-
Something wrong with this record ?
Vestibular rehabilitation in Europe: a survey of clinical and research practice
D. Meldrum, L. Burrows, O. Cakrt, H. Kerkeni, C. Lopez, F. Tjernstrom, L. Vereeck, O. Zur, K. Jahn
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
01 EO 1401
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-04-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-04-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Vestibular Diseases * epidemiology therapy MeSH
- Dizziness * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is practiced across Europe but little in this area has been quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate current VR assessment, treatment, education, and research practices. This was an online, cross-sectional survey with 39 VR specific questions and four sections: demographics, current practice, education, and research. The survey was disseminated through the Dizzynet network to individual therapists through country-specific VR special interest groups. Results were analysed descriptively. A thematic approach was taken to analyse open questions. A total of 471 individuals (median age 41, range 23 - 68 years, 73.4% women), predominately physiotherapists (89.4%) from 20 European countries responded to the survey. They had worked for a median of 4 years (range < 1 - 35) in VR. The majority (58.7%) worked in hospital in-patient or out-patient settings and 21.4% in dedicated VR services. Most respondents specialized in neurology, care of the elderly (geriatrics), or otorhinolaryngology. VR was reported as hard/very hard to access by 48%, with the main barriers to access identified as lack of knowledge of health care professionals (particularly family physicians), lack of trained therapists, and lack of local services. Most respondents reported to know and treat benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV 87.5%), unilateral vestibular hypofunction (75.6%), and cervicogenic dizziness (63%). The use of vestibular assessment equipment varied widely. Over 70% used high-density foam and objective gait speed testing. Over 50% used dynamic visual acuity equipment. Infrared systems, Frenzel lenses, and dynamic posturography were not commonly employed (< 20%). The most frequently used physical outcome measures were the Clinical Test of the Sensory Interaction of Balance, Functional Gait Assessment/Dynamic Gait Index, and Romberg/Tandem Romberg. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, and the Vertigo Symptom Scale were the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures. Adaptation, balance, and habituation exercises were most frequently used (> 80%), with virtual reality used by 15.6%. Over 70% reported knowledge/use of Semont, Epley and Barbeque-Roll manoeuvres for the treatment of BPPV. Most education regarding VR was obtained at post-registration level (89.5%) with only 19% reporting pre-registration education. There was strong (78%) agreement that therapists should have professionally accredited postgraduate certification in VR, with blended learning the most popular mode. Three major research questions were identified for priority: management of specific conditions, effectiveness of VR, and mechanisms/factors influencing vestibular compensation and VR. In summary, the survey quantified current clinical practice in VR across Europe. Knowledge and treatment of common vestibular diseases was high, but use of published subjective and objective outcome measures as well as vestibular assessment varied widely. The results stress the need of improving both training of therapists and standards of care. A European approach, taking advantage of best practices in some countries, seems a reasonable approach.
Academic Unit of Neurology School of Medicine Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Aix Marseille University CNRS LNSC Marseille France
Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beersheba Israel
Department of Neurology Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Lund University Lund Sweden
Southport and Ormskirk Ear Nose and Throat Balance Clinic Service Southport UK
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019744
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101334.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00415-020-10228-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33048219
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Meldrum, Dara $u Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- 245 10
- $a Vestibular rehabilitation in Europe: a survey of clinical and research practice / $c D. Meldrum, L. Burrows, O. Cakrt, H. Kerkeni, C. Lopez, F. Tjernstrom, L. Vereeck, O. Zur, K. Jahn
- 520 9_
- $a Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is practiced across Europe but little in this area has been quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate current VR assessment, treatment, education, and research practices. This was an online, cross-sectional survey with 39 VR specific questions and four sections: demographics, current practice, education, and research. The survey was disseminated through the Dizzynet network to individual therapists through country-specific VR special interest groups. Results were analysed descriptively. A thematic approach was taken to analyse open questions. A total of 471 individuals (median age 41, range 23 - 68 years, 73.4% women), predominately physiotherapists (89.4%) from 20 European countries responded to the survey. They had worked for a median of 4 years (range < 1 - 35) in VR. The majority (58.7%) worked in hospital in-patient or out-patient settings and 21.4% in dedicated VR services. Most respondents specialized in neurology, care of the elderly (geriatrics), or otorhinolaryngology. VR was reported as hard/very hard to access by 48%, with the main barriers to access identified as lack of knowledge of health care professionals (particularly family physicians), lack of trained therapists, and lack of local services. Most respondents reported to know and treat benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV 87.5%), unilateral vestibular hypofunction (75.6%), and cervicogenic dizziness (63%). The use of vestibular assessment equipment varied widely. Over 70% used high-density foam and objective gait speed testing. Over 50% used dynamic visual acuity equipment. Infrared systems, Frenzel lenses, and dynamic posturography were not commonly employed (< 20%). The most frequently used physical outcome measures were the Clinical Test of the Sensory Interaction of Balance, Functional Gait Assessment/Dynamic Gait Index, and Romberg/Tandem Romberg. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, and the Vertigo Symptom Scale were the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures. Adaptation, balance, and habituation exercises were most frequently used (> 80%), with virtual reality used by 15.6%. Over 70% reported knowledge/use of Semont, Epley and Barbeque-Roll manoeuvres for the treatment of BPPV. Most education regarding VR was obtained at post-registration level (89.5%) with only 19% reporting pre-registration education. There was strong (78%) agreement that therapists should have professionally accredited postgraduate certification in VR, with blended learning the most popular mode. Three major research questions were identified for priority: management of specific conditions, effectiveness of VR, and mechanisms/factors influencing vestibular compensation and VR. In summary, the survey quantified current clinical practice in VR across Europe. Knowledge and treatment of common vestibular diseases was high, but use of published subjective and objective outcome measures as well as vestibular assessment varied widely. The results stress the need of improving both training of therapists and standards of care. A European approach, taking advantage of best practices in some countries, seems a reasonable approach.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 12
- $a závrať $7 D004244
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 12
- $a vestibulární nemoci $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D015837
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Burrows, Lisa $u Southport and Ormskirk Ear Nose and Throat Balance Clinic Service, Southport, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Cakrt, Ondrej $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kerkeni, Hassen $u Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Lopez, Christophe $u Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, LNSC, Marseille, France
- 700 1_
- $a Tjernstrom, Frederik $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Vereeck, Luc $u Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy/Movant, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Zur, Oz $u Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
- 700 1_
- $a Jahn, Klaus $u Department of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling and LMU Munich, Kolbermoorer Strasse 72, 83043, Bad Aibling, Germany. klaus.jahn@med.uni-muenchen.de
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002835 $t Journal of neurology $x 1432-1459 $g Roč. 267, Suppl 1 (2020), s. 24-35
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33048219 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101334 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690534 $s 1140190
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 267 $c Suppl 1 $d 24-35 $e 20201013 $i 1432-1459 $m Journal of neurology $n J Neurol $x MED00002835
- GRA __
- $a 01 EO 1401 $p Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728