Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Predatory in Scientific Publishing - a Burning Issue in Science

Doncho Donev

Language English Country Czech Republic

Background: Predatory publishers and so-called hijacked or fraudulent journals, are threats to the quality of published articles and waste valuable research and manuscripts when scholars and authors submit and publish their works in these journals. Objective: The aim of the paper is to point out the problem, causes and consequences of predatory publishing, characteristics and features of predatory publishers and fraudulent or fake journals and how to prevent and avoid publishing in such journals. Methods: Exploring the web blog of Jeffrey Beall and debate about Beall’s list of predatory publishers and journals and review of the relevant published literature, as well as personal experience and observations of the author. Results: Jeffrey Beall, an American librarian and library scientist from Denver, University of Colorado, has drawn attention to “predatory open access publishing” and created widely known Beall’s lists of potentially predatory publishers and open-access predatory journals publishing submitted manuscripts promptly without the reviewing process and with a high rate of publication fee. The debate initiated by Jeffrey Beall is continuing in the scientific community with increased number of authors and published articles on this still unresolved issue in the last about 10 years. The features of fraudulent or fake journals, threats and consequences are discussed as well. Conclusion: Increasing awareness in the scientific community is essential how to differentiate trustworthy-reliable journals and predatory ones and to avoid predatory journals. Continuous education of authors about predatory publishers and journals, both the existing and the newly-emerging wave of scholars, must be the purpose and the imperative of the academic community. In order to protect the peer review process, the academic and scientific community must set the criteria for scientific advancement by not recognizing and valuing the articles published in the predatory journals.

References provided by Crossref.org

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21000469
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240903203732.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
210112s2020 xr fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    0_
$a 10.5455/ijbh.2020.108-112 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Donev, Doncho $u Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
245    10
$a Predatory in Scientific Publishing - a Burning Issue in Science / $c Doncho Donev
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Background: Predatory publishers and so-called hijacked or fraudulent journals, are threats to the quality of published articles and waste valuable research and manuscripts when scholars and authors submit and publish their works in these journals. Objective: The aim of the paper is to point out the problem, causes and consequences of predatory publishing, characteristics and features of predatory publishers and fraudulent or fake journals and how to prevent and avoid publishing in such journals. Methods: Exploring the web blog of Jeffrey Beall and debate about Beall’s list of predatory publishers and journals and review of the relevant published literature, as well as personal experience and observations of the author. Results: Jeffrey Beall, an American librarian and library scientist from Denver, University of Colorado, has drawn attention to “predatory open access publishing” and created widely known Beall’s lists of potentially predatory publishers and open-access predatory journals publishing submitted manuscripts promptly without the reviewing process and with a high rate of publication fee. The debate initiated by Jeffrey Beall is continuing in the scientific community with increased number of authors and published articles on this still unresolved issue in the last about 10 years. The features of fraudulent or fake journals, threats and consequences are discussed as well. Conclusion: Increasing awareness in the scientific community is essential how to differentiate trustworthy-reliable journals and predatory ones and to avoid predatory journals. Continuous education of authors about predatory publishers and journals, both the existing and the newly-emerging wave of scholars, must be the purpose and the imperative of the academic community. In order to protect the peer review process, the academic and scientific community must set the criteria for scientific advancement by not recognizing and valuing the articles published in the predatory journals.
650    17
$a predátorské časopisy jako téma $7 D000090282 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a periodika jako téma $7 D010506 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a publikování $x etika $x trendy $7 D011643 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a posudkové řízení ve výzkumu $7 D017712 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a publikování v režimu Open Access $7 D066295 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a vědecká komunikace $7 D000073820 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
653    00
$a Beallovy seznamy
653    00
$a predátorští vydavatelé
773    0_
$t International journal on biomedicine and healthcare $x 1805-8698 $g Roč. 8, č. 2 (2020), s. 108-112 $w MED00188409
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210112113001 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240903203728 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1607068 $s 1120742
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 8 $c 2 $d 108-112 $i 1805-8698 $m International journal on biomedicine and healthcare $x MED00188409
LZP    __
$c NLK194 $d 20240903 $a NLK 2021-04/kv

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...