-
Something wrong with this record ?
Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures
J. Kocis, M. Kelbl, T. Kocis, T. Návrat,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Lumbar Vertebrae injuries surgery MeSH
- Radiation Dosage MeSH
- Operative Time MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Spinal Fractures surgery MeSH
- Thoracic Vertebrae injuries surgery MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Blood Loss, Surgical MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pedicle Screws * MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain. METHODS: A prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028547
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114154220.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00068-018-0998-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30167741
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Kocis, Jan $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic. jankocis@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures / $c J. Kocis, M. Kelbl, T. Kocis, T. Návrat,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain. METHODS: A prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení při operaci $7 D016063
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a bederní obratle $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D008159
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D019060
- 650 _2
- $a délka operace $7 D061646
- 650 12
- $a pedikulární šrouby $7 D065289
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a dávka záření $7 D011829
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury páteře $x chirurgie $7 D016103
- 650 _2
- $a hrudní obratle $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D013904
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Kelbl, Martin $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kocis, Tomas $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Návrat, Tomas $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00157536 $t European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society $x 1863-9941 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2020), s. 147-152
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30167741 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114154217 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608882 $s 1119727
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 46 $c 1 $d 147-152 $e 20180823 $i 1863-9941 $m European journal of trauma and emergency surgery $n Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg $x MED00157536
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105