• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

An eQTL in the cystathionine beta synthase gene is linked to osteoporosis in laying hens

DJ. De Koning, N. Dominguez-Gasca, RH. Fleming, A. Gill, D. Kurian, A. Law, HA. McCormack, D. Morrice, E. Sanchez-Rodriguez, AB. Rodriguez-Navarro, R. Preisinger, M. Schmutz, V. Šmídová, F. Turner, PW. Wilson, R. Zhou, IC. Dunn,

. 2020 ; 52 (1) : 13. [pub] 20200224

Jazyk angličtina Země Francie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028481

Grantová podpora
BBS/E/D/20211550 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
BB/M028291/1 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
BBS/E/D/20211553 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
BBS/E/D/20211554 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
291815 Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
BBS/E/D/20320000 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
BBS/E/D/05191132 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom
2014-01840 Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
BB/J004316/1 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Skeletal damage is a challenge for laying hens because the physiological adaptations required for egg laying make them susceptible to osteoporosis. Previously, we showed that genetic factors explain 40% of the variation in end of lay bone quality and we detected a quantitative trait locus (QTL) of large effect on chicken chromosome 1. The aim of this study was to combine data from the commercial founder White Leghorn population and the F2 mapping population to fine-map this QTL and understand its function in terms of gene expression and physiology. RESULTS: Several single nucleotide polymorphisms on chromosome 1 between 104 and 110 Mb (galGal6) had highly significant associations with tibial breaking strength. The alternative genotypes of markers of large effect that flanked the region had tibial breaking strengths of 200.4 vs. 218.1 Newton (P < 0.002) and, in a subsequent founder generation, the higher breaking strength genotype was again associated with higher breaking strength. In a subsequent generation, cortical bone density and volume were increased in individuals with the better bone genotype but with significantly reduced medullary bone quality. The effects on cortical bone density were confirmed in a further generation and was accompanied by increased mineral maturity of the cortical bone as measured by infrared spectrometry and there was evidence of better collagen cross-linking in the cortical bone. Comparing the transcriptome of the tibia from individuals with good or poor bone quality genotypes indicated four differentially-expressed genes at the locus, one gene, cystathionine beta synthase (CBS), having a nine-fold higher expression in the genotype for low bone quality. The mechanism was cis-acting and although there was an amino-acid difference in the CBS protein between the genotypes, there was no difference in the activity of the enzyme. Plasma homocysteine concentration, the substrate of CBS, was higher in the poor bone quality genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Validated markers that predict bone strength have been defined for selective breeding and a gene was identified that may suggest alternative ways to improve bone health in addition to genetic selection. The identification of how genetic variants affect different aspects of bone turnover shows potential for translational medicine.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028481
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114154013.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 fr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12711-020-00532-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32093603
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a fr
100    1_
$a De Koning, Dirk-Jan $u Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden.
245    13
$a An eQTL in the cystathionine beta synthase gene is linked to osteoporosis in laying hens / $c DJ. De Koning, N. Dominguez-Gasca, RH. Fleming, A. Gill, D. Kurian, A. Law, HA. McCormack, D. Morrice, E. Sanchez-Rodriguez, AB. Rodriguez-Navarro, R. Preisinger, M. Schmutz, V. Šmídová, F. Turner, PW. Wilson, R. Zhou, IC. Dunn,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Skeletal damage is a challenge for laying hens because the physiological adaptations required for egg laying make them susceptible to osteoporosis. Previously, we showed that genetic factors explain 40% of the variation in end of lay bone quality and we detected a quantitative trait locus (QTL) of large effect on chicken chromosome 1. The aim of this study was to combine data from the commercial founder White Leghorn population and the F2 mapping population to fine-map this QTL and understand its function in terms of gene expression and physiology. RESULTS: Several single nucleotide polymorphisms on chromosome 1 between 104 and 110 Mb (galGal6) had highly significant associations with tibial breaking strength. The alternative genotypes of markers of large effect that flanked the region had tibial breaking strengths of 200.4 vs. 218.1 Newton (P < 0.002) and, in a subsequent founder generation, the higher breaking strength genotype was again associated with higher breaking strength. In a subsequent generation, cortical bone density and volume were increased in individuals with the better bone genotype but with significantly reduced medullary bone quality. The effects on cortical bone density were confirmed in a further generation and was accompanied by increased mineral maturity of the cortical bone as measured by infrared spectrometry and there was evidence of better collagen cross-linking in the cortical bone. Comparing the transcriptome of the tibia from individuals with good or poor bone quality genotypes indicated four differentially-expressed genes at the locus, one gene, cystathionine beta synthase (CBS), having a nine-fold higher expression in the genotype for low bone quality. The mechanism was cis-acting and although there was an amino-acid difference in the CBS protein between the genotypes, there was no difference in the activity of the enzyme. Plasma homocysteine concentration, the substrate of CBS, was higher in the poor bone quality genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Validated markers that predict bone strength have been defined for selective breeding and a gene was identified that may suggest alternative ways to improve bone health in addition to genetic selection. The identification of how genetic variants affect different aspects of bone turnover shows potential for translational medicine.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a kostní denzita $7 D015519
650    _2
$a kosti a kostní tkáň $x patofyziologie $7 D001842
650    _2
$a kur domácí $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D002645
650    _2
$a chromozomy $x genetika $7 D002875
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    _2
$a osteoporóza $x genetika $x patofyziologie $x veterinární $7 D010024
650    _2
$a kladení vajíček $7 D010058
650    _2
$a jednonukleotidový polymorfismus $7 D020641
650    _2
$a nemoci drůbeže $x genetika $x patofyziologie $7 D011201
650    12
$a lokus kvantitativního znaku $7 D040641
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dominguez-Gasca, Nazaret $u Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrologia, Universidad de Granada, 18002, Granada, Spain.
700    1_
$a Fleming, Robert H $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Gill, Andrew $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. School of Chemistry, The University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, England, UK.
700    1_
$a Kurian, Dominic $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Law, Andrew $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a McCormack, Heather A $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Morrice, David $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Sanchez-Rodriguez, Estefania $u Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrologia, Universidad de Granada, 18002, Granada, Spain.
700    1_
$a Rodriguez-Navarro, Alejandro B $u Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrologia, Universidad de Granada, 18002, Granada, Spain.
700    1_
$a Preisinger, Rudolf $u Lohmann Tierzucht, 7454, Cuxhaven, Germany.
700    1_
$a Schmutz, Matthias $u Lohmann Tierzucht, 7454, Cuxhaven, Germany.
700    1_
$a Šmídová, Veronica $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Turner, Frances $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Wilson, Peter W $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
700    1_
$a Zhou, Rongyan $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071001, Hebei, China.
700    1_
$a Dunn, Ian C $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. ian.dunn@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
773    0_
$w MED00005136 $t Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE $x 1297-9686 $g Roč. 52, č. 1 (2020), s. 13
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32093603 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114154010 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608816 $s 1119661
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 52 $c 1 $d 13 $e 20200224 $i 1297-9686 $m Genetics selection evolution $n Genet Sel Evol $x MED00005136
GRA    __
$a BBS/E/D/20211550 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a BB/M028291/1 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a BBS/E/D/20211553 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a BBS/E/D/20211554 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 291815 $p Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
GRA    __
$a BBS/E/D/20320000 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a BBS/E/D/05191132 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 2014-01840 $p Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
GRA    __
$a BB/J004316/1 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...