• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic and oscillometric devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats

P. Cerna, PE. Archontakis, HO. Cheuk, DA. Gunn-Moore

. 2021 ; 23 (2) : 121-130. [pub] 20200625

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

OBJECTIVES: This study compared Doppler and oscillometric (PetMAP+) devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: Twenty-three cats were enrolled; however, five were excluded as fewer than five measurements were obtained for each assessment. All measurements were obtained according to American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus guidelines. Oscillometric device modes A and B were operated according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Doppler and oscillometric devices were used alternately as the first device. RESULTS: Systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) measurements were obtained by Doppler (SAPd) and oscillometry; the mean of each set of five values was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant difference between SAPd and SAP measurements in oscillometric modes A (P <0.001) and B (P <0.001). While both modes measured SAP higher than SAPd, B had a smaller bias (+15.72 mmHg) and narrower limits of agreement (LOA). There was also a significant difference between SAPd and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on oscillometric modes A (P = 0.002) and B (P <0.001). Both modes' MAP readings were lower than SAPd and oscillometric A MAP was closer to SAPd (-14.94 mmHg), with a smaller bias and narrower LOA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings support that Doppler and oscillometric devices cannot be used interchangeably, with or without proprietary optimisations. Methodology should always be taken into account and reference intervals (RIs) need to be defined for the different methodologies. Until methodology-specific RIs are published, definitive diagnosis of hypertension and sub-staging of patients with kidney disease according to the International Renal Interest Society guidelines remains challenging.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004650
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145105.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/1098612X20932407 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32580610
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Cerna, Petra $u Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK $u The University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic and oscillometric devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats / $c P. Cerna, PE. Archontakis, HO. Cheuk, DA. Gunn-Moore
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This study compared Doppler and oscillometric (PetMAP+) devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: Twenty-three cats were enrolled; however, five were excluded as fewer than five measurements were obtained for each assessment. All measurements were obtained according to American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus guidelines. Oscillometric device modes A and B were operated according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Doppler and oscillometric devices were used alternately as the first device. RESULTS: Systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) measurements were obtained by Doppler (SAPd) and oscillometry; the mean of each set of five values was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant difference between SAPd and SAP measurements in oscillometric modes A (P <0.001) and B (P <0.001). While both modes measured SAP higher than SAPd, B had a smaller bias (+15.72 mmHg) and narrower limits of agreement (LOA). There was also a significant difference between SAPd and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on oscillometric modes A (P = 0.002) and B (P <0.001). Both modes' MAP readings were lower than SAPd and oscillometric A MAP was closer to SAPd (-14.94 mmHg), with a smaller bias and narrower LOA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings support that Doppler and oscillometric devices cannot be used interchangeably, with or without proprietary optimisations. Methodology should always be taken into account and reference intervals (RIs) need to be defined for the different methodologies. Until methodology-specific RIs are published, definitive diagnosis of hypertension and sub-staging of patients with kidney disease according to the International Renal Interest Society guidelines remains challenging.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a krevní tlak $7 D001794
650    12
$a měření krevního tlaku $x veterinární $7 D001795
650    _2
$a monitory krevního tlaku $7 D015924
650    _2
$a kočky $7 D002415
650    _2
$a oscilometrie $x veterinární $7 D009991
650    12
$a ultrazvuk $7 D014465
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie dopplerovská $x veterinární $7 D018608
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Archontakis, Panos E $u Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Cheuk, Hester Ok $u First Vets, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
700    1_
$a Gunn-Moore, Danièlle A $u Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
773    0_
$w MED00166957 $t Journal of feline medicine and surgery $x 1532-2750 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2021), s. 121-130
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32580610 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145102 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751956 $s 1155799
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 23 $c 2 $d 121-130 $e 20200625 $i 1532-2750 $m Journal of feline medicine and surgery $n J Feline Med Surg $x MED00166957
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...