Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The influence of a child's age on the evaluation of smells and their hedonistic assessment

P. Brothánková, J. Vodička, J. Bažant

. 2021 ; 180 (3) : 745-749. [pub] 20200814

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
IGSFZS_2020_001 Univerzity of Pardubice
IGSFZS_2019_002 University of Pardubice

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2012-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago

Olfactory function in children is most commonly evaluated using the odour identification test despite the fact that it is difficult to properly name odorants for young children. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pleasantness rating of odorants by children. The participants were 182 healthy children: the first group included 63 girls and 59 boys (aged 6-7) and the second included 31 girls and 29 boys (aged 11-12). We assessed olfaction using (1) standard method of odorant identification using a U-Sniff test and (2) classifying the hedonic tone of the odorants into 5 categories. The identification test's median differed in younger and older groups of children; the median was 8 and 10 respectively (p < 0.01). The unpleasant hedonic tones were butter, fish and onion. The pleasant hedonic tones were apple, orange and peach. The younger usually categorised hedonic tones as pleasant, compared with the older children, who categorised the odorant's hedonic tones more often as neutral (p < 0.01).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that older children are able to identify odours better than younger ones. The categorisation of hedonic tones differed depending on the subject's age. The younger children tended to categorise odorants as being pleasant and older children as neutral. What is Known: • The test of odour identification is the most popular because it is reliable, practical, rapid and commercially available. • The ability to identify odours improves with age in children. What is New: • The categorisation of hedonic tones differs depending on age. The older children categorise odorants as being neutral significantly more often than younger children do.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019132
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100717.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00431-020-03778-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32797260
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Brothánková, Pavlína $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Pardubice Hospital, Kyjevská, 44, Pardubice, Czech Republic. pavlina.brothankova@upce.cz $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Průmyslová 395, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic. pavlina.brothankova@upce.cz
245    14
$a The influence of a child's age on the evaluation of smells and their hedonistic assessment / $c P. Brothánková, J. Vodička, J. Bažant
520    9_
$a Olfactory function in children is most commonly evaluated using the odour identification test despite the fact that it is difficult to properly name odorants for young children. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pleasantness rating of odorants by children. The participants were 182 healthy children: the first group included 63 girls and 59 boys (aged 6-7) and the second included 31 girls and 29 boys (aged 11-12). We assessed olfaction using (1) standard method of odorant identification using a U-Sniff test and (2) classifying the hedonic tone of the odorants into 5 categories. The identification test's median differed in younger and older groups of children; the median was 8 and 10 respectively (p < 0.01). The unpleasant hedonic tones were butter, fish and onion. The pleasant hedonic tones were apple, orange and peach. The younger usually categorised hedonic tones as pleasant, compared with the older children, who categorised the odorant's hedonic tones more often as neutral (p < 0.01).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that older children are able to identify odours better than younger ones. The categorisation of hedonic tones differed depending on the subject's age. The younger children tended to categorise odorants as being pleasant and older children as neutral. What is Known: • The test of odour identification is the most popular because it is reliable, practical, rapid and commercially available. • The ability to identify odours improves with age in children. What is New: • The categorisation of hedonic tones differs depending on age. The older children categorise odorants as being neutral significantly more often than younger children do.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a kofein $7 D002110
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a emoce $7 D004644
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a motivace $7 D009042
650    12
$a odoranty $x analýza $7 D009812
650    12
$a čich $7 D012903
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vodička, Jan $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Pardubice Hospital, Kyjevská, 44, Pardubice, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Průmyslová 395, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bažant, Jan $u Department of Clinical Psychology, Pardubice Hospital, Kyjevská, 44, Pardubice, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009638 $t European journal of pediatrics $x 1432-1076 $g Roč. 180, č. 3 (2021), s. 745-749
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32797260 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100717 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690048 $s 1139578
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 180 $c 3 $d 745-749 $e 20200814 $i 1432-1076 $m European journal of pediatrics $n Eur J Pediatr $x MED00009638
GRA    __
$a IGSFZS_2020_001 $p Univerzity of Pardubice
GRA    __
$a IGSFZS_2019_002 $p University of Pardubice
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...