-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic and oscillometric devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats
P. Cerna, PE. Archontakis, HO. Cheuk, DA. Gunn-Moore
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
32580610
DOI
10.1177/1098612x20932407
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- kočky MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku * veterinární MeSH
- monitory krevního tlaku MeSH
- oscilometrie veterinární MeSH
- ultrasonografie dopplerovská veterinární MeSH
- ultrazvuk * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- kočky MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: This study compared Doppler and oscillometric (PetMAP+) devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: Twenty-three cats were enrolled; however, five were excluded as fewer than five measurements were obtained for each assessment. All measurements were obtained according to American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus guidelines. Oscillometric device modes A and B were operated according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Doppler and oscillometric devices were used alternately as the first device. RESULTS: Systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) measurements were obtained by Doppler (SAPd) and oscillometry; the mean of each set of five values was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant difference between SAPd and SAP measurements in oscillometric modes A (P <0.001) and B (P <0.001). While both modes measured SAP higher than SAPd, B had a smaller bias (+15.72 mmHg) and narrower limits of agreement (LOA). There was also a significant difference between SAPd and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on oscillometric modes A (P = 0.002) and B (P <0.001). Both modes' MAP readings were lower than SAPd and oscillometric A MAP was closer to SAPd (-14.94 mmHg), with a smaller bias and narrower LOA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings support that Doppler and oscillometric devices cannot be used interchangeably, with or without proprietary optimisations. Methodology should always be taken into account and reference intervals (RIs) need to be defined for the different methodologies. Until methodology-specific RIs are published, definitive diagnosis of hypertension and sub-staging of patients with kidney disease according to the International Renal Interest Society guidelines remains challenging.
1st Vets Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Department of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College University of London London UK
The Roslin Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
The University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004650
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145105.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1098612X20932407 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32580610
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Cerna, Petra $u Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK $u The University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic and oscillometric devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats / $c P. Cerna, PE. Archontakis, HO. Cheuk, DA. Gunn-Moore
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: This study compared Doppler and oscillometric (PetMAP+) devices (with or without proprietary optimisations) for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: Twenty-three cats were enrolled; however, five were excluded as fewer than five measurements were obtained for each assessment. All measurements were obtained according to American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus guidelines. Oscillometric device modes A and B were operated according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Doppler and oscillometric devices were used alternately as the first device. RESULTS: Systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) measurements were obtained by Doppler (SAPd) and oscillometry; the mean of each set of five values was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant difference between SAPd and SAP measurements in oscillometric modes A (P <0.001) and B (P <0.001). While both modes measured SAP higher than SAPd, B had a smaller bias (+15.72 mmHg) and narrower limits of agreement (LOA). There was also a significant difference between SAPd and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on oscillometric modes A (P = 0.002) and B (P <0.001). Both modes' MAP readings were lower than SAPd and oscillometric A MAP was closer to SAPd (-14.94 mmHg), with a smaller bias and narrower LOA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings support that Doppler and oscillometric devices cannot be used interchangeably, with or without proprietary optimisations. Methodology should always be taken into account and reference intervals (RIs) need to be defined for the different methodologies. Until methodology-specific RIs are published, definitive diagnosis of hypertension and sub-staging of patients with kidney disease according to the International Renal Interest Society guidelines remains challenging.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a krevní tlak $7 D001794
- 650 12
- $a měření krevního tlaku $x veterinární $7 D001795
- 650 _2
- $a monitory krevního tlaku $7 D015924
- 650 _2
- $a kočky $7 D002415
- 650 _2
- $a oscilometrie $x veterinární $7 D009991
- 650 12
- $a ultrazvuk $7 D014465
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie dopplerovská $x veterinární $7 D018608
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Archontakis, Panos E $u Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Cheuk, Hester Ok $u First Vets, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Gunn-Moore, Danièlle A $u Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK $u The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166957 $t Journal of feline medicine and surgery $x 1532-2750 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2021), s. 121-130
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32580610 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145102 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751956 $s 1155799
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 23 $c 2 $d 121-130 $e 20200625 $i 1532-2750 $m Journal of feline medicine and surgery $n J Feline Med Surg $x MED00166957
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113
