In this systematic review, we report on the effects of diuretic deprescribing compared to continued diuretic use. We included clinical studies reporting on outcomes such as mortality, heart failure recurrence, tolerability and feasibility. We assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework. We included 25 publications from 22 primary studies (15 randomized controlled trials; 7 nonrandomized studies). The mean number of participants in the deprescribing groups was 35, and median/mean age 64 years. In patients with heart failure, there was no clear evidence that diuretic deprescribing was associated with increased mortality compared to diuretic continuation (low certainty evidence). The risk of cardiovascular composite outcomes associated with diuretic deprescribing was inconsistent (studies showing lower risk for diuretic deprescribing, or comparable risk with diuretic continuation; very low certainty evidence). The effect on heart failure recurrence after diuretic deprescribing in patients with diuretics for heart failure, and of hypertension in patients with diuretics for hypertension was inconsistent across the included studies (low certainty evidence). In patients with diuretics for hypertension, diuretic deprescribing was well tolerated (moderate certainty evidence), while in patients with diuretics for heart failure, deprescribing diuretics can result in complaints of peripheral oedema (very low certainty evidence). The overall risk of bias was generally high. In summary, this systematic review suggests that diuretic discontinuation could be a safe and feasible treatment option for carefully selected patients. However, there isa lack of high-quality evidence on its feasibility, safety and tolerability of diuretic deprescribing, warranting further research.

• MeSH
• depreskripce * MeSH
• diuretika * škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hypertenze farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• medicína založená na důkazech MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
• srdeční selhání * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

• MeSH
• chylotorax * diagnóza   etiologie   farmakoterapie   vrozené   MeSH
• diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
• drenáž klasifikace   metody   MeSH
• kazuistiky jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management nemoci MeSH
• novorozenec MeSH
• respirační insuficience diagnóza   etiologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• novorozenec MeSH
• Publikační typ
• přehledy MeSH

Spontánní intracerebrální hemoragie (SICH) jsou spojeny s řadou rizikových faktorů, které můžeme rozdělit na faktory ovlivnitelné a neovlivnitelné. Jejich nejvýznamnějším rizikovým faktorem je arteriální hypertenze. Péče o pacienty se SICH musí být komplexní a multidisciplinární. V akutní fázi se stává imperativem snaha o co nejrychlejší korekci arteriální hypertenze a zvrácení účinku antikoagulační terapie. Do budoucna lze recentně očekávat dosažení lepšího výsledného klinického stavu u vybraných pacientů se supratentoriální (především lobární) SICH operovaných do 24 h s využitím minimálně invazivní parafascikulární chirurgie.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (SICH) are associated with a number of risk factors, which can be divided into controllable and uncontrollable factors. Their most important risk factor is arterial hypertension. The care for patients with SICH must be complex and multidisciplinary. In the acute phase, it becomes imperative to try to correct arterial hypertension and reverse the effect of anticoagulant therapy as quickly as possible. In the future, a better clinical outcome can recently be expected in selected patients with supratentorial (mainly lobar) SICH operated on within 24 h using minimally invasive parafascicular surgery.

• Klíčová slova
• spontánní intracerebrální hemoragie,
• MeSH
• antikoagulancia škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• cévní mozková příhoda diagnóza   etiologie   farmakoterapie   klasifikace   MeSH
• hypertenze diagnóza   klasifikace   komplikace   MeSH
• intrakraniální krvácení * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management nemoci MeSH
• miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony klasifikace   metody   MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

Kognitívna porucha (KP) po ischemickej cievnej mozgovej príhode (CMP) je častým fenoménom. U niektorých pacientov môže KP pretrvávať aj dlhý čas po prekonanej CMP, čo sa v anglickej literatúre označuje ako PCSI - post stroke cognitive impairment. Ide o osobitnú nozologickú jednotku, ktorú je potrebné začať diagnostikovať už počas hospitalizácie, no definitívnu diagnózu je možné vykonať až následne kontrolným vyšetrením kognitívnych funkcií s odstupom šesť mesiacov od CMP. Článok prináša aktuálny prehľad o diagnostike, predikcii a terapii PSCI ako osobitnej nozologickej jednotky.

