-
Something wrong with this record ?
Life at High Latitudes Does Not Require Circadian Behavioral Rhythmicity under Constant Darkness
E. Bertolini, FK. Schubert, D. Zanini, H. Sehadová, C. Helfrich-Förster, P. Menegazzi,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Cell Press Free Archives
from 1995-01-01 to 1 year ago
Free Medical Journals
from 1995 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Circadian Clocks genetics physiology MeSH
- Circadian Rhythm physiology MeSH
- Drosophila physiology MeSH
- Drosophilidae genetics physiology MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Photoperiod MeSH
- Adaptation, Physiological physiology MeSH
- Cryptochromes physiology MeSH
- Locomotion physiology MeSH
- Altitude MeSH
- Neurons physiology MeSH
- Motor Activity physiology MeSH
- Drosophila Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Darkness MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Nearly all organisms evolved endogenous self-sustained timekeeping mechanisms to track and anticipate cyclic changes in the environment. Circadian clocks, with a periodicity of about 24 h, allow animals to adapt to day-night cycles. Biological clocks are highly adaptive, but strong behavioral rhythms might be a disadvantage for adaptation to weakly rhythmic environments such as polar areas [1, 2]. Several high-latitude species, including Drosophila species, were found to be highly arrhythmic under constant conditions [3-6]. Furthermore, Drosophila species from subarctic regions can extend evening activity until dusk under long days. These traits depend on the clock network neurochemistry, and we previously proposed that high-latitude Drosophila species evolved specific clock adaptations to colonize polar regions [5, 7, 8]. We broadened our analysis to 3 species of the Chymomyza genus, which diverged circa 5 million years before the Drosophila radiation [9] and colonized both low and high latitudes [10, 11]. C. costata, pararufithorax, and procnemis, independently of their latitude of origin, possess the clock neuronal network of low-latitude Drosophila species, and their locomotor activity does not track dusk under long photoperiods. Nevertheless, the high-latitude C. costata becomes arrhythmic under constant darkness (DD), whereas the two low-latitude species remain rhythmic. Different mechanisms are behind the arrhythmicity in DD of C. costata and the high-latitude Drosophila ezoana, suggesting that the ability to maintain behavioral rhythms has been lost more than once during drosophilids' evolution and that it might indeed be an evolutionary adaptation for life at high latitudes.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025493
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222153927.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.032 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31679928
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Bertolini, Enrico $u Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Life at High Latitudes Does Not Require Circadian Behavioral Rhythmicity under Constant Darkness / $c E. Bertolini, FK. Schubert, D. Zanini, H. Sehadová, C. Helfrich-Förster, P. Menegazzi,
- 520 9_
- $a Nearly all organisms evolved endogenous self-sustained timekeeping mechanisms to track and anticipate cyclic changes in the environment. Circadian clocks, with a periodicity of about 24 h, allow animals to adapt to day-night cycles. Biological clocks are highly adaptive, but strong behavioral rhythms might be a disadvantage for adaptation to weakly rhythmic environments such as polar areas [1, 2]. Several high-latitude species, including Drosophila species, were found to be highly arrhythmic under constant conditions [3-6]. Furthermore, Drosophila species from subarctic regions can extend evening activity until dusk under long days. These traits depend on the clock network neurochemistry, and we previously proposed that high-latitude Drosophila species evolved specific clock adaptations to colonize polar regions [5, 7, 8]. We broadened our analysis to 3 species of the Chymomyza genus, which diverged circa 5 million years before the Drosophila radiation [9] and colonized both low and high latitudes [10, 11]. C. costata, pararufithorax, and procnemis, independently of their latitude of origin, possess the clock neuronal network of low-latitude Drosophila species, and their locomotor activity does not track dusk under long photoperiods. Nevertheless, the high-latitude C. costata becomes arrhythmic under constant darkness (DD), whereas the two low-latitude species remain rhythmic. Different mechanisms are behind the arrhythmicity in DD of C. costata and the high-latitude Drosophila ezoana, suggesting that the ability to maintain behavioral rhythms has been lost more than once during drosophilids' evolution and that it might indeed be an evolutionary adaptation for life at high latitudes.
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologická adaptace $x fyziologie $7 D000222
- 650 _2
- $a nadmořská výška $7 D000531
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a cirkadiánní hodiny $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D057906
- 650 _2
- $a cirkadiánní rytmus $x fyziologie $7 D002940
- 650 _2
- $a kryptochromy $x fyziologie $7 D056931
- 650 _2
- $a tma $7 D003624
- 650 _2
- $a Drosophila $x fyziologie $7 D004330
- 650 _2
- $a proteiny Drosophily $x metabolismus $7 D029721
- 650 _2
- $a Drosophilidae $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D018428
- 650 _2
- $a lokomoce $x fyziologie $7 D008124
- 650 _2
- $a pohybová aktivita $x fyziologie $7 D009043
- 650 _2
- $a neurony $x fyziologie $7 D009474
- 650 _2
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a fotoperioda $7 D017440
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Schubert, Frank K $u Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Zanini, Damiano $u Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Sehadová, Hana $u Faculty of Science, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology and University of South Bohemia, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Helfrich-Förster, Charlotte $u Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Menegazzi, Pamela $u Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany. Electronic address: pamela.menegazzi@uni-wuerzburg.de.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006482 $t Current biology : CB $x 1879-0445 $g Roč. 29, č. 22 (2019), s. 3928-3936.e3
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31679928 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222153923 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599638 $s 1116179
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 29 $c 22 $d 3928-3936.e3 $e 20191031 $i 1879-0445 $m Current biology $n Curr Biol $x MED00006482
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125