• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Markers of oxidative stress after three days of nanoTiO2 sunscreen use in humans: a pilot study

D. Pelclová, T. Navrátil, Z. Fenclová, Š. Vlčková

. 2020 ; 28 (Suppl.) : S17-S21. [pub] 20201018

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21003980

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2004
ProQuest Central od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2006-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources od 1993

OBJECTIVE: Recent experimental studies point to a high reactivity of nanoparticles and the potential of sunscreens to penetrate the skin. We measured 20 markers of oxidative stress and inflammation to find out whether skin exposure to nanoTiO2 sunscreen may elevate the level of the markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and urine of exposed subjects, as was suggested by our earlier study. METHODS: Six volunteers (3 males and 3 females), with a mean age of 48.0 ± 6.7 years, used commercial sunscreen for three days continuously. The first samples were collected before the test. The second samples were collected on day 4, before the sunscreen was washed off, and the third samples on day 11. The following biomarkers were measured: malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal, 4-hydroxy-trans-nonenal, aldehydes C6-C12, 8-isoProstaglandin F2α, o-tyrosine, 3-chlorotyrosine, 3-nitrotyrosine, 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, 5-hydroxymethyl uracil, and leukotrienes B4, C4, D4, and E4, using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the urine, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal was significantly higher in post-exposure sample 2, and the same trend was seen in all urinary markers. In EBC, no difference was seen between the mean values of 20 post-test markers as compared with pre-test samples. CONCLUSION: This study suggests potential side effects of the sunscreen - borderline elevation of markers of oxidative stress/inflammation - which may relate to the absorption of the nanoTiO2, and the non-significant difference may be explained by the small number of subjects. The effect was not seen in EBC, where nanoTiO2 was not found. A larger study is needed, as according to our previous study, the beneficial effect of the sunscreen to suppress oxidative stress caused by UV radiation may be questioned.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21003980
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210215124624.0
007      
ta
008      
210209s2020 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a6158 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33069176
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Pelclová, Daniela, $d 1953- $7 nlk20010096163 $u Department of Occupational Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Markers of oxidative stress after three days of nanoTiO2 sunscreen use in humans: a pilot study / $c D. Pelclová, T. Navrátil, Z. Fenclová, Š. Vlčková
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Recent experimental studies point to a high reactivity of nanoparticles and the potential of sunscreens to penetrate the skin. We measured 20 markers of oxidative stress and inflammation to find out whether skin exposure to nanoTiO2 sunscreen may elevate the level of the markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and urine of exposed subjects, as was suggested by our earlier study. METHODS: Six volunteers (3 males and 3 females), with a mean age of 48.0 ± 6.7 years, used commercial sunscreen for three days continuously. The first samples were collected before the test. The second samples were collected on day 4, before the sunscreen was washed off, and the third samples on day 11. The following biomarkers were measured: malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal, 4-hydroxy-trans-nonenal, aldehydes C6-C12, 8-isoProstaglandin F2α, o-tyrosine, 3-chlorotyrosine, 3-nitrotyrosine, 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, 5-hydroxymethyl uracil, and leukotrienes B4, C4, D4, and E4, using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the urine, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal was significantly higher in post-exposure sample 2, and the same trend was seen in all urinary markers. In EBC, no difference was seen between the mean values of 20 post-test markers as compared with pre-test samples. CONCLUSION: This study suggests potential side effects of the sunscreen - borderline elevation of markers of oxidative stress/inflammation - which may relate to the absorption of the nanoTiO2, and the non-significant difference may be explained by the small number of subjects. The effect was not seen in EBC, where nanoTiO2 was not found. A larger study is needed, as according to our previous study, the beneficial effect of the sunscreen to suppress oxidative stress caused by UV radiation may be questioned.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a biologické markery $x chemie $7 D015415
650    12
$a dechové testy $7 D001944
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a oxidační stres $x účinky léků $7 D018384
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    12
$a přípravky chránící proti slunci $7 D013473
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Navrátil, Tomáš, $d 1967- $7 xx0079535 $u J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fenclová, Zdeňka $7 xx0074215 $u Department of Occupational Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vlčková, Štěpánka $7 xx0162780 $u Department of Occupational Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 28, Suppl. (2020), s. S17-S21
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33069176 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210209 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210211161758 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1621504 $s 1124290
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 28 $c Suppl. $d S17-S21 $e 20201018 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20210209

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace