Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Multiparametric Quantitative Brain MRI in Neurological and Hepatic Forms of Wilson's Disease

M. Dezortova, A. Lescinskij, P. Dusek, V. Herynek, J. Acosta-Cabronero, R. Bruha, F. Jiru, SD. Robinson, M. Hajek

. 2020 ; 51 (6) : 1829-1835. [pub] 20191111

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020515

Grantová podpora
NV15-25602A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2012-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content od 1999 do Před 5 lety

BACKGROUND: In Wilson's disease (WD), demyelination, rarefaction, gliosis, and iron accumulation in the deep gray matter cause opposing effects on T2 -weighted MR signal. However, the degree and interplay of these changes in chronically treated WD patients has not been quantitatively studied. PURPOSE: To compare differences in brain multiparametric mapping between controls and chronically treated WD patients with neurological (neuro-WD) and hepatic (hep-WD) forms to infer the nature of residual WD neuropathology. STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight WD patients (28 neuro-WD, 10 hep-WD); 26 healthy controls. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T: susceptibility, T2 *, T2 , T1 relaxometry; 1.5T: T2 , T1 relaxometry. ASSESSMENT: The following 3D regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented: globus pallidus, putamen, caudate nucleus, and thalamus. Mean bulk magnetic susceptibility, T2 *, T2 , and T1 relaxation times were calculated for each ROI. STATISTICAL TESTS: The effect of group (neuro-WD, hep-WD, controls) and age was assessed using a generalized least squares model with different variance for each ROI and quantitative parameter. A general linear hypothesis test with Tukey adjustment was used for post-hoc between-group analysis; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Susceptibility values were higher in all ROIs in neuro-WD compared to controls and hep-WD (P < 0.001). In basal ganglia, lower T2 and T2 * were found in neuro-WD compared to controls (P < 0.01) and hep-WD (P < 0.05) at 3.0T. Much smaller intergroup differences for T2 in basal ganglia were observed at 1.5T compared to 3.0T. In the thalamus, increased susceptibility in neuro-WD was accompanied by increased T1 at both field strengths (P < 0.001 to both groups), and an increased T2 at 1.5T only (P < 0.001 to both groups). DATA CONCLUSION: We observed significant residual brain MRI abnormalities in neuro-WD but not in hep-WD patients on chronic anticopper treatment. Patterns of changes were suggestive of iron accumulation in the basal ganglia and demyelination in the thalamus; 3.0T was more sensitive for detection of the former and 1.5T of the latter abnormality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1829-1835.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020515
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102153.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jmri.26984 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31710776
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Dezortova, Monika $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Multiparametric Quantitative Brain MRI in Neurological and Hepatic Forms of Wilson's Disease / $c M. Dezortova, A. Lescinskij, P. Dusek, V. Herynek, J. Acosta-Cabronero, R. Bruha, F. Jiru, SD. Robinson, M. Hajek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In Wilson's disease (WD), demyelination, rarefaction, gliosis, and iron accumulation in the deep gray matter cause opposing effects on T2 -weighted MR signal. However, the degree and interplay of these changes in chronically treated WD patients has not been quantitatively studied. PURPOSE: To compare differences in brain multiparametric mapping between controls and chronically treated WD patients with neurological (neuro-WD) and hepatic (hep-WD) forms to infer the nature of residual WD neuropathology. STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight WD patients (28 neuro-WD, 10 hep-WD); 26 healthy controls. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T: susceptibility, T2 *, T2 , T1 relaxometry; 1.5T: T2 , T1 relaxometry. ASSESSMENT: The following 3D regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented: globus pallidus, putamen, caudate nucleus, and thalamus. Mean bulk magnetic susceptibility, T2 *, T2 , and T1 relaxation times were calculated for each ROI. STATISTICAL TESTS: The effect of group (neuro-WD, hep-WD, controls) and age was assessed using a generalized least squares model with different variance for each ROI and quantitative parameter. A general linear hypothesis test with Tukey adjustment was used for post-hoc between-group analysis; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Susceptibility values were higher in all ROIs in neuro-WD compared to controls and hep-WD (P < 0.001). In basal ganglia, lower T2 and T2 * were found in neuro-WD compared to controls (P < 0.01) and hep-WD (P < 0.05) at 3.0T. Much smaller intergroup differences for T2 in basal ganglia were observed at 1.5T compared to 3.0T. In the thalamus, increased susceptibility in neuro-WD was accompanied by increased T1 at both field strengths (P < 0.001 to both groups), and an increased T2 at 1.5T only (P < 0.001 to both groups). DATA CONCLUSION: We observed significant residual brain MRI abnormalities in neuro-WD but not in hep-WD patients on chronic anticopper treatment. Patterns of changes were suggestive of iron accumulation in the basal ganglia and demyelination in the thalamus; 3.0T was more sensitive for detection of the former and 1.5T of the latter abnormality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1829-1835.
650    _2
$a mozek $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001921
650    _2
$a mapování mozku $7 D001931
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a hepatolentikulární degenerace $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006527
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Lescinskij, Artem $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dusek, Petr $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Herynek, Vit $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Center for Advanced Preclinical Imaging, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Acosta-Cabronero, Julio $u Tenoke Ltd, Cambridge, UK
700    1_
$a Bruha, Radan $u Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jiru, Filip $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Robinson, Simon D $u High Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Hajek, Milan $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00004911 $t Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI $x 1522-2586 $g Roč. 51, č. 6 (2020), s. 1829-1835
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31710776 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102153 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691148 $s 1140961
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 51 $c 6 $d 1829-1835 $e 20191111 $i 1522-2586 $m Journal of magnetic resonance imaging $n J Magn Reson Imaging $x MED00004911
GRA    __
$a NV15-25602A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...