Cognitive impairment (CI) after stroke is a frequent phenomenon. In some patients, CI can persist for a long time after overcoming stroke, which is referred to in the English literature as PCSI - post stroke cognitive impairment. It is a special nosological entity that needs to be diagnosed already during hospitalization, but a definitive diagnosis can only be made subsequently by a control examination of cognitive functions six months after stroke. The following article provides an up-to-date overview of the diagnosis, prediction and therapy of PSCI as a special nosological unit.

• MeSH
• cévní mozková příhoda * diagnóza   komplikace   patofyziologie   MeSH
• demence diagnóza   etiologie   MeSH
• diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
• kognitivní dysfunkce * diagnóza   etiologie   farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management nemoci MeSH
• neurozobrazování klasifikace   metody   MeSH
• testy pro posouzení mentálních funkcí a demence MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

Chronická bolest představuje významný celospolečenský socio-ekonomický problém. Výraznou měrou se podílí na invalidizaci obyvatelstva vyspělých zemí světa a nepříznivě ovlivňuje kvalitu života. Strategie léčby chronické bolesti je multimodální; zahrnuje farmakoterapii, rehabilitační léčbu, psychoterapii, invazivní metody a některé další léčebné možnosti. Základní strategie léčby bolesti vychází z třístupňového analgetického žebříčku WHO. Základem léčby chronické bolesti jsou neopioidní analgetika, dle intenzity bolesti kombinovaná se slabými nebo silnými opioidy. Tato léčba může být doplňována adjuvantní analgetickou medikací. Opioidy v poslední době dělíme i na konvenční a atypické. Zástupcem atypických opioidů je především buprenorfin a tapentadol.

Chronic pain is a major society-wide socio-economic problem. It significantly contributes to the population disability rate in developed countries and adversely affects the quality of life. The strategy of chronic pain management is multimodal, involving pharmacotherapy, rehabilitation therapy, psychotherapy, invasive methods, and some other therapeutic options. The basic pain management strategy is based on the WHO three-step analgesic ladder. Non-opioid analgesics are the mainstay of chronic pain management, combined with weak or strong opioids depending on the intensity of pain. This treatment can be supplemented with adjuvant analgesic medication. Recently, opioids have also been classified into conventional and atypical ones. Buprenorphine and tapentadol are the main examples of atypical opioids.

• MeSH
• buprenorfin farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• chronická bolest * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• kvalita života MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management bolesti metody   MeSH
• opioidní analgetika farmakologie   klasifikace   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• tapentadol farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• tramadol farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• přehledy MeSH

In the previous article, the author demonstrated the close relationship between bloodletting practices in medieval Europe and acupuncture in Traditional Chinese Medicine. This study aimed to explore how acupuncture-based treatment was applied in medieval Europe. The author hypothesizes that the physical stimulation of acupuncture points associated with bloodletting was one of the main methods of pain management at that time. The study examined the indications for phlebotomy as depicted in the original illustration from Practica Medicinalis written by the 15th-century Archbishop of Prague, Sigismundus Albicus, supplemented by two other European medieval medical manuscripts. A total of 76 distinct symptoms (corresponding to 25 bloodletting acupuncture points) from the Practica Medicinalis illustration were assembled into four groups: 1) Pain and inflammation symptoms; 2) Symptoms commonly associated with pain and inflammation; 3) General symptoms affecting various organs and functions; and 4) Conditions unrelated to pain or inflammation. Among the 76 symptoms and 25 acupuncture points, only nine symptoms and a single bloodletting point were not associated with the treatment of pain or inflammation. This suggests that acupuncture-based therapy was an effective method for managing pain and inflammation in the Middle Ages and that such treatment could still be valuable from a modern clinical perspective.

