Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures

J. Kocis, M. Kelbl, T. Kocis, T. Návrat,

. 2020 ; 46 (1) : 147-152. [pub] 20180823

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028547
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2007-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) od 2007-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2007-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2007-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain. METHODS: A prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028547
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114154220.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00068-018-0998-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30167741
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kocis, Jan $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic. jankocis@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures / $c J. Kocis, M. Kelbl, T. Kocis, T. Návrat,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain. METHODS: A prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a krvácení při operaci $7 D016063
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $7 D005593
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D008159
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D019060
650    _2
$a délka operace $7 D061646
650    12
$a pedikulární šrouby $7 D065289
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a dávka záření $7 D011829
650    _2
$a fraktury páteře $x chirurgie $7 D016103
650    _2
$a hrudní obratle $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D013904
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Kelbl, Martin $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kocis, Tomas $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Návrat, Tomas $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00157536 $t European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society $x 1863-9941 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2020), s. 147-152
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30167741 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114154217 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608882 $s 1119727
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 46 $c 1 $d 147-152 $e 20180823 $i 1863-9941 $m European journal of trauma and emergency surgery $n Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg $x MED00157536
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...