Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Machine learning volumetry of ischemic brain lesions on CT after thrombectomy-prospective diagnostic accuracy study in ischemic stroke patients

J. Kral, M. Cabal, L. Kasickova, J. Havelka, T. Jonszta, O. Volny, M. Bar

. 2020 ; 62 (10) : 1239-1245. [pub] 20200422

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Observational Study

Grant support
FNOs/2018 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: Ischemic lesion volume (ILV) is an important radiological predictor of functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation stroke. Our aim was to assess the agreement between automated ILV measurements on NCCT using the Brainomix software and manual ILV measurements on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: This was a prospective single-center observational study of patients with CT angiography (CTA) proven anterior circulation occlusion treated with endovascular thrombectomy (May 2018 to May 2019). NCCT ILV was measured automatically by the Brainomix software. DWI ILV was measured manually. The McNemar's test was used to test sensitivity and specificity. The Somer's delta was used to test the differences between concordant and discordant ASPECTS regions. The Bland-Altman plot was calculated to compare the differences between Brainomix and DWI ILVs. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Median Brainomix ILV was 23 ml (interquartile range [IQR], 15-39 ml), and median DWI ILV was 11.5 ml (IQR, 7-32 ml) in the TICI 2b-3 group. In the TICI 0-2a, the NCCT ILV was 39 ml (IQR, 18-62 ml) and DWI ILV was 30 (IQR, 11-105 ml). The DWI ILVs in patients with good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) was significantly lower compared with patients with mRS ≥ 3 (10 mL vs 59 mL, p = 0.002). Similar trend was observed for Brainomix ILV measurements (21 mL vs 39 mL, p = 0.012). There was a high correlation and accuracy in the detection of follow-up ischemic changes in particular ASPECTS regions. CONCLUSION: NCCT ILV measured automatically by the Brainomix software might be considered a valuable radiological outcome measure.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020076
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830101702.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00234-020-02419-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32318775
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kral, Jiri $u Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Machine learning volumetry of ischemic brain lesions on CT after thrombectomy-prospective diagnostic accuracy study in ischemic stroke patients / $c J. Kral, M. Cabal, L. Kasickova, J. Havelka, T. Jonszta, O. Volny, M. Bar
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Ischemic lesion volume (ILV) is an important radiological predictor of functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation stroke. Our aim was to assess the agreement between automated ILV measurements on NCCT using the Brainomix software and manual ILV measurements on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: This was a prospective single-center observational study of patients with CT angiography (CTA) proven anterior circulation occlusion treated with endovascular thrombectomy (May 2018 to May 2019). NCCT ILV was measured automatically by the Brainomix software. DWI ILV was measured manually. The McNemar's test was used to test sensitivity and specificity. The Somer's delta was used to test the differences between concordant and discordant ASPECTS regions. The Bland-Altman plot was calculated to compare the differences between Brainomix and DWI ILVs. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Median Brainomix ILV was 23 ml (interquartile range [IQR], 15-39 ml), and median DWI ILV was 11.5 ml (IQR, 7-32 ml) in the TICI 2b-3 group. In the TICI 0-2a, the NCCT ILV was 39 ml (IQR, 18-62 ml) and DWI ILV was 30 (IQR, 11-105 ml). The DWI ILVs in patients with good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) was significantly lower compared with patients with mRS ≥ 3 (10 mL vs 59 mL, p = 0.002). Similar trend was observed for Brainomix ILV measurements (21 mL vs 39 mL, p = 0.012). There was a high correlation and accuracy in the detection of follow-up ischemic changes in particular ASPECTS regions. CONCLUSION: NCCT ILV measured automatically by the Brainomix software might be considered a valuable radiological outcome measure.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a mozková angiografie $x metody $7 D002533
650    _2
$a CT angiografie $x metody $7 D000072226
650    _2
$a difuzní magnetická rezonance $7 D038524
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ischemická cévní mozková příhoda $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000083242
650    12
$a strojové učení $7 D000069550
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a rentgenový obraz - interpretace počítačová $x metody $7 D011857
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
650    12
$a trombektomie $7 D017131
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Cabal, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kasickova, Linda $u Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Havelka, Jaroslav $u Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jonszta, Tomas $u Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Volny, Ondrej $u International Clinical Research Centre, Stroke Research Program, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bar, Michal $u Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic. michal.bar@fno.cz $u Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. michal.bar@fno.cz
773    0_
$w MED00003503 $t Neuroradiology $x 1432-1920 $g Roč. 62, č. 10 (2020), s. 1239-1245
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32318775 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830101702 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690796 $s 1140522
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 62 $c 10 $d 1239-1245 $e 20200422 $i 1432-1920 $m Neuroradiology $n Neuroradiology $x MED00003503
GRA    __
$a FNOs/2018 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...