Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Reliability and Validity of the Czech Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients with Sleep Disorders and Healthy Controls

D. Manková, D. Dudysová, J. Novák, E. Fárková, K. Janků, M. Kliková, J. Bušková, A. Bartoš, K. Šonka, J. Kopřivová

. 2021 ; 2021 (-) : 5576348. [pub] 20210810

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025138

Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-CZ) have been evaluated only in patients with chronic insomnia, and thus, it is unclear whether PSQI-CZ is suitable for use in other clinical and nonclinical populations. This study was aimed at examining the validity and reliability of the PSQI-CZ and at assessing whether the unidimensional or multidimensional scoring of the instrument would be recommended. Methods: A total of 524 adult subjects from the Czech population participated in the study. The internal consistency of PSQI was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. The known-group validity was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis H test to verify the difference between patients with sleep disorders and healthy control sample. For testing the structural validity, a cross-validation approach was used with both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For EFA, the maximum likelihood method with direct oblimin rotation and parallel analysis was used. Results: The internal consistency of PSQI-CZ items was moderate (α = 0.75). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed high specificity (0.79) and moderate sensitivity (0.64) using an optimal cut-off score of 10. The EFA revealed a 3-factor structure with factors labelled as "sleep duration and efficiency," "sleep disturbances and quality," and "sleep latency." The CFA showed that the emerged 3-factor model had a partly acceptable fit, which was better than other previously supported models. Conclusions: A high cut-off score of 10 is recommended to define poor sleep quality. Given the inconsistency of structural analyses, alternative scoring was not recommended. However, the individual components in addition to a total score should be interpreted when assessing sleep quality. We recommend editing and verifying the PSQI-CZ translation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025138
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026134105.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1155/2021/5576348 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34423035
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Manková, Denisa $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Reliability and Validity of the Czech Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients with Sleep Disorders and Healthy Controls / $c D. Manková, D. Dudysová, J. Novák, E. Fárková, K. Janků, M. Kliková, J. Bušková, A. Bartoš, K. Šonka, J. Kopřivová
520    9_
$a Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-CZ) have been evaluated only in patients with chronic insomnia, and thus, it is unclear whether PSQI-CZ is suitable for use in other clinical and nonclinical populations. This study was aimed at examining the validity and reliability of the PSQI-CZ and at assessing whether the unidimensional or multidimensional scoring of the instrument would be recommended. Methods: A total of 524 adult subjects from the Czech population participated in the study. The internal consistency of PSQI was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. The known-group validity was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis H test to verify the difference between patients with sleep disorders and healthy control sample. For testing the structural validity, a cross-validation approach was used with both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For EFA, the maximum likelihood method with direct oblimin rotation and parallel analysis was used. Results: The internal consistency of PSQI-CZ items was moderate (α = 0.75). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed high specificity (0.79) and moderate sensitivity (0.64) using an optimal cut-off score of 10. The EFA revealed a 3-factor structure with factors labelled as "sleep duration and efficiency," "sleep disturbances and quality," and "sleep latency." The CFA showed that the emerged 3-factor model had a partly acceptable fit, which was better than other previously supported models. Conclusions: A high cut-off score of 10 is recommended to define poor sleep quality. Given the inconsistency of structural analyses, alternative scoring was not recommended. However, the individual components in addition to a total score should be interpreted when assessing sleep quality. We recommend editing and verifying the PSQI-CZ translation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a psychometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D011594
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a poruchy spánku a bdění $x psychologie $7 D012893
650    _2
$a překládání $7 D014175
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dudysová, Daniela $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Novák, Jan $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, 128 21 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fárková, Eva $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Janků, Karolina $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kliková, Monika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bušková, Jitka $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Aleš $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šonka, Karel $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, 128 21 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kopřivová, Jana $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2021, č. - (2021), s. 5576348
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34423035 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026134111 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714266 $s 1145645
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 2021 $c - $d 5576348 $e 20210810 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options