-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Occupational exposure to nanoparticles originating from welding - case studies from the Czech Republic
F. Berger, Š. Bernatíková, L. Kocůrková, R. Přichystalová, L. Schreiberová
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
ProQuest Central
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2004-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
33835113
DOI
10.13075/mp.5893.01058
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- inhalační expozice analýza MeSH
- látky znečišťující vzduch v pracovním prostředí * analýza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí MeSH
- nanočástice * MeSH
- pracovní expozice * analýza MeSH
- svařování * MeSH
- velikost částic MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials are virtually ubiquitous as they are created by both natural processes and human activities. The amount of occupational exposure to unintentionally released nanoparticles can, therefore, be substantial. The aim of the study was to determine the concentrations of incidental nanoparticles that workers can be exposed to during welding operations and to assess related health risks. The specific focus on welding operations was determined based on the fact that other case studies on the manufacturing industry confirm significant exposure to incidental nanoparticles during welding. In the Czech Republic, 92% of all industrial workers are employed in the manufacturing industry, where welding operations are amply represented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The particle number concentrations of particles in the size range of 20-1000 nm and particle mass concentrations of inhalable and PM1 fractions were determined via measurements carried out at 15-minute intervals for each welding operation by static sampling in close proximity to the worker. Measurements were obtained using the following instruments: NanoScan SMPS 3910, Optical Particle Sizer OPS 3330, P-TRAK 8525 and DustTrak DRX 8534. The assessed operations were manual arc welding and automatic welding. RESULTS: The observed average particle number concentrations for electric arc welders ranged 84×103-176×103 #/cm3, for welding machine operators 96×103-147×103 #/cm3, and for a welding locksmith the obtained average concentration was 179×103 #/cm3. The determined average mass concentration of PM1 particles ranged 0.45-1.4 mg/m3. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the conducted measurements, it was confirmed that there is a significant number of incidental nanoparticles released during welding operations in the manufacturing industry as a part of production and processing of metal products. The recommended occupational exposure limits for nanoparticle number concentrations were exceeded approximately 4-8 times for all assessed welding operations. The use of local exhaust ventilation in conjunction with personal protective equipment, including FFP2 or FFP3 particle filters, for welding is, therefore, recommended. Med Pr. 2021;72(3):219-30.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004172
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145449.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.13075/mp.5893.01058 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33835113
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Berger, Filip $u VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (Faculty of Safety Engineering)
- 245 10
- $a Occupational exposure to nanoparticles originating from welding - case studies from the Czech Republic / $c F. Berger, Š. Bernatíková, L. Kocůrková, R. Přichystalová, L. Schreiberová
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials are virtually ubiquitous as they are created by both natural processes and human activities. The amount of occupational exposure to unintentionally released nanoparticles can, therefore, be substantial. The aim of the study was to determine the concentrations of incidental nanoparticles that workers can be exposed to during welding operations and to assess related health risks. The specific focus on welding operations was determined based on the fact that other case studies on the manufacturing industry confirm significant exposure to incidental nanoparticles during welding. In the Czech Republic, 92% of all industrial workers are employed in the manufacturing industry, where welding operations are amply represented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The particle number concentrations of particles in the size range of 20-1000 nm and particle mass concentrations of inhalable and PM1 fractions were determined via measurements carried out at 15-minute intervals for each welding operation by static sampling in close proximity to the worker. Measurements were obtained using the following instruments: NanoScan SMPS 3910, Optical Particle Sizer OPS 3330, P-TRAK 8525 and DustTrak DRX 8534. The assessed operations were manual arc welding and automatic welding. RESULTS: The observed average particle number concentrations for electric arc welders ranged 84×103-176×103 #/cm3, for welding machine operators 96×103-147×103 #/cm3, and for a welding locksmith the obtained average concentration was 179×103 #/cm3. The determined average mass concentration of PM1 particles ranged 0.45-1.4 mg/m3. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the conducted measurements, it was confirmed that there is a significant number of incidental nanoparticles released during welding operations in the manufacturing industry as a part of production and processing of metal products. The recommended occupational exposure limits for nanoparticle number concentrations were exceeded approximately 4-8 times for all assessed welding operations. The use of local exhaust ventilation in conjunction with personal protective equipment, including FFP2 or FFP3 particle filters, for welding is, therefore, recommended. Med Pr. 2021;72(3):219-30.
- 650 12
- $a látky znečišťující vzduch v pracovním prostředí $x analýza $7 D000395
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a inhalační expozice $x analýza $7 D019570
- 650 12
- $a nanočástice $7 D053758
- 650 12
- $a pracovní expozice $x analýza $7 D016273
- 650 _2
- $a velikost částic $7 D010316
- 650 12
- $a svařování $7 D014896
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bernatíková, Šárka $u VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (Faculty of Safety Engineering)
- 700 1_
- $a Kocůrková, Lucie $u VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (Faculty of Safety Engineering)
- 700 1_
- $a Přichystalová, Radka $u VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (Faculty of Safety Engineering)
- 700 1_
- $a Schreiberová, Lenka $u VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic (Faculty of Safety Engineering)
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003320 $t Medycyna pracy $x 2353-1339 $g Roč. 72, č. 3 (2021), s. 219-230
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33835113 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145445 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751588 $s 1155321
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 72 $c 3 $d 219-230 $e 20210330 $i 2353-1339 $m Medycyna pracy $n Med Pr $x MED00003320
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113