-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow of endoscopy units: an international survey
T. Resál, R. Bor, K. Szántó, A. Fábián, M. Rutka, M. Sacco, DG. Ribaldone, P. Molander, S. Nancey, U. Kopylov, S. Vavricka, D. Drobne, M. Lukas, K. Farkas, Z. Szepes, T. Molnár
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2018
Free Medical Journals
od 2008
PubMed Central
od 2008
Europe PubMed Central
od 2008
ProQuest Central
od 2017-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2017-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2008
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. Results: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.
Abdominal Center Gastroenterology Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology Zurich Switzerland
Department of Gastroenterology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Department of Medical Sciences Division of Gastroenterology University of Turin Turin Piemonte Italy
Gastroenterology Unit Department of Medicine University of Szeged Szeged Hungary
IBD Clinical and Research Centre Iscare a s Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21017920
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210729104202.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210726s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/17562848211006678 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33995580
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Resál, Tamás $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 245 10
- $a Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow of endoscopy units: an international survey / $c T. Resál, R. Bor, K. Szántó, A. Fábián, M. Rutka, M. Sacco, DG. Ribaldone, P. Molander, S. Nancey, U. Kopylov, S. Vavricka, D. Drobne, M. Lukas, K. Farkas, Z. Szepes, T. Molnár
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. Results: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bor, Renáta $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Szántó, Kata $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Fábián, Anna $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Rutka, Mariann $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Sacco, Marco $u Endoscopy Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Torino, Piemonte, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Ribaldone, Davide Guiseppe $u Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Turin, Turin, Piemonte, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Molander, Pauliina $u Abdominal Center, Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Nancey, Stephane $u Department of Gastroenterology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon and INSERM U1111, CIRI, Lyon, France
- 700 1_
- $a Kopylov, Uri $u Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- 700 1_
- $a Vavricka, Stephan $u Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Drobne, David $u Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 700 1_
- $a Lukas, Milan $u IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Iscare a.s., Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Farkas, Klaudia $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Szepes, Zoltán $u Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Molnár, Tamás $u Gastroenterology Unit, First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária sugárút 57, Szeged, 6725, Hungary
- 773 0_
- $w MED00177174 $t Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology $x 1756-283X $g Roč. 14, č. - (2021), s. 17562848211006678
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33995580 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210726 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210729104201 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1676464 $s 1138362
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 14 $c - $d 17562848211006678 $e 20210422 $i 1756-283X $m Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology $n Therap Adv Gastroenterol $x MED00177174
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210726