• Something wrong with this record ?

International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

B. Bach, A. Kerber, A. Aluja, T. Bastiaens, JW. Keeley, L. Claes, A. Fossati, F. Gutierrez, SES. Oliveira, R. Pires, KD. Riegel, JP. Rolland, I. Roskam, M. Sellbom, A. Somma, L. Spanemberg, W. Strus, JC. Thimm, AGC. Wright, J. Zimmermann,

. 2020 ; 53 (3-4) : 179-188. [pub] 20200505

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. METHODS: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. RESULTS: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).

Center for Personality Disorder Research Psychiatric Research Unit Region Zealand Slagelse Denmark

CICPSI Faculdade de Psicologia Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

Department of Addictology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University of Prague General University Hospital of Prague Prague Czechia

Department of Psychology Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany

Department of Psychology The Arctic University of Norway Tromsoe Norway

Department of Psychology University of Kassel Kassel Germany

Department of Psychology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand

Department of Psychology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Escola de Medicina Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Antwerp Leuven Belgium Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium

Faculty of Psychology Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Warsaw Poland

Institute of Psychology University of Brasília Brasília Brazil

Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research University of Lleida Catalonia Spain

Psychological Sciences Research Institute Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium

Psychology Department Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA

STAPS University Paris Nanterre Paris France

University Psychiatric Centre Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028688
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114154726.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1159/000507589 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32369820
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Bach, Bo $u Center for Personality Disorder Research, Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark, bbpn@regionsjaelland.dk.
245    10
$a International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1 / $c B. Bach, A. Kerber, A. Aluja, T. Bastiaens, JW. Keeley, L. Claes, A. Fossati, F. Gutierrez, SES. Oliveira, R. Pires, KD. Riegel, JP. Rolland, I. Roskam, M. Sellbom, A. Somma, L. Spanemberg, W. Strus, JC. Thimm, AGC. Wright, J. Zimmermann,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. METHODS: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. RESULTS: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).
650    12
$a Diagnostický a statistický manuál mentálních poruch $7 D039721
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mezinárodní klasifikace nemocí $x normy $7 D038801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a poruchy osobnosti $x klasifikace $7 D010554
650    _2
$a osobnostní dotazník $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010555
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kerber, André $u Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Aluja, Anton $u Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
700    1_
$a Bastiaens, Tim $u University Psychiatric Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Keeley, Jared W $u Psychology Department, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
700    1_
$a Claes, Laurence $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Leuven, Belgium. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Fossati, Andrea $u Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Gutierrez, Fernando $u Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Oliveira, Sérgio E S $u Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Pires, Rute $u CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
700    1_
$a Riegel, Karel D $u Department of Addictology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University of Prague, General University Hospital of Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Rolland, Jean-Pierre $u STAPS, University Paris-Nanterre, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Roskam, Isabelle $u Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Sellbom, Martin $u Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
700    1_
$a Somma, Antonella $u Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
700    1_
$a Spanemberg, Lucas $u Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Strus, Włodzimierz $u Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Thimm, Jens C $u Department of Psychology, The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsoe, Norway.
700    1_
$a Wright, Aidan G C $u Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
700    1_
$a Zimmermann, Johannes $u Department of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00003989 $t Psychopathology $x 1423-033X $g Roč. 53, č. 3-4 (2020), s. 179-188
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32369820 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114154723 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1609023 $s 1119868
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 53 $c 3-4 $d 179-188 $e 20200505 $i 1423-033X $m Psychopathology $n Psychopathology $x MED00003989
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...