-
Something wrong with this record ?
Vaginal birth after Cesarean section and levator ani avulsion: a case-control study
L. Paymova, K. Svabik, A. Neumann, V. Kalis, KM. Ismail, Z. Rusavy
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787
European Regional Development Fund
918119
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
PubMed
33724564
DOI
10.1002/uog.23629
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anal Canal diagnostic imaging injuries MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Obstetric Labor Complications diagnostic imaging etiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Soft Tissue Injuries diagnostic imaging etiology MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal * MeSH
- Vaginal Birth after Cesarean adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and enlargement of the levator hiatus following vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) in comparison with vaginal delivery in primiparous women. METHODS: In this two-center observational case-control study, we identified all women who had a term VBAC for their second delivery at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and the 1st Faculty of Medicine in Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic, between 2012 and 2016. Women with a repeat VBAC, preterm birth or stillbirth were excluded from the study. As a control group, we enrolled a cohort of primiparous women who delivered vaginally during the study period. To increase our control sample, we also invited all primiparous women who delivered vaginally in both participating units between May and June 2019 to participate. All participants were invited for a four-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound scan to assess LAM trauma. LAM avulsion and the area of the levator hiatus were assessed offline from the stored pelvic floor volumes obtained at rest, during maximum contraction and during Valsalva maneuver. The laterality of the avulsion was also noted. The cohorts were then compared using the χ2 test and Wilcoxon's two-sample test according to the normality of the distribution. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate regression analysis, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 356 women had a VBAC for their second delivery during the study period. Of these, 152 (42.7%) attended the ultrasound examination and full data were available for statistical analysis for 141 women. The control group comprised 113 primiparous women. A significant difference was observed between the VBAC group and the control group in age (32.7 vs 30.1 years; P < 0.05), BMI (28.4 vs 27.4 kg/m2 ; P < 0.05) and duration of the first and second stages of labor (293.1 vs 345.9 min; P < 0.05 and 27.6 vs 35.3 min; P < 0.05, respectively) at the time of the index birth. The LAM avulsion rate was significantly higher in the VBAC compared with the control group (32.6% vs 18.6%; P = 0.01). The difference between the groups was observed predominantly in the rate of unilateral avulsion and remained significant after controlling for age and BMI (adjusted odds ratio 2.061 (95% CI, 1.103-3.852)). There was no statistically significant difference in the area of the levator hiatus at rest (12.0 vs 12.6 cm2 ; P = 0.28) or on maximum Valsalva maneuver (18.6 vs 18.7 cm2 ; P = 0.55) between the VBAC and control groups. The incidence of levator hiatal ballooning was comparable between the groups (17.7% and 18.6%; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: VBAC is associated with a significantly higher rate of LAM avulsion than is vaginal birth in nulliparous women. The difference was significant even after controlling for age and BMI. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004043
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145618.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/uog.23629 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33724564
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Paymova, L $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Vaginal birth after Cesarean section and levator ani avulsion: a case-control study / $c L. Paymova, K. Svabik, A. Neumann, V. Kalis, KM. Ismail, Z. Rusavy
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and enlargement of the levator hiatus following vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) in comparison with vaginal delivery in primiparous women. METHODS: In this two-center observational case-control study, we identified all women who had a term VBAC for their second delivery at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and the 1st Faculty of Medicine in Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic, between 2012 and 2016. Women with a repeat VBAC, preterm birth or stillbirth were excluded from the study. As a control group, we enrolled a cohort of primiparous women who delivered vaginally during the study period. To increase our control sample, we also invited all primiparous women who delivered vaginally in both participating units between May and June 2019 to participate. All participants were invited for a four-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound scan to assess LAM trauma. LAM avulsion and the area of the levator hiatus were assessed offline from the stored pelvic floor volumes obtained at rest, during maximum contraction and during Valsalva maneuver. The laterality of the avulsion was also noted. The cohorts were then compared using the χ2 test and Wilcoxon's two-sample test according to the normality of the distribution. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate regression analysis, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 356 women had a VBAC for their second delivery during the study period. Of these, 152 (42.7%) attended the ultrasound examination and full data were available for statistical analysis for 141 women. The control group comprised 113 primiparous women. A significant difference was observed between the VBAC group and the control group in age (32.7 vs 30.1 years; P < 0.05), BMI (28.4 vs 27.4 kg/m2 ; P < 0.05) and duration of the first and second stages of labor (293.1 vs 345.9 min; P < 0.05 and 27.6 vs 35.3 min; P < 0.05, respectively) at the time of the index birth. The LAM avulsion rate was significantly higher in the VBAC compared with the control group (32.6% vs 18.6%; P = 0.01). The difference between the groups was observed predominantly in the rate of unilateral avulsion and remained significant after controlling for age and BMI (adjusted odds ratio 2.061 (95% CI, 1.103-3.852)). There was no statistically significant difference in the area of the levator hiatus at rest (12.0 vs 12.6 cm2 ; P = 0.28) or on maximum Valsalva maneuver (18.6 vs 18.7 cm2 ; P = 0.55) between the VBAC and control groups. The incidence of levator hiatal ballooning was comparable between the groups (17.7% and 18.6%; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: VBAC is associated with a significantly higher rate of LAM avulsion than is vaginal birth in nulliparous women. The difference was significant even after controlling for age and BMI. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a anální kanál $x diagnostické zobrazování $x zranění $7 D001003
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a komplikace porodu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $7 D007744
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a poranění měkkých tkání $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $7 D017695
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie prenatální $7 D016216
- 650 _2
- $a vaginální porod po císařském řezu $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016064
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Svabik, K $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Neumann, A $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kalis, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ismail, K M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rusavy, Z $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 58, č. 2 (2021), s. 303-308
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33724564 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145614 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751492 $s 1155192
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 58 $c 2 $d 303-308 $e 20210712 $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 $p European Regional Development Fund
- GRA __
- $a 918119 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113