-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Guilt and Shame Experience Scale (GSES) on a Representative Adolescent Sample: A Low Differentiation between Guilt and Shame
K. Malinakova, J. Furstova, M. Kalman, R. Trnka
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2004
PubMed
33266107
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17238901
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- emoce MeSH
- faktorová analýza statistická MeSH
- hanba * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- vina * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The Guilt and Shame Experience Scale (GSES) is a new, brief self-report instrument for assessing experiences of guilt and shame. It includes two distinct scales: feelings of shame and feelings of guilt. The present report focuses on results from a final validation study using a nationally representative sample of 7899 adolescents (M age = 14.5 ± 1.1 years, 50.7% boys) who participated in the 2014 Health Behavior in School-aged Children study. For factor analysis, the dataset was divided into two groups. One group (n = 3950) was used for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the second (n = 3949) for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The EFA results in a one-factor model of the GSES scale, while the CFA suggests a two-factor solution mirroring two scales, feelings of shame and feelings of guilt. Both models have a good fit to the data, and the scale also showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). A nonparametric comparison of different sociodemographic groups showed a higher disposition for experiencing guilt and shame among girls, students of the ninth grade, and religious respondents. A comparison of the results to previously published results obtained from adults indicates that adolescence is a developmental period involving low differentiation between moral emotions like guilt and shame compared with adulthood. Moreover, positive association with religious attendance shows a need of addressing these issues in a pastoral care setting.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21011826
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220530110520.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210420s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph17238901 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33266107
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Malinakova, Klara $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 245 12
- $a A Psychometric Evaluation of the Guilt and Shame Experience Scale (GSES) on a Representative Adolescent Sample: A Low Differentiation between Guilt and Shame / $c K. Malinakova, J. Furstova, M. Kalman, R. Trnka
- 520 9_
- $a The Guilt and Shame Experience Scale (GSES) is a new, brief self-report instrument for assessing experiences of guilt and shame. It includes two distinct scales: feelings of shame and feelings of guilt. The present report focuses on results from a final validation study using a nationally representative sample of 7899 adolescents (M age = 14.5 ± 1.1 years, 50.7% boys) who participated in the 2014 Health Behavior in School-aged Children study. For factor analysis, the dataset was divided into two groups. One group (n = 3950) was used for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the second (n = 3949) for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The EFA results in a one-factor model of the GSES scale, while the CFA suggests a two-factor solution mirroring two scales, feelings of shame and feelings of guilt. Both models have a good fit to the data, and the scale also showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). A nonparametric comparison of different sociodemographic groups showed a higher disposition for experiencing guilt and shame among girls, students of the ninth grade, and religious respondents. A comparison of the results to previously published results obtained from adults indicates that adolescence is a developmental period involving low differentiation between moral emotions like guilt and shame compared with adulthood. Moreover, positive association with religious attendance shows a need of addressing these issues in a pastoral care setting.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a emoce $7 D004644
- 650 _2
- $a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a vina $7 D006167
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 12
- $a hanba $7 D012752
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Fürstová, Jana $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 _AN042275
- 700 1_
- $a Kalman, Michal $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Living, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Trnka, Radek $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Science and Research Department, Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Hekrova 805, 149 00 Praha 4-Háje, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 17, č. 23 (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33266107 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210420 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220530110518 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1650255 $s 1132205
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 17 $c 23 $e 20201130 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210420