor extension after induction chemotherapy (HR 4.61 [95% CI 1.03 to 20.67]; p = 0.046), although the wide CIs pointing at a possible sparse-data bias precluded any definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: Patients with sacral Ewing's sarcoma appear to have a lower probability for local recurrence and a higher overall survival probability compared with patients with tumors of the innominate bones. Our results seem to support a recent recommendation of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group to locally treat most sacral Ewing's sarcomas with definitive radiotherapy. Combined surgical resection and radiotherapy appear to be associated with a higher overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors compared with surgery alone, even in patients with a wide resection and a good histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complete removal of the involved bone, as defined above, in patients with nonsacral tumors may be associated with a decreased likelihood of local recurrence and improved overall survival. Persistent extraosseous tumor growth after induction treatment in patients with nonsacral bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment might be an important indicator of poorer overall survival probability, but the possibility of sparse-data bias in our cohort means that this factor should first be validated in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025217
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155121.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000962 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31580267
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Andreou, Dimosthenis $u D. Andreou, G. Gosheger, Department of General Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, University Hospital Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany A. Ranft, U. Dirksen, Pediatrics III, Hematology/Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany B. Timmermann, Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany R. Ladenstein, Department of Studies and Statistics on Integrated Research and Projects (S2IRP), Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria W. Hartmann, E. Wardelmann, Gerhard-Domagk-Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany S. Bauer, Department of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany D. Baumhoer, Bone Tumor Reference Center, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland H. van den Berg, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands P. D. S. Dijkstra, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands H. R. Dürr, Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany H. Gelderblom, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands J. Hardes, A Streitbürger, Department of Tumor Orthopedics and Sarcoma Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany L. Hjorth, Department of Paediatrics, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden J. Kreyer, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany J. Kruseova, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic A. Leithner, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria S. Scobioala, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany P-U. Tunn, Department of Orthopedic Oncology, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany R. Windhager, Department of Orthopedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria H. Jürgens, Department of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Which Factors Are Associated with Local Control and Survival of Patients with Localized Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma? A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Euro-EWING99 Trial / $c D. Andreou, A. Ranft, G. Gosheger, B. Timmermann, R. Ladenstein, W. Hartmann, S. Bauer, D. Baumhoer, H. van den Berg, PDS. Dijkstra, HR. Dürr, H. Gelderblom, J. Hardes, L. Hjorth, J. Kreyer, J. Kruseova, A. Leithner, S. Scobioala, A. Streitbürger, PU. Tunn, E. Wardelmann, R. Windhager, H. Jürgens, U. Dirksen, GPOH-Euro-EWING99 consortium,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Local treatment of pelvic Ewing's sarcoma may be challenging, and intergroup studies have focused on improving systemic treatments rather than prospectively evaluating aspects of local tumor control. The Euro-EWING99 trial provided a substantial number of patients with localized pelvic tumors treated with the same chemotherapy protocol. Because local control included surgical resection, radiation therapy, or a combination of both, we wanted to investigate local control and survival with respect to the local modality in this study cohort. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with localized sacral tumors have a lower risk of local recurrence and higher survival compared with patients with localized tumors of the innominate bones? (2) Is the local treatment modality associated with local control and survival in patients with sacral and nonsacral tumors? (3) Which local tumor- and treatment-related factors, such as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, institution where the biopsy was performed, and surgical complications, are associated with local recurrence and patient survival in nonsacral tumors? (4) Which factors, such as persistent extraosseous tumor growth after chemotherapy or extent of bony resection, are independently associated with overall survival in patients with bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment? METHODS: Between 1998 and 2009, 1411 patients with previously untreated, histologically confirmed Ewing's sarcoma were registered in the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Ewing's sarcoma database and treated in the Euro-EWING99 trial. In all, 24% (339 of 1411) of these patients presented with a pelvic primary sarcoma, 47% (159 of 339) of which had macroscopic metastases at diagnosis and were excluded from this analysis. The data from the remaining 180 patients were reviewed retrospectively, based on follow-up data as of July 2016. The median (range) follow-up was 54 months (5 to 191) for all patients and 84 months (11 to 191) for surviving patients. The study endpoints were overall survival, local recurrence and event-free survival probability, which were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their respective 95% CIs were estimated in a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: Sacral tumors were associated with a reduced probability of local recurrence (12% [95% CI 1 to 22] versus 