Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Vestibular rehabilitation in Europe: a survey of clinical and research practice

D. Meldrum, L. Burrows, O. Cakrt, H. Kerkeni, C. Lopez, F. Tjernstrom, L. Vereeck, O. Zur, K. Jahn

. 2020 ; 267 (Suppl 1) : 24-35. [pub] 20201013

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
01 EO 1401 Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-04-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-04-01 to 1 year ago

Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is practiced across Europe but little in this area has been quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate current VR assessment, treatment, education, and research practices. This was an online, cross-sectional survey with 39 VR specific questions and four sections: demographics, current practice, education, and research. The survey was disseminated through the Dizzynet network to individual therapists through country-specific VR special interest groups. Results were analysed descriptively. A thematic approach was taken to analyse open questions. A total of 471 individuals (median age 41, range 23 - 68 years, 73.4% women), predominately physiotherapists (89.4%) from 20 European countries responded to the survey. They had worked for a median of 4 years (range < 1 - 35) in VR. The majority (58.7%) worked in hospital in-patient or out-patient settings and 21.4% in dedicated VR services. Most respondents specialized in neurology, care of the elderly (geriatrics), or otorhinolaryngology. VR was reported as hard/very hard to access by 48%, with the main barriers to access identified as lack of knowledge of health care professionals (particularly family physicians), lack of trained therapists, and lack of local services. Most respondents reported to know and treat benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV 87.5%), unilateral vestibular hypofunction (75.6%), and cervicogenic dizziness (63%). The use of vestibular assessment equipment varied widely. Over 70% used high-density foam and objective gait speed testing. Over 50% used dynamic visual acuity equipment. Infrared systems, Frenzel lenses, and dynamic posturography were not commonly employed (< 20%). The most frequently used physical outcome measures were the Clinical Test of the Sensory Interaction of Balance, Functional Gait Assessment/Dynamic Gait Index, and Romberg/Tandem Romberg. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, and the Vertigo Symptom Scale were the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures. Adaptation, balance, and habituation exercises were most frequently used (> 80%), with virtual reality used by 15.6%. Over 70% reported knowledge/use of Semont, Epley and Barbeque-Roll manoeuvres for the treatment of BPPV. Most education regarding VR was obtained at post-registration level (89.5%) with only 19% reporting pre-registration education. There was strong (78%) agreement that therapists should have professionally accredited postgraduate certification in VR, with blended learning the most popular mode. Three major research questions were identified for priority: management of specific conditions, effectiveness of VR, and mechanisms/factors influencing vestibular compensation and VR. In summary, the survey quantified current clinical practice in VR across Europe. Knowledge and treatment of common vestibular diseases was high, but use of published subjective and objective outcome measures as well as vestibular assessment varied widely. The results stress the need of improving both training of therapists and standards of care. A European approach, taking advantage of best practices in some countries, seems a reasonable approach.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019744
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830101334.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00415-020-10228-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33048219
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Meldrum, Dara $u Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
245    10
$a Vestibular rehabilitation in Europe: a survey of clinical and research practice / $c D. Meldrum, L. Burrows, O. Cakrt, H. Kerkeni, C. Lopez, F. Tjernstrom, L. Vereeck, O. Zur, K. Jahn
520    9_
$a Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is practiced across Europe but little in this area has been quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate current VR assessment, treatment, education, and research practices. This was an online, cross-sectional survey with 39 VR specific questions and four sections: demographics, current practice, education, and research. The survey was disseminated through the Dizzynet network to individual therapists through country-specific VR special interest groups. Results were analysed descriptively. A thematic approach was taken to analyse open questions. A total of 471 individuals (median age 41, range 23 - 68 years, 73.4% women), predominately physiotherapists (89.4%) from 20 European countries responded to the survey. They had worked for a median of 4 years (range < 1 - 35) in VR. The majority (58.7%) worked in hospital in-patient or out-patient settings and 21.4% in dedicated VR services. Most respondents specialized in neurology, care of the elderly (geriatrics), or otorhinolaryngology. VR was reported as hard/very hard to access by 48%, with the main barriers to access identified as lack of knowledge of health care professionals (particularly family physicians), lack of trained therapists, and lack of local services. Most respondents reported to know and treat benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV 87.5%), unilateral vestibular hypofunction (75.6%), and cervicogenic dizziness (63%). The use of vestibular assessment equipment varied widely. Over 70% used high-density foam and objective gait speed testing. Over 50% used dynamic visual acuity equipment. Infrared systems, Frenzel lenses, and dynamic posturography were not commonly employed (< 20%). The most frequently used physical outcome measures were the Clinical Test of the Sensory Interaction of Balance, Functional Gait Assessment/Dynamic Gait Index, and Romberg/Tandem Romberg. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, and the Vertigo Symptom Scale were the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures. Adaptation, balance, and habituation exercises were most frequently used (> 80%), with virtual reality used by 15.6%. Over 70% reported knowledge/use of Semont, Epley and Barbeque-Roll manoeuvres for the treatment of BPPV. Most education regarding VR was obtained at post-registration level (89.5%) with only 19% reporting pre-registration education. There was strong (78%) agreement that therapists should have professionally accredited postgraduate certification in VR, with blended learning the most popular mode. Three major research questions were identified for priority: management of specific conditions, effectiveness of VR, and mechanisms/factors influencing vestibular compensation and VR. In summary, the survey quantified current clinical practice in VR across Europe. Knowledge and treatment of common vestibular diseases was high, but use of published subjective and objective outcome measures as well as vestibular assessment varied widely. The results stress the need of improving both training of therapists and standards of care. A European approach, taking advantage of best practices in some countries, seems a reasonable approach.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a závrať $7 D004244
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    12
$a vestibulární nemoci $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D015837
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Burrows, Lisa $u Southport and Ormskirk Ear Nose and Throat Balance Clinic Service, Southport, UK
700    1_
$a Cakrt, Ondrej $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kerkeni, Hassen $u Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Lopez, Christophe $u Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, LNSC, Marseille, France
700    1_
$a Tjernstrom, Frederik $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Vereeck, Luc $u Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy/Movant, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
700    1_
$a Zur, Oz $u Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
700    1_
$a Jahn, Klaus $u Department of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling and LMU Munich, Kolbermoorer Strasse 72, 83043, Bad Aibling, Germany. klaus.jahn@med.uni-muenchen.de
773    0_
$w MED00002835 $t Journal of neurology $x 1432-1459 $g Roč. 267, Suppl 1 (2020), s. 24-35
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33048219 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830101334 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690534 $s 1140190
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 267 $c Suppl 1 $d 24-35 $e 20201013 $i 1432-1459 $m Journal of neurology $n J Neurol $x MED00002835
GRA    __
$a 01 EO 1401 $p Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...