Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes

V. Kováčik, M. Maciak, V. Baláž, J. Babeľa, V. Kubas, P. Bujdák, P. Beňo

. 2020 ; 38 (8) : 1933-1941. [pub] 20191015

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-02-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: Anterior and posterior reconstructions of pelvic structures are used during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to obtain better continence outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS), a novel postprostatectomy reconstruction technique. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, controlled, partially randomized and blinded experiment. The statistical analysis was based on the generalized linear modeling (GLM) framework with random effects: the logit link was used to model the probability of achieving continence and the logarithmic link was used to evaluate the overall score of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The significance of the fixed effects and all possible two-way interactions was tested using the critical level of 0.05. RESULTS: The probability of achieving the continence significantly depends on the neurovascular bundle sparing (p < 0.001) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). Analogously, the expected ICIQ-SF score significantly depends on the nerve-sparing status (p = 0.035) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference between the unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing was found. The ARVUS technique seems to perform slightly worse with respect to the expected continence, but this difference is within the margins of random fluctuations (p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates a significant positive association between the nerve-sparing approach and the patient's continence, however, regardless of the unilateral or bilateral approach. In terms of the continence rate, no statistically significant benefits of ARVUS were observed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020331
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102042.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-019-02975-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31616979
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kováčik, Viktor $u 2nd Urology department of Slovak Medical University, F.D. Roosevelt hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. viktor.kovacik@gmail.com $u Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia. viktor.kovacik@gmail.com
245    10
$a Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes / $c V. Kováčik, M. Maciak, V. Baláž, J. Babeľa, V. Kubas, P. Bujdák, P. Beňo
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Anterior and posterior reconstructions of pelvic structures are used during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to obtain better continence outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS), a novel postprostatectomy reconstruction technique. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, controlled, partially randomized and blinded experiment. The statistical analysis was based on the generalized linear modeling (GLM) framework with random effects: the logit link was used to model the probability of achieving continence and the logarithmic link was used to evaluate the overall score of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The significance of the fixed effects and all possible two-way interactions was tested using the critical level of 0.05. RESULTS: The probability of achieving the continence significantly depends on the neurovascular bundle sparing (p < 0.001) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). Analogously, the expected ICIQ-SF score significantly depends on the nerve-sparing status (p = 0.035) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference between the unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing was found. The ARVUS technique seems to perform slightly worse with respect to the expected continence, but this difference is within the margins of random fluctuations (p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates a significant positive association between the nerve-sparing approach and the patient's continence, however, regardless of the unilateral or bilateral approach. In terms of the continence rate, no statistically significant benefits of ARVUS were observed.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a anastomóza chirurgická $x metody $7 D000714
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a prostatektomie $x metody $7 D011468
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x chirurgie $7 D011471
650    12
$a roboticky asistované výkony $7 D065287
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a uretra $x chirurgie $7 D014521
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $x chirurgie $7 D001743
650    _2
$a inkontinence moči $x epidemiologie $7 D014549
650    _2
$a urologické chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D013520
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Maciak, Matúš $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Baláž, Vladimír $u 2nd Urology department of Slovak Medical University, F.D. Roosevelt hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Babeľa, Jozef $u 2nd Urology department of Slovak Medical University, F.D. Roosevelt hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Kubas, Viliam $u 2nd Urology department of Slovak Medical University, F.D. Roosevelt hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Bujdák, Peter $u Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia $u Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Beňo, Peter $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Military and Faculty Hospital, Ružomberok, Slovakia
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 38, č. 8 (2020), s. 1933-1941
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31616979 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102042 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691000 $s 1140777
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 38 $c 8 $d 1933-1941 $e 20191015 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...