• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The real UVB photoprotective efficacy of vegetable oils: in vitro and in vivo studies

A. Ácsová, J. Hojerová, L. Janotková, H. Bendová, L. Jedličková, V. Hamranová, S. Martiniaková

. 2021 ; 20 (1) : 139-151. [pub] 20210119

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026305

Grantová podpora
1671 Young Research Support Program/ Excellent Team of STU, Slovak Republic
APVV-16-0088 Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
1/0012/19 Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000860 ERDF/ESF project "International competitiveness of NIPH in research, development and education in alternative toxicological methods"
75010330 Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky - Conceptual development of research organization (National Institute of Public Health - NIPH)
1846/2020 Young Research Program, grant STU VEFARO

Some vegetable oils are currently being promoted as a safe alternative to commercial sunscreens. The true UVB photoprotective efficacy of 14 virgin vegetable oils and the suitability of the dilution method for determining their SPF value were evaluated. Oils and standard sunscreens were investigated in vitro by the Mansur's method in Slovakia and in vivo by the ISO method in the Czech Republic. SPF values in vitro (0.1; 0.0; 0.4; 0.2 and 0.2) and in vivo (2.5; 1.2; 2.6; 2.6; and 2.8) of the five most promoted oils (from carrot seed, coconut, raspberry seed, rosehip seed, and wheat germ) were significantly lower than the values reported in the controversial studies. We have shown that the overestimated SPF values of these oils were determined by authors who did not strictly follow Mansur's original methodology. The other eight vegetable oils also provide no or negligible SPF values. Only the in vitro SPF value of 11.2 tamanu oil is worth mentioning, probably due to high proportion of calophyllolides. In vitro and in vivo SPF ratios from 1.14 to 0.94 obtained by two methods in two laboratories for six commercial sunscreen oils used as controls confirm the correctness of performing the Mansur's method in this study. However, this dilution method has proven to be fundamentally flawed in determining the SPF value of substances with such negligible photoprotection as most vegetable oils can provide. An SPF value of less than 1, which can be determined by this Mansur's method, is physiologically impossible and meaningless.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026305
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133019.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s43630-020-00009-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33721242
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Ácsová, Aneta $u Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Laboratories of Cosmetology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
245    14
$a The real UVB photoprotective efficacy of vegetable oils: in vitro and in vivo studies / $c A. Ácsová, J. Hojerová, L. Janotková, H. Bendová, L. Jedličková, V. Hamranová, S. Martiniaková
520    9_
$a Some vegetable oils are currently being promoted as a safe alternative to commercial sunscreens. The true UVB photoprotective efficacy of 14 virgin vegetable oils and the suitability of the dilution method for determining their SPF value were evaluated. Oils and standard sunscreens were investigated in vitro by the Mansur's method in Slovakia and in vivo by the ISO method in the Czech Republic. SPF values in vitro (0.1; 0.0; 0.4; 0.2 and 0.2) and in vivo (2.5; 1.2; 2.6; 2.6; and 2.8) of the five most promoted oils (from carrot seed, coconut, raspberry seed, rosehip seed, and wheat germ) were significantly lower than the values reported in the controversial studies. We have shown that the overestimated SPF values of these oils were determined by authors who did not strictly follow Mansur's original methodology. The other eight vegetable oils also provide no or negligible SPF values. Only the in vitro SPF value of 11.2 tamanu oil is worth mentioning, probably due to high proportion of calophyllolides. In vitro and in vivo SPF ratios from 1.14 to 0.94 obtained by two methods in two laboratories for six commercial sunscreen oils used as controls confirm the correctness of performing the Mansur's method in this study. However, this dilution method has proven to be fundamentally flawed in determining the SPF value of substances with such negligible photoprotection as most vegetable oils can provide. An SPF value of less than 1, which can be determined by this Mansur's method, is physiologically impossible and meaningless.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a benzimidazoly $x chemie $7 D001562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a oleje rostlin $x chemie $7 D010938
650    _2
$a Rubus $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D065856
650    _2
$a semena rostlinná $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D012639
650    _2
$a kůže $x účinky záření $7 D012867
650    _2
$a ochranný sluneční faktor $7 D059405
650    _2
$a přípravky chránící proti slunci $x chemie $7 D013473
650    12
$a ultrafialové záření $7 D014466
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hojerová, Jarmila $u Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Laboratories of Cosmetology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia. jarmila.hojerova@stuba.sk
700    1_
$a Janotková, Lívia $u Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Laboratories of Cosmetology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Bendová, Hana $u The National Institute of Public Health in Prague, Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Reference Centre for Cosmetics, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jedličková, Lucie $u The National Institute of Public Health in Prague, Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Reference Centre for Cosmetics, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hamranová, Veronika $u Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Laboratories of Cosmetology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Martiniaková, Silvia $u Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Laboratories of Cosmetology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
773    0_
$w MED00169255 $t Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology $x 1474-9092 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2021), s. 139-151
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33721242 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133025 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715123 $s 1146812
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 20 $c 1 $d 139-151 $e 20210119 $i 1474-9092 $m Photochemical & photobiological sciences $n Protochem. photobiol. sci. $x MED00169255
GRA    __
$a 1671 $p Young Research Support Program/ Excellent Team of STU, Slovak Republic
GRA    __
$a APVV-16-0088 $p Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
GRA    __
$a 1/0012/19 $p Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000860 $p ERDF/ESF project "International competitiveness of NIPH in research, development and education in alternative toxicological methods"
GRA    __
$a 75010330 $p Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky - Conceptual development of research organization (National Institute of Public Health - NIPH)
GRA    __
$a 1846/2020 $p Young Research Program, grant STU VEFARO
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...