-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Extended Timed Up & Go test: Is walking forward and returning back to the chair equivalent gait?
S. Viteckova, V. Cejka, P. Dusek, R. Krupicka, P. Kutilek, Z. Szabo, E. Růžička,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NV16-28119A
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 2 měsíci
- MeSH
- analýza chůze metody MeSH
- časoprostorová analýza MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- chůze fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Parkinsonova nemoc patofyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The Timed Up & Go test (TUG) is functional test and is a part of routine clinical examinations. The instrumented Timed Up & Go test enables its segmentation to sub-tasks: sit-to-stand, walking forward, turning, walking back, stand-to-sit, and consequently the computation of task-specific parameters and sub-tasks separately. However, there are no data on whether walking forward parameters differ from the walking back parameters. This study tested the differences between walking forward and walking back in the TUG extended to 10 m for 17 spatio-temporal gait parameters. All parameters were obtained from a GAITRite® pressure sensitive walkway (CIR Systems, Inc.). The differences were assessed for healthy controls and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. None of investigated parameters exhibited a difference between both gait subtasks for healthy subjects group. Five parameters of interest, namely velocity, step length, stride length, stride velocity, and the proportion of the double support phase with respect to gait cycle duration, showed a statistically significant difference between gait for walking forward and walking back in PD patients. Therefore, we recommend a separate assessment for walking forward and walking back rather than averaging both gaits together.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025848
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155507.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30982536
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Viteckova, Slavka $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic. Electronic address: slavka.viteckova@fbmi.cvut.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Extended Timed Up & Go test: Is walking forward and returning back to the chair equivalent gait? / $c S. Viteckova, V. Cejka, P. Dusek, R. Krupicka, P. Kutilek, Z. Szabo, E. Růžička,
- 520 9_
- $a The Timed Up & Go test (TUG) is functional test and is a part of routine clinical examinations. The instrumented Timed Up & Go test enables its segmentation to sub-tasks: sit-to-stand, walking forward, turning, walking back, stand-to-sit, and consequently the computation of task-specific parameters and sub-tasks separately. However, there are no data on whether walking forward parameters differ from the walking back parameters. This study tested the differences between walking forward and walking back in the TUG extended to 10 m for 17 spatio-temporal gait parameters. All parameters were obtained from a GAITRite® pressure sensitive walkway (CIR Systems, Inc.). The differences were assessed for healthy controls and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. None of investigated parameters exhibited a difference between both gait subtasks for healthy subjects group. Five parameters of interest, namely velocity, step length, stride length, stride velocity, and the proportion of the double support phase with respect to gait cycle duration, showed a statistically significant difference between gait for walking forward and walking back in PD patients. Therefore, we recommend a separate assessment for walking forward and walking back rather than averaging both gaits together.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a analýza chůze $x metody $7 D000077107
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a Parkinsonova nemoc $x patofyziologie $7 D010300
- 650 _2
- $a časoprostorová analýza $7 D062211
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Cejka, Vaclav $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vaclav.cejka@fbmi.cvut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Dusek, Petr $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petr.dusek@vfn.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Krupicka, Radim $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic. Electronic address: krupicka@fbmi.cvut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Kutilek, Patrik $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kutilek@fbmi.cvut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Szabo, Zoltan $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic. Electronic address: szabo@fbmi.cvut.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Růžička, Evžen $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: eruzi@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002553 $t Journal of biomechanics $x 1873-2380 $g Roč. 89, č. - (2019), s. 110-114
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30982536 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155502 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599993 $s 1116534
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 89 $c - $d 110-114 $e 20190410 $i 1873-2380 $m Journal of biomechanics $n J Biomech $x MED00002553
- GRA __
- $a NV16-28119A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125