Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

B. Pradere, D. D'Andrea, VM. Schuettfort, B. Foerster, F. Quhal, K. Mori, M. Abufaraj, V. Margulis, M. Deuker, A. Briganti, T. Muilwijk, K. Hendricksen, Y. Lotan, P. Karakiewic, S. F Shariat, UTUC collaboration

. 2021 ; 39 (7) : 2567-2577. [pub] 20201016

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22012385

E-zdroje NLK Online Plný text

ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: The accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC. METHODS: We retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut-off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut-off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS. RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11-56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98-1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Pre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22012385
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130215.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-020-03479-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33067726
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277688558
245    10
$a Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma / $c B. Pradere, D. D'Andrea, VM. Schuettfort, B. Foerster, F. Quhal, K. Mori, M. Abufaraj, V. Margulis, M. Deuker, A. Briganti, T. Muilwijk, K. Hendricksen, Y. Lotan, P. Karakiewic, S. F Shariat, UTUC collaboration
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC. METHODS: We retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut-off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut-off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS. RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11-56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98-1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Pre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x krev $x terapie $7 D002295
650    _2
$a globuliny $x analýza $7 D005916
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nádory ledvin $x krev $x terapie $7 D007680
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neoadjuvantní terapie $7 D020360
650    _2
$a mnohočetné primární nádory $x krev $x terapie $7 D009378
650    12
$a nefroureterektomie $7 D000074682
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a sérový albumin $x analýza $7 D012709
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a nádory močovodu $x krev $x terapie $7 D014516
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Schuettfort, Victor M $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Foerster, Beat $u Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Ad Dammām, Saudi Arabia
700    1_
$a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
700    1_
$a Abufaraj, Mohammad $u Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Margulis, Vitaly $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Deuker, Marine $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Muilwijk, Tim $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Hendricksen, Kees $u Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Lotan, Yair $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Karakiewic, Pierre $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a F Shariat, Shahrokh $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
710    2_
$a UTUC collaboration
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 39, č. 7 (2021), s. 2567-2577
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33067726 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130208 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789820 $s 1163586
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 39 $c 7 $d 2567-2577 $e 20201016 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...