Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Trends and patterns in EU(7)-PIM prescribing to elderly patients in Germany

I. Selke Krulichová, GW. Selke, PA. Thürmann

. 2021 ; 77 (10) : 1553-1561. [pub] 20210503

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Observational Study

Grant support
PROGRES Q40-09 Univerzita Karlova v Praze

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore patterns and long-term development in prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to the EU(7)-PIM list to elderly patients in Germany. METHODS: We analysed anonymized German claims data. The study population comprised 6.0 million insured individuals at least 65 years old, including all their prescriptions reimbursed in 2019. For the analysis of long-term development, we used data for the years 2009-2019. Factors associated with PIM prescribing were considered from two perspectives: patient-oriented analysis was performed with logistic regression and prescriber-oriented analysis was performed with multiple linear regression. RESULTS: EU(7)-PIM prevalence was reduced from 56.9% in 2009 to 45.1% in 2019. Average annual volume (DDDs/insured) decreased from 145 in 2009 to 121 in 2019. These figures are substantially greater than those for the older PRISCUS list. The majority of investigated ATC level 2 groups with the highest EU(7)-PIM DDD volume exhibited substantial decreases; moderate increases were found for antihypertensive and urological drugs. Antithrombotics increased strongly with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The most prevalent EU(7)-PIM medication was diclofenac; however, in the age group 85+ years, apixaban was twice as prevalent as diclofenac. Polypharmacy, female sex, age < 90 years, need for nursing care and living in Eastern regions were identified as risk factors. Prescriber specialty was the most marked factor in the prescriber-oriented analysis. CONCLUSION: Although the use of EU(7)-PIMs has been declining, regional differences indicate considerable room for improvement. The comparison with PRISCUS highlights the necessity of regular updates of PIM lists.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22012132
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506125853.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00228-021-03148-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33938975
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Selke Krulichová, Iva $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. krulich@lfhk.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268150780 $7 xx0076216
245    10
$a Trends and patterns in EU(7)-PIM prescribing to elderly patients in Germany / $c I. Selke Krulichová, GW. Selke, PA. Thürmann
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore patterns and long-term development in prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to the EU(7)-PIM list to elderly patients in Germany. METHODS: We analysed anonymized German claims data. The study population comprised 6.0 million insured individuals at least 65 years old, including all their prescriptions reimbursed in 2 $a PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore patterns and long term development in prescribing potentially inappropriate medication PIM according to the EU 7 PIM list to elderly patients in Germany METHODS We analysed anonymized German claims data The study population comprised 6 0 million insured individuals at least 65 years old including all their prescriptions reimbursed in 2019 For $a PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore patterns and long-term development in prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to the EU(7)-PIM list to elderly patients in Germany. METHODS: We analysed anonymized German claims data. The study population comprised 6.0 million insured individuals at least 65 years old, including all their prescriptions reimbursed in 2019. For the analysis of long-term development, we used data for the years 2009-2019. Factors associated with PIM prescribing were considered from two perspectives: patient-oriented analysis was performed with logistic regression and prescriber-oriented analysis was performed with multiple linear regression. RESULTS: EU(7)-PIM prevalence was reduced from 56.9% in 2009 to 45.1% in 2019. Average annual volume (DDDs/insured) decreased from 145 in 2009 to 121 in 2019. These figures are substantially greater than those for the older PRISCUS list. The majority of investigated ATC level 2 groups with the highest EU(7)-PIM DDD volume exhibited substantial decreases; moderate increases were found for antihypertensive and urological drugs. Antithrombotics increased strongly with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The most prevalent EU(7)-PIM medication was diclofenac; however, in the age group 85+ years, apixaban was twice as prevalent as diclofenac. Polypharmacy, female sex, age < 90 years, need for nursing care and living in Eastern regions were identified as risk factors. Prescriber specialty was the most marked factor in the prescriber-oriented analysis. CONCLUSION: Although the use of EU(7)-PIMs has been declining, regional differences indicate considerable room for improvement. The comparison with PRISCUS highlights the necessity of regular updates of PIM lists.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a pojistná škoda - přezkoumání $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D007345
650    _2
$a polypharmacy $7 D019338
650    _2
$a seznam potenciálně nevhodných léčiv $x statistika a číselné údaje $x trendy $7 D000067561
650    _2
$a charakteristiky bydlení $7 D012111
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
651    _2
$a Německo $x epidemiologie $7 D005858
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Selke, Gisbert W $u AOK Research Institute (Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK), Berlin, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000296149875
700    1_
$a Thürmann, Petra A $u Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany $u Philipp-Klee-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, HELIOS University Clinic Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00001613 $t European journal of clinical pharmacology $x 1432-1041 $g Roč. 77, č. 10 (2021), s. 1553-1561
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938975 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506125845 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789636 $s 1163333
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 77 $c 10 $d 1553-1561 $e 20210503 $i 1432-1041 $m European journal of clinical pharmacology $n Eur J Clin Pharmacol $x MED00001613
GRA    __
$a PROGRES Q40-09 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...