• MeSH
• akupunkturní body * MeSH
• akupunkturní terapie * dějiny   MeSH
• bolest dějiny   MeSH
• dějiny středověku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management bolesti * dějiny   metody   MeSH
• zánět * dějiny   terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dějiny středověku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• historické články MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• imunoterapie * metody   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie   sekundární   patologie   MeSH
• lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metastázy nádorů MeSH
• míra přežití MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• staging nádorů MeSH
• urologické nádory farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Although there is growing evidence of the association between gender and early diagnosis of preclinical Alzheimer's disease, little attention has been given to the enrolment ratio of men and women in clinical trials and data reporting. METHODS: This study aims to analyze gender differences in sociodemographic factors associated with the willingness to participate in clinical trials and undergo specific procedures in the context of an Alzheimer's disease prevention research cohort. 2544 cognitively unimpaired participants from the ALFA parent cohort (age 45-75 years) of the Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center were contacted through a structured phone call to determine their willingness to participate in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials and undergo trial-related procedures (magnetic resonance imaging, lumbar puncture, positron emission tomography, and cognitive assessment). Sociodemographic data on education, occupational attainment, civil and caregiver status were gathered. Stepwise logistic regression models were performed in order to study the interaction between gender and sociodemographic factors in the willingness to participate in clinical trials and to undergo clinical trial-related procedures. RESULTS: 1,606 out of the 2,544 participants were women (63.1%). Women were significantly younger and had lower educational attainment compared with men. In addition, women were more likely to be caregivers, single and unemployed. Women showed a significantly lower willingness than men to participate in a clinical trial (p = 0.003) and to undergo a lumbar puncture (p < 0.001). Single women were less willing to participate in clinical trials than single men (p = 0.041). Regarding clinical trial-related procedures, women with higher years of education were significantly less willing to undergo a lumbar puncture (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: We found gender differences regarding the sociodemographic factors that predict the willingness to participate in clinical trials and to undergo clinical trial-related procedures. Our results highlight the urgent need to design recruitment strategies accounting for gender-related factors, particularly those related to marital status and education.

• MeSH
• Alzheimerova nemoc * psychologie   MeSH
• klinické zkoušky jako téma * psychologie   MeSH
• kohortové studie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• pohlavní dimorfismus MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sexuální faktory MeSH
• stupeň vzdělání MeSH
• výběr pacientů MeSH
• zapojení pacienta psychologie   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

CONTEXT: Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) was introduced as a new entity replacing the diagnosis of noninvasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Significant variability in the incidence of NIFTP diagnosed in different world regions has been reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of adoption of NIFTP, change in practice patterns, and uniformity in applying diagnostic criteria among pathologists practicing in different regions. METHODS: Two surveys distributed to pathologists of the International Endocrine Pathology Discussion Group with multiple-choice questions on NIFTP adoption into pathology practice and whole slide images of 5 tumors to collect information on nuclear score and diagnosis. Forty-eight endocrine pathologists, including 24 from North America, 8 from Europe, and 16 from Asia/Oceania completed the first survey and 38 the second survey. RESULTS: A 94% adoption rate of NIFTP by the pathologists was found. Yet, the frequency of rendering NIFTP diagnosis was significantly higher in North America than in other regions (P = .009). While the highest concordance was found in diagnosing lesions with mildly or well-developed PTC-like nuclei, there was significant variability in nuclear scoring and diagnosing NIFTP for tumors with moderate nuclear changes (nuclear score 2) (case 2, P < .05). Pathologists practicing in North America and Europe showed a tendency for lower thresholds for PTC-like nuclei and NIFTP than those practicing in Asia/Oceania. CONCLUSION: Despite a high adoption rate of NIFTP across geographic regions, NIFTP is diagnosed more often by pathologists in North America. Significant differences remain in diagnosing intermediate PTC-like nuclei and respectively NIFTP, with more conservative nuclear scoring in Asia/Oceania, which may explain the geographic differences in NIFTP incidence.

• MeSH
• buněčné jádro patologie   MeSH
• folikulární adenokarcinom * patologie   epidemiologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory štítné žlázy * epidemiologie   patologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• papilární karcinom štítné žlázy epidemiologie   patologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• papilární karcinom patologie   epidemiologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Asie MeSH
• Evropa MeSH
• Oceánie MeSH
• Severní Amerika MeSH

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

• MeSH
• chronická nemoc MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• management nemoci MeSH
• nosní polypy * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• rinosinusitida * diagnóza   terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• přehledy MeSH