28% [95% CI 20 to 36] at 5 years, p = 0.032), a higher event-free survival probability (66% [95% CI 51 to 81] versus 50% [95% CI 41 to 58] at 5 years, p = 0.026) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 57 to 87] versus 56% [95% CI 47 to 64] at 5 years, p = 0.025) compared with nonsacral tumors. With the numbers available, we found no differences between patients with sacral tumors who underwent definitive radiotherapy and those who underwent combined surgery and radiotherapy in terms of local recurrence (17% [95% CI 0 to 34] versus 0% [95% CI 0 to 20] at 5 years, p = 0.125) and overall survival probability (73% [95% CI 52 to 94] versus 78% [95% CI 56 to 99] at 5 years, p = 0.764). In nonsacral tumors, combined local treatment was associated with a lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 5 to 23] versus 33% [95% CI 19 to 47] at 5 years, p = 0.015) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 61 to 83] versus 47% [95% CI 33 to 62] at 5 years, p = 0.024) compared with surgery alone. Even in a subgroup of patients with wide surgical margins and a good histologic response to induction treatment, the combined local treatment was associated with a higher overall survival probability (87% [95% CI 74 to 100] versus 51% [95% CI 33 to 69] at 5 years, p = 0.009), compared with surgery alone.A poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy in nonsacral tumors (39% [95% CI 19 to 59] versus 64% [95% CI 52 to 76] at 5 years, p = 0.014) and the development of surgical complications after tumor resection (35% [95% CI 11 to 59] versus 68% [95% CI 58 to 78] at 5 years, p = 0.004) were associated with a lower overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors, while a tumor biopsy performed at the same institution where the tumor resection was performed was associated with lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 4 to 24] versus 32% [95% CI 16 to 48] at 5 years, p = 0.035), respectively.In patients with bone tumors who underwent surgical treatment, we found that after controlling for tumor localization in the pelvis, tumor volume, and surgical margin status, patients who did not undergo complete (defined as a Type I/II resection for iliac bone tumors, a Type II/III resection for pubic bone and ischium tumors and a Type I/II/III resection for tumors involving the acetabulum, according to the Enneking classification) removal of the affected bone (HR 5.04 [95% CI 2.07 to 12.24]; p < 0.001), patients with a poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy (HR 3.72 [95% CI 1.51 to 9.21]; p = 0.004), and patients who did not receive additional radiotherapy (HR 4.34 [95% CI 1.71 to 11.05]; p = 0.002) had a higher risk of death. The analysis suggested that the same might be the case in patients with a persistent extraosseous tumor extension after induction chemotherapy (HR 4.61 [95% CI 1.03 to 20.67]; p = 0.046), although the wide CIs pointing at a possible sparse-data bias precluded any definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: Patients with sacral Ewing's sarcoma appear to have a lower probability for local recurrence and a higher overall survival probability compared with patients with tumors of the innominate bones. Our results seem to support a recent recommendation of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group to locally treat most sacral Ewing's sarcomas with definitive radiotherapy. Combined surgical resection and radiotherapy appear to be associated with a higher overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors compared with surgery alone, even in patients with a wide resection and a good histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complete removal of the involved bone, as defined above, in patients with nonsacral tumors may be associated with a decreased likelihood of local recurrence and improved overall survival. Persistent extraosseous tumor growth after induction treatment in patients with nonsacral bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment might be an important indicator of poorer overall survival probability, but the possibility of sparse-data bias in our cohort means that this factor should first be validated in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a nádory kostí $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patologie $x terapie $7 D001859
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní chemoterapie $7 D017024
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kojenec $7 D007223
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenec $7 D007231
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neoadjuvantní terapie $7 D020360
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
- 650 12
- $a osteotomie $x škodlivé účinky $x mortalita $7 D010027
- 650 _2
- $a nádory pánve $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patologie $x terapie $7 D010386
- 650 _2
- $a doba přežití bez progrese choroby $7 D000077982
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní radioterapie $7 D018714
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a Ewingův sarkom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x mortalita $x patologie $x terapie $7 D012512
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Ranft, Andreas
- 700 1_
- $a Gosheger, Georg
- 700 1_
- $a Timmermann, Beate
- 700 1_
- $a Ladenstein, Ruth
- 700 1_
- $a Hartmann, Wolfgang
- 700 1_
- $a Bauer, Sebastian
- 700 1_
- $a Baumhoer, Daniel
- 700 1_
- $a van den Berg, Henk
- 700 1_
- $a Dijkstra, P D Sander
- 700 1_
- $a Dürr, Hans Roland
- 700 1_
- $a Gelderblom, Hans
- 700 1_
- $a Hardes, Jendrik
- 700 1_
- $a Hjorth, Lars
- 700 1_
- $a Kreyer, Justus
- 700 1_
- $a Kruseova, Jarmila
- 700 1_
- $a Leithner, Andreas
- 700 1_
- $a Scobioala, Sergiu
- 700 1_
- $a Streitbürger, Arne
- 700 1_
- $a Tunn, Per-Ulf
- 700 1_
- $a Wardelmann, Eva
- 700 1_
- $a Windhager, Reinhard
- 700 1_
- $a Jürgens, Heribert
- 700 1_
- $a Dirksen, Uta
- 710 2_
- $a GPOH-Euro-EWING99 consortium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001151 $t Clinical orthopaedics and related research $x 1528-1132 $g Roč. 478, č. 2 (2020), s. 290-302
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31580267 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155117 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599362 $s 1115903
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 478 $c 2 $d 290-302 $e - $i 1528-1132 $m Clinical orthopaedics and related research $n Clin Orthop Relat Res $x MED00001151
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125