-
Something wrong with this record ?
Treatment Patterns and Real-World Outcomes for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy
MR. Hassler, V. Moedlagl, H. Hindinger, J. Krauter, S. Klager, I. Resch, N. Huebner, O. Yurdakul, H. Ofner, SM. Korn, D. D'Andrea, K. Gust, SF. Shariat
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Immunotherapy * methods MeSH
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * therapeutic use MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * drug therapy secondary pathology MeSH
- Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * drug therapy pathology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Urologic Neoplasms drug therapy pathology MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25004144
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206105951.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.euf.2023.12.005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38161107
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Hassler, Melanie R $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 10
- $a Treatment Patterns and Real-World Outcomes for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy / $c MR. Hassler, V. Moedlagl, H. Hindinger, J. Krauter, S. Klager, I. Resch, N. Huebner, O. Yurdakul, H. Ofner, SM. Korn, D. D'Andrea, K. Gust, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a imunoterapie $x metody $7 D007167
- 650 12
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $x patologie $7 D002295
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 12
- $a inhibitory kontrolních bodů $x terapeutické užití $7 D000082082
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D001749
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a urologické nádory $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D014571
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010818
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Moedlagl, Verena $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Hindinger, Hanna $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Krauter, Johanna $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Klager, Sonja $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Resch, Irene $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Huebner, Nicolai $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Yurdakul, Ozan $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Ofner, Heidemarie $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Korn, Stephan M $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Gust, Kilian $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: sfshariat@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 10, č. 5 (2024), s. 779-787
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38161107 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206105947 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263725 $s 1240151
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 5 $d 779-787 $e 20231230 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121