-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Potentiating Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading Are Dependent Upon Relative Strength
JJ. Merrigan, JJ. Tufano, MT. Jones
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- bolest MeSH
- kosterní svaly MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- odporový trénink * MeSH
- svalová síla MeSH
- terapie cvičením MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
ABSTRACT: Merrigan, JJ, Tufano, JJ, and Jones, MT. Potentiating effects of accentuated eccentric loading are dependent upon relative strength. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1208-1216, 2021-The purpose was to evaluate the acute effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on bench press velocity and subsequent perceived effort (ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) and soreness. Resistance-trained men (n = 8) and women (n = 2) completed 4 sets of 5 bench press repetitions with AEL and traditional loading (TL) using concentric loads of 50% (AEL50, TL50) and 65% (AEL65, TL65) 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Throughout each TL set, the eccentric load remained identical to the concentric. Variable resistance during the first repetition of AEL equaled 120% 1RM. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to evaluate differences between AEL and TL (p < 0.05). For the first repetition, AEL50 and AEL65 resulted in slower eccentric and concentric velocities. The increasing slope of eccentric and concentric velocity across repetitions was greater during AEL50 and AEL65 compared with TL50 and TL65, respectively (p < 0.05). As an individual's strength increased, AEL50 resulted in slower eccentric velocity and faster concentric velocity than TL50. The AEL65 resulted in faster concentric velocity than TL65 (p < 0.05). Mean protocol comparisons revealed trivial to small effects between AEL and TL. There were no differences in RPE or soreness between protocols with soreness ratings remaining unchanged from baseline (1.80 ± 0.20 AU; p < 0.05). Overall, AEL was not effective for increasing concentric velocity during the bench press with current loading protocols. Yet, stronger individuals may exhibit increases in concentric velocity from AEL, which may be a result of different pacing strategies employed during the eccentric phase. Furthermore, when using the current AEL protocols, eccentric intensities were increased with no greater RPE or soreness.
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic
School of Kinesiology George Mason University Manassas Virginia
School of Sport Recreation and Tourism Management George Mason University Fairfax Virginia
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21018706
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830100304.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33651736
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Merrigan, Justin J $u Human Performance Innovation Center, Rockefellar Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia $u School of Kinesiology, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia $u Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
- 245 10
- $a Potentiating Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading Are Dependent Upon Relative Strength / $c JJ. Merrigan, JJ. Tufano, MT. Jones
- 520 9_
- $a ABSTRACT: Merrigan, JJ, Tufano, JJ, and Jones, MT. Potentiating effects of accentuated eccentric loading are dependent upon relative strength. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1208-1216, 2021-The purpose was to evaluate the acute effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on bench press velocity and subsequent perceived effort (ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) and soreness. Resistance-trained men (n = 8) and women (n = 2) completed 4 sets of 5 bench press repetitions with AEL and traditional loading (TL) using concentric loads of 50% (AEL50, TL50) and 65% (AEL65, TL65) 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Throughout each TL set, the eccentric load remained identical to the concentric. Variable resistance during the first repetition of AEL equaled 120% 1RM. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to evaluate differences between AEL and TL (p < 0.05). For the first repetition, AEL50 and AEL65 resulted in slower eccentric and concentric velocities. The increasing slope of eccentric and concentric velocity across repetitions was greater during AEL50 and AEL65 compared with TL50 and TL65, respectively (p < 0.05). As an individual's strength increased, AEL50 resulted in slower eccentric velocity and faster concentric velocity than TL50. The AEL65 resulted in faster concentric velocity than TL65 (p < 0.05). Mean protocol comparisons revealed trivial to small effects between AEL and TL. There were no differences in RPE or soreness between protocols with soreness ratings remaining unchanged from baseline (1.80 ± 0.20 AU; p < 0.05). Overall, AEL was not effective for increasing concentric velocity during the bench press with current loading protocols. Yet, stronger individuals may exhibit increases in concentric velocity from AEL, which may be a result of different pacing strategies employed during the eccentric phase. Furthermore, when using the current AEL protocols, eccentric intensities were increased with no greater RPE or soreness.
- 650 _2
- $a terapie cvičením $7 D005081
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a svalová síla $7 D053580
- 650 _2
- $a kosterní svaly $7 D018482
- 650 _2
- $a bolest $7 D010146
- 650 12
- $a odporový trénink $7 D055070
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tufano, James J $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; and
- 700 1_
- $a Jones, Margaret T $u Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia $u School of Sport, Recreation, and Tourism Management, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008742 $t Journal of strength and conditioning research $x 1533-4287 $g Roč. 35, č. 5 (2021), s. 1208-1216
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33651736 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830100304 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1689720 $s 1139152
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 35 $c 5 $d 1208-1216 $e 2021May01 $i 1533-4287 $m Journal of strength and conditioning research $n J Strength Cond Res $x MED00008742
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728