• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

NA. Henriksen, A. Montgomery, R. Kaufmann, F. Berrevoet, B. East, J. Fischer, W. Hope, D. Klassen, R. Lorenz, Y. Renard, MA. Garcia Urena, MP. Simons, European and Americas Hernia Societies (EHS and AHS),

. 2020 ; 107 (3) : 171-190. [pub] 20200109

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028539

BACKGROUND: Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are frequently performed surgical procedures with an expected low complication rate. Nevertheless, the optimal method of repair with best short- and long-term outcomes remains debatable. The aim was to develop guidelines for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. METHODS: The guideline group consisted of surgeons from Europe and North America including members from the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument were used. A systematic literature search was done on 1 May 2018, and updated on 1 February 2019. RESULTS: Literature reporting specifically on umbilical and epigastric hernias was limited in quantity and quality, resulting in a majority of the recommendations being graded as weak, based on low-quality evidence. The main recommendation was to use mesh for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias to reduce the recurrence rate. Most umbilical and epigastric hernias may be repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh. A laparoscopic approach may be considered if the hernia defect is large, or if the patient has an increased risk of wound morbidity. CONCLUSION: This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. It is recommended that symptomatic umbilical and epigastric hernias are repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028539
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114154204.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/bjs.11489 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31916607
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Henriksen, N A $u Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
245    10
$a Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society / $c NA. Henriksen, A. Montgomery, R. Kaufmann, F. Berrevoet, B. East, J. Fischer, W. Hope, D. Klassen, R. Lorenz, Y. Renard, MA. Garcia Urena, MP. Simons, European and Americas Hernia Societies (EHS and AHS),
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are frequently performed surgical procedures with an expected low complication rate. Nevertheless, the optimal method of repair with best short- and long-term outcomes remains debatable. The aim was to develop guidelines for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. METHODS: The guideline group consisted of surgeons from Europe and North America including members from the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument were used. A systematic literature search was done on 1 May 2018, and updated on 1 February 2019. RESULTS: Literature reporting specifically on umbilical and epigastric hernias was limited in quantity and quality, resulting in a majority of the recommendations being graded as weak, based on low-quality evidence. The main recommendation was to use mesh for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias to reduce the recurrence rate. Most umbilical and epigastric hernias may be repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh. A laparoscopic approach may be considered if the hernia defect is large, or if the patient has an increased risk of wound morbidity. CONCLUSION: This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. It is recommended that symptomatic umbilical and epigastric hernias are repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh.
650    _2
$a abdominální hernie $x chirurgie $7 D046449
650    _2
$a pupeční kýla $x chirurgie $7 D006554
650    _2
$a operace kýly $x metody $7 D059685
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
650    12
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
650    _2
$a zákroky plastické chirurgie $x metody $7 D019651
650    12
$a společnosti lékařské $7 D012955
650    _2
$a chirurgické síťky $7 D013526
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
651    _2
$a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Montgomery, A $u Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Kaufmann, R $u Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Tergooi, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Berrevoet, F $u Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
700    1_
$a East, B $u Third Department of Surgery at Motol University Hospital, First and Second Faculty of Medicine at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fischer, J $u University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
700    1_
$a Hope, W $u New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.
700    1_
$a Klassen, D $u Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
700    1_
$a Lorenz, R $u Praxis 3+ Chirurgen, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Renard, Y $u Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
700    1_
$a Garcia Urena, M A $u Henares University Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Simons, M P $u Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
710    2_
$a European and Americas Hernia Societies (EHS and AHS)
773    0_
$w MED00009388 $t The British journal of surgery $x 1365-2168 $g Roč. 107, č. 3 (2020), s. 171-190
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31916607 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114154201 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608874 $s 1119719
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 107 $c 3 $d 171-190 $e 20200109 $i 1365-2168 $m British journal of surgery $n Br J Surg $x MED00009388
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace