-
Something wrong with this record ?
International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1
B. Bach, A. Kerber, A. Aluja, T. Bastiaens, JW. Keeley, L. Claes, A. Fossati, F. Gutierrez, SES. Oliveira, R. Pires, KD. Riegel, JP. Rolland, I. Roskam, M. Sellbom, A. Somma, L. Spanemberg, W. Strus, JC. Thimm, AGC. Wright, J. Zimmermann,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
32369820
DOI
10.1159/000507589
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- International Classification of Diseases standards MeSH
- Personality Inventory statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Personality Disorders classification MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. METHODS: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. RESULTS: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).
Center for Personality Disorder Research Psychiatric Research Unit Region Zealand Slagelse Denmark
CICPSI Faculdade de Psicologia Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
Department of Psychology Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Psychology The Arctic University of Norway Tromsoe Norway
Department of Psychology University of Kassel Kassel Germany
Department of Psychology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Department of Psychology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Escola de Medicina Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
Faculty of Psychology Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Warsaw Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Brasília Brasília Brazil
Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research University of Lleida Catalonia Spain
Psychological Sciences Research Institute Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium
Psychology Department Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
STAPS University Paris Nanterre Paris France
University Psychiatric Centre Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028688
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114154726.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000507589 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32369820
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Bach, Bo $u Center for Personality Disorder Research, Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark, bbpn@regionsjaelland.dk.
- 245 10
- $a International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1 / $c B. Bach, A. Kerber, A. Aluja, T. Bastiaens, JW. Keeley, L. Claes, A. Fossati, F. Gutierrez, SES. Oliveira, R. Pires, KD. Riegel, JP. Rolland, I. Roskam, M. Sellbom, A. Somma, L. Spanemberg, W. Strus, JC. Thimm, AGC. Wright, J. Zimmermann,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. METHODS: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. RESULTS: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).
- 650 12
- $a Diagnostický a statistický manuál mentálních poruch $7 D039721
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mezinárodní klasifikace nemocí $x normy $7 D038801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a poruchy osobnosti $x klasifikace $7 D010554
- 650 _2
- $a osobnostní dotazník $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010555
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kerber, André $u Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Aluja, Anton $u Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Bastiaens, Tim $u University Psychiatric Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Keeley, Jared W $u Psychology Department, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Claes, Laurence $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Leuven, Belgium. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Fossati, Andrea $u Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Gutierrez, Fernando $u Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Oliveira, Sérgio E S $u Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Brazil.
- 700 1_
- $a Pires, Rute $u CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Riegel, Karel D $u Department of Addictology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University of Prague, General University Hospital of Prague, Prague, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Rolland, Jean-Pierre $u STAPS, University Paris-Nanterre, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Roskam, Isabelle $u Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Sellbom, Martin $u Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
- 700 1_
- $a Somma, Antonella $u Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Spanemberg, Lucas $u Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
- 700 1_
- $a Strus, Włodzimierz $u Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Thimm, Jens C $u Department of Psychology, The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsoe, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Wright, Aidan G C $u Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Zimmermann, Johannes $u Department of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003989 $t Psychopathology $x 1423-033X $g Roč. 53, č. 3-4 (2020), s. 179-188
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32369820 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114154723 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1609023 $s 1119868
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 53 $c 3-4 $d 179-188 $e 20200505 $i 1423-033X $m Psychopathology $n Psychopathology $x MED00003989
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105