-
Something wrong with this record ?
Predatory in Scientific Publishing - a Burning Issue in Science
Doncho Donev
Language English Country Czech Republic
Digital library NLK
Source
NLK
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
- Keywords
- Beallovy seznamy, predátorští vydavatelé,
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Periodicals as Topic MeSH
- Peer Review, Research MeSH
- Predatory Journals as Topic * MeSH
- Open Access Publishing MeSH
- Publishing ethics trends MeSH
- Scholarly Communication MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
Background: Predatory publishers and so-called hijacked or fraudulent journals, are threats to the quality of published articles and waste valuable research and manuscripts when scholars and authors submit and publish their works in these journals. Objective: The aim of the paper is to point out the problem, causes and consequences of predatory publishing, characteristics and features of predatory publishers and fraudulent or fake journals and how to prevent and avoid publishing in such journals. Methods: Exploring the web blog of Jeffrey Beall and debate about Beall’s list of predatory publishers and journals and review of the relevant published literature, as well as personal experience and observations of the author. Results: Jeffrey Beall, an American librarian and library scientist from Denver, University of Colorado, has drawn attention to “predatory open access publishing” and created widely known Beall’s lists of potentially predatory publishers and open-access predatory journals publishing submitted manuscripts promptly without the reviewing process and with a high rate of publication fee. The debate initiated by Jeffrey Beall is continuing in the scientific community with increased number of authors and published articles on this still unresolved issue in the last about 10 years. The features of fraudulent or fake journals, threats and consequences are discussed as well. Conclusion: Increasing awareness in the scientific community is essential how to differentiate trustworthy-reliable journals and predatory ones and to avoid predatory journals. Continuous education of authors about predatory publishers and journals, both the existing and the newly-emerging wave of scholars, must be the purpose and the imperative of the academic community. In order to protect the peer review process, the academic and scientific community must set the criteria for scientific advancement by not recognizing and valuing the articles published in the predatory journals.
References provided by Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21000469
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240903203732.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 210112s2020 xr fs 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 0_
- $a 10.5455/ijbh.2020.108-112 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Donev, Doncho $u Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
- 245 10
- $a Predatory in Scientific Publishing - a Burning Issue in Science / $c Doncho Donev
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Predatory publishers and so-called hijacked or fraudulent journals, are threats to the quality of published articles and waste valuable research and manuscripts when scholars and authors submit and publish their works in these journals. Objective: The aim of the paper is to point out the problem, causes and consequences of predatory publishing, characteristics and features of predatory publishers and fraudulent or fake journals and how to prevent and avoid publishing in such journals. Methods: Exploring the web blog of Jeffrey Beall and debate about Beall’s list of predatory publishers and journals and review of the relevant published literature, as well as personal experience and observations of the author. Results: Jeffrey Beall, an American librarian and library scientist from Denver, University of Colorado, has drawn attention to “predatory open access publishing” and created widely known Beall’s lists of potentially predatory publishers and open-access predatory journals publishing submitted manuscripts promptly without the reviewing process and with a high rate of publication fee. The debate initiated by Jeffrey Beall is continuing in the scientific community with increased number of authors and published articles on this still unresolved issue in the last about 10 years. The features of fraudulent or fake journals, threats and consequences are discussed as well. Conclusion: Increasing awareness in the scientific community is essential how to differentiate trustworthy-reliable journals and predatory ones and to avoid predatory journals. Continuous education of authors about predatory publishers and journals, both the existing and the newly-emerging wave of scholars, must be the purpose and the imperative of the academic community. In order to protect the peer review process, the academic and scientific community must set the criteria for scientific advancement by not recognizing and valuing the articles published in the predatory journals.
- 650 17
- $a predátorské časopisy jako téma $7 D000090282 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a periodika jako téma $7 D010506 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a publikování $x etika $x trendy $7 D011643 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a posudkové řízení ve výzkumu $7 D017712 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a publikování v režimu Open Access $7 D066295 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a vědecká komunikace $7 D000073820 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 653 00
- $a Beallovy seznamy
- 653 00
- $a predátorští vydavatelé
- 773 0_
- $t International journal on biomedicine and healthcare $x 1805-8698 $g Roč. 8, č. 2 (2020), s. 108-112 $w MED00188409
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210112113001 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240903203728 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1607068 $s 1120742
- BAS __
- $a 3 $a 4
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 8 $c 2 $d 108-112 $i 1805-8698 $m International journal on biomedicine and healthcare $x MED00188409
- LZP __
- $c NLK194 $d 20240903 $a NLK 2021-04/kv