• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update

M. Babjuk, M. Burger, EM. Compérat, P. Gontero, AH. Mostafid, J. Palou, BWG. van Rhijn, M. Rouprêt, SF. Shariat, R. Sylvester, R. Zigeuner, O. Capoun, D. Cohen, JLD. Escrig, V. Hernández, B. Peyronnet, T. Seisen, V. Soukup,

. 2019 ; 76 (5) : 639-657. [pub] 20190820

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028766

CONTEXT: This overview presents the updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ (CIS). OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation and recommendations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the NMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since the last published version in 2017. Databases covered by the search included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Tumours staged as Ta, T1, and/or CIS are grouped under the heading of NMIBC. Diagnosis depends on cystoscopy and histological evaluation of the tissue obtained by transurethral resection (TURB) in papillary tumours or by multiple bladder biopsies in CIS. In papillary lesions, a complete TURB is essential for the patient's prognosis and correct diagnosis. Where the initial resection is incomplete, where there is no muscle in the specimen, or where a T1 tumour is detected, a second TURB should be performed within 2-6 wk. The risks of both recurrence and progression may be estimated for individual patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring system. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is pivotal to the recommendation of adjuvant treatment. In patients with tumours presumed to be at a low risk and in those presumed to be at an intermediate risk with a low previous recurrence rate and an expected EORTC recurrence score of <5, one immediate chemotherapy instillation is recommended. Patients with intermediate-risk tumours should receive 1 yr of full-dose bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical immunotherapy or instillations of chemotherapy for a maximum of 1 yr. In patients with high-risk tumours, full-dose intravesical BCG for 1-3 yr is indicated. In patients at the highest risk of tumour progression, immediate radical cystectomy should be considered. Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-unresponsive tumours. The extended version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website: https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/. CONCLUSIONS: These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Panel has released an updated version of their guidelines, which contains information on classification, risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatment of NMIBC. The recommendations are based on the current literature (until the end of 2018), with emphasis on high-level data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is essential for deciding appropriate use of adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations. Surgical removal of the bladder should be considered in case of BCG-unresponsive tumours or in NMIBCs with the highest risk of progression.

Department of Pathology Hôpital Tenon Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris UPMC Paris 6 Paris France

Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Hospital Motol Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Caritas St Josef Medical Centre University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Urology Fundació Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain

Department of Urology General University Hospital 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain

Department of Urology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London UK

Department of Urology Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford Surrey UK

Department of Urology University of Rennes Rennes France

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Molinette Hospital University of Studies of Torino Torino Italy

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Brussels Belgium

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Urology Department Sorbonne Université GRC n°5 ONCOTYPE URO AP HP Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028766
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114155130.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31443960
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Babjuk, Marko $u Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: Marek.Babjuk@fnmotol.cz.
245    10
$a European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update / $c M. Babjuk, M. Burger, EM. Compérat, P. Gontero, AH. Mostafid, J. Palou, BWG. van Rhijn, M. Rouprêt, SF. Shariat, R. Sylvester, R. Zigeuner, O. Capoun, D. Cohen, JLD. Escrig, V. Hernández, B. Peyronnet, T. Seisen, V. Soukup,
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: This overview presents the updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ (CIS). OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation and recommendations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the NMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since the last published version in 2017. Databases covered by the search included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Tumours staged as Ta, T1, and/or CIS are grouped under the heading of NMIBC. Diagnosis depends on cystoscopy and histological evaluation of the tissue obtained by transurethral resection (TURB) in papillary tumours or by multiple bladder biopsies in CIS. In papillary lesions, a complete TURB is essential for the patient's prognosis and correct diagnosis. Where the initial resection is incomplete, where there is no muscle in the specimen, or where a T1 tumour is detected, a second TURB should be performed within 2-6 wk. The risks of both recurrence and progression may be estimated for individual patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring system. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is pivotal to the recommendation of adjuvant treatment. In patients with tumours presumed to be at a low risk and in those presumed to be at an intermediate risk with a low previous recurrence rate and an expected EORTC recurrence score of <5, one immediate chemotherapy instillation is recommended. Patients with intermediate-risk tumours should receive 1 yr of full-dose bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical immunotherapy or instillations of chemotherapy for a maximum of 1 yr. In patients with high-risk tumours, full-dose intravesical BCG for 1-3 yr is indicated. In patients at the highest risk of tumour progression, immediate radical cystectomy should be considered. Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-unresponsive tumours. The extended version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website: https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/. CONCLUSIONS: These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Panel has released an updated version of their guidelines, which contains information on classification, risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatment of NMIBC. The recommendations are based on the current literature (until the end of 2018), with emphasis on high-level data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses. Stratification of patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups is essential for deciding appropriate use of adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations. Surgical removal of the bladder should be considered in case of BCG-unresponsive tumours or in NMIBCs with the highest risk of progression.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    12
$a management péče o pacienta $x metody $x normy $7 D010346
650    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $x normy $7 D017410
650    _2
$a společnosti lékařské $7 D012955
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x patologie $x terapie $7 D001749
650    12
$a urologie $x metody $x trendy $7 D014572
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Burger, Maximilian $u Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Compérat, Eva M $u Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UPMC Paris VI, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.
700    1_
$a Mostafid, A Hugh $u Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
700    1_
$a Palou, Joan $u Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a van Rhijn, Bas W G $u Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Rouprêt, Morgan $u Urology Department, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
700    1_
$a Sylvester, Richard $u European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Zigeuner, Richard $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
700    1_
$a Capoun, Otakar $u Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cohen, Daniel $u Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Escrig, José Luis Dominguez $u Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
700    1_
$a Hernández, Virginia $u Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Peyronnet, Benoit $u Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
700    1_
$a Seisen, Thomas $u Urology Department, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Soukup, Viktor $u Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 76, č. 5 (2019), s. 639-657
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31443960 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114155129 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1609101 $s 1119946
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 76 $c 5 $d 639-657 $e 20190820 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...