• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Potentiating Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading Are Dependent Upon Relative Strength

JJ. Merrigan, JJ. Tufano, MT. Jones

. 2021 ; 35 (5) : 1208-1216. [pub] 2021May01

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018706

ABSTRACT: Merrigan, JJ, Tufano, JJ, and Jones, MT. Potentiating effects of accentuated eccentric loading are dependent upon relative strength. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1208-1216, 2021-The purpose was to evaluate the acute effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on bench press velocity and subsequent perceived effort (ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) and soreness. Resistance-trained men (n = 8) and women (n = 2) completed 4 sets of 5 bench press repetitions with AEL and traditional loading (TL) using concentric loads of 50% (AEL50, TL50) and 65% (AEL65, TL65) 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Throughout each TL set, the eccentric load remained identical to the concentric. Variable resistance during the first repetition of AEL equaled 120% 1RM. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to evaluate differences between AEL and TL (p < 0.05). For the first repetition, AEL50 and AEL65 resulted in slower eccentric and concentric velocities. The increasing slope of eccentric and concentric velocity across repetitions was greater during AEL50 and AEL65 compared with TL50 and TL65, respectively (p < 0.05). As an individual's strength increased, AEL50 resulted in slower eccentric velocity and faster concentric velocity than TL50. The AEL65 resulted in faster concentric velocity than TL65 (p < 0.05). Mean protocol comparisons revealed trivial to small effects between AEL and TL. There were no differences in RPE or soreness between protocols with soreness ratings remaining unchanged from baseline (1.80 ± 0.20 AU; p < 0.05). Overall, AEL was not effective for increasing concentric velocity during the bench press with current loading protocols. Yet, stronger individuals may exhibit increases in concentric velocity from AEL, which may be a result of different pacing strategies employed during the eccentric phase. Furthermore, when using the current AEL protocols, eccentric intensities were increased with no greater RPE or soreness.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018706
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100304.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33651736
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Merrigan, Justin J $u Human Performance Innovation Center, Rockefellar Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia $u School of Kinesiology, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia $u Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
245    10
$a Potentiating Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading Are Dependent Upon Relative Strength / $c JJ. Merrigan, JJ. Tufano, MT. Jones
520    9_
$a ABSTRACT: Merrigan, JJ, Tufano, JJ, and Jones, MT. Potentiating effects of accentuated eccentric loading are dependent upon relative strength. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1208-1216, 2021-The purpose was to evaluate the acute effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on bench press velocity and subsequent perceived effort (ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) and soreness. Resistance-trained men (n = 8) and women (n = 2) completed 4 sets of 5 bench press repetitions with AEL and traditional loading (TL) using concentric loads of 50% (AEL50, TL50) and 65% (AEL65, TL65) 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Throughout each TL set, the eccentric load remained identical to the concentric. Variable resistance during the first repetition of AEL equaled 120% 1RM. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to evaluate differences between AEL and TL (p < 0.05). For the first repetition, AEL50 and AEL65 resulted in slower eccentric and concentric velocities. The increasing slope of eccentric and concentric velocity across repetitions was greater during AEL50 and AEL65 compared with TL50 and TL65, respectively (p < 0.05). As an individual's strength increased, AEL50 resulted in slower eccentric velocity and faster concentric velocity than TL50. The AEL65 resulted in faster concentric velocity than TL65 (p < 0.05). Mean protocol comparisons revealed trivial to small effects between AEL and TL. There were no differences in RPE or soreness between protocols with soreness ratings remaining unchanged from baseline (1.80 ± 0.20 AU; p < 0.05). Overall, AEL was not effective for increasing concentric velocity during the bench press with current loading protocols. Yet, stronger individuals may exhibit increases in concentric velocity from AEL, which may be a result of different pacing strategies employed during the eccentric phase. Furthermore, when using the current AEL protocols, eccentric intensities were increased with no greater RPE or soreness.
650    _2
$a terapie cvičením $7 D005081
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a svalová síla $7 D053580
650    _2
$a kosterní svaly $7 D018482
650    _2
$a bolest $7 D010146
650    12
$a odporový trénink $7 D055070
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tufano, James J $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; and
700    1_
$a Jones, Margaret T $u Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia $u School of Sport, Recreation, and Tourism Management, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
773    0_
$w MED00008742 $t Journal of strength and conditioning research $x 1533-4287 $g Roč. 35, č. 5 (2021), s. 1208-1216
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33651736 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100304 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689720 $s 1139152
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 35 $c 5 $d 1208-1216 $e 2021May01 $i 1533-4287 $m Journal of strength and conditioning research $n J Strength Cond Res $x MED00008742
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...