-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of Apnea Detection Using Oronasal Thermal Airflow Sensor, Nasal Pressure Transducer, Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography and Tracheal Sound Sensor
A. Sabil, M. Glos, A. Günther, C. Schöbel, C. Veauthier, I. Fietze, T. Penzel,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2007 to 6 months ago
PubMed Central
from 2007 to 1 year ago
PubMed
30736876
DOI
10.5664/jcsm.7634
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Transducers, Pressure * MeSH
- Nose MeSH
- Plethysmography * MeSH
- Pulmonary Ventilation * MeSH
- Polysomnography methods MeSH
- Respiratory Sounds * MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sleep Apnea Syndromes diagnosis MeSH
- Trachea MeSH
- Mouth MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of apnea detection using a tracheal sound (TS) sensor during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Polysomnographic recordings of 32 patients (25 male, mean age 66.7 ± 15.3 years, and mean body mass index 30.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were analyzed to compare the detection of apneas by four different methods of airflow signals: oronasal thermal airflow sensor (thermistor), nasal pressure transducer (NP), respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIPsum) and TS. The four used signals were scored randomly and independently from each other according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules. Results of apnea detection using NP, RIPsum and TS signals were compared to those obtained by thermistor as a reference signal. RESULTS: The number of apneas detected by the thermistor was 4,167. The number of apneas detected using the NP was 5,416 (+29.97%), using the RIPsum was 2,959 (-29.71%) and using the TS was 5,019 (+20.45%). The kappa statistics (95% confidence interval) were 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) for TS, 0.69 (0.67 to 0.70) for NP, and 0.57 (0.55 to 0.59) for RIPsum. The sensitivity/specificity (%) with respect to the thermistor were 99.23/69.27, 64.07/93.06 and 96.06/76.07 for the NP, RIPsum and TS respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With the sensor placed properly on the suprasternal notch, tracheal sounds could help detecting apneas that are underscored by the RIPsum and identify apneas that may be overscored by the NP sensor due to mouth breathing. In the absence of thermistor, TS sensors can be used for apnea detection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), Title: Using the tracheal sound probe of the polygraph CID102 to detect and differentiate obstructive, central, and mixed sleep apneas in patients with sleep disordered breathing, Identifier: DRKS00012795, URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012795.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025939
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155540.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5664/jcsm.7634 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30736876
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Sabil, AbdelKebir $u Research and Development at CIDELEC, Sainte Gemmes, France.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Apnea Detection Using Oronasal Thermal Airflow Sensor, Nasal Pressure Transducer, Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography and Tracheal Sound Sensor / $c A. Sabil, M. Glos, A. Günther, C. Schöbel, C. Veauthier, I. Fietze, T. Penzel,
- 520 9_
- $a STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of apnea detection using a tracheal sound (TS) sensor during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Polysomnographic recordings of 32 patients (25 male, mean age 66.7 ± 15.3 years, and mean body mass index 30.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were analyzed to compare the detection of apneas by four different methods of airflow signals: oronasal thermal airflow sensor (thermistor), nasal pressure transducer (NP), respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIPsum) and TS. The four used signals were scored randomly and independently from each other according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules. Results of apnea detection using NP, RIPsum and TS signals were compared to those obtained by thermistor as a reference signal. RESULTS: The number of apneas detected by the thermistor was 4,167. The number of apneas detected using the NP was 5,416 (+29.97%), using the RIPsum was 2,959 (-29.71%) and using the TS was 5,019 (+20.45%). The kappa statistics (95% confidence interval) were 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) for TS, 0.69 (0.67 to 0.70) for NP, and 0.57 (0.55 to 0.59) for RIPsum. The sensitivity/specificity (%) with respect to the thermistor were 99.23/69.27, 64.07/93.06 and 96.06/76.07 for the NP, RIPsum and TS respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With the sensor placed properly on the suprasternal notch, tracheal sounds could help detecting apneas that are underscored by the RIPsum and identify apneas that may be overscored by the NP sensor due to mouth breathing. In the absence of thermistor, TS sensors can be used for apnea detection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), Title: Using the tracheal sound probe of the polygraph CID102 to detect and differentiate obstructive, central, and mixed sleep apneas in patients with sleep disordered breathing, Identifier: DRKS00012795, URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012795.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a ústa $7 D009055
- 650 _2
- $a nos $7 D009666
- 650 12
- $a pletysmografie $7 D010991
- 650 _2
- $a polysomnografie $x metody $7 D017286
- 650 12
- $a plicní ventilace $7 D012123
- 650 12
- $a respirační zvuky $7 D012135
- 650 _2
- $a syndromy spánkové apnoe $x diagnóza $7 D012891
- 650 _2
- $a trachea $7 D014132
- 650 12
- $a měniče tlakové $7 D014160
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Glos, Martin $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Günther, Alexandra $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Schöbel, Christoph $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Veauthier, Christian $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Fietze, Ingo $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Penzel, Thomas $u Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188111 $t Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine $x 1550-9397 $g Roč. 15, č. 2 (2019), s. 285-292
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30736876 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155536 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1600084 $s 1116625
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 15 $c 2 $d 285-292 $e 20190215 $i 1550-9397 $m Journal of clinical sleep medicine $n J Clin Sleep Med $x MED00188111